Los Angeles, Calif.
|Posted - Oct 29 2000 : 7:43PM|
Reading the PORN vs. REAL LIFE thread got me wondering about this again - why are there no videos which show a guy ejaculating inside a woman's vagina (at least partially)? I for one find have found the whole facial thing rather weird - that's one thing I have NEVER wanted to do in real life. Just what the heck is so fun for the guy or girl about it? It's almost to the point where I have to stop the video when that moment comes or I lose myself laughing! A LONG time ago (maybe 15 years?) I saw some hardcore magazine shots which showed some rather impressive images of a penis partially inserted in a woman with her on top, and the cum dripping out the bottom - I'm sure this kind of thing is just so much easier to fake with still photographs, but those images are so much more "real life" erotic to me that I find it hard to believe that nobody else would like to see that too. Are video companies really catering to what most guys want and I'm the teensy minority, or is there some other strange reason this is so hard to capture on video?
|Posted - Oct 29 2000 : 7:59PM|
i know what you are saying?i also get sick of all the unloading on the face action,i have found acouple of good internal cumm shots,up and cummers 11,has a nice internal cumm shot with jenna jameson,you really get to see the load spill out,all over the bed,also action sports sex,has an ok internal cumm shot in the ass with shelbee mine,their needs to be much more of this type of action?sirnocternal
|Posted - Oct 29 2000 : 8:51PM|
SmoothNSlow : The definitive guide to what you describe is at Cream Pie...
Evil Angel DVD
Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous?
|Posted - Oct 30 2000 : 6:21PM|
I don't mean to ruin your fantasy, but maybe one reason is the risk of pregnancy that girls don't want to add on to the other risks they're taking during work.
I only did one internal scene (my gangbang), and I remember that even though I was on birth control, the next month or two, I was praying that my pills wouldn't fail.
Also, it really increases the risk of STD transmission -- much more so than facials. Internal anal cumshots are the worst risk taker for this. I still have problems watching a guy come on a girl's asshole, let alone inside it.
Finally, the biggest fantasy breaker of all (sorry), for most of the porn girls, this is work, and a guy coming inside them might be too emotional. If the guy pulls out, it keeps the sex one step away from being too personal.
But if this is your thing, Randy West has a vid called Please CUM inside me. A lot of his Up and Cummers have internals too.
|Posted - Oct 30 2000 : 7:38PM|
And that's why nearly all internal cum shots are done in either amateur or pro-am videos...
Los Angeles, Calif.
|Posted - Oct 30 2000 : 10:13PM|
Tricia - good points, I did think about the STD risk actually, but I sort of figured it was somewhere close on the risk scale to "condom/no-condom".
Thanks also Saki for pointing out the CreamPie link. Interesting - it's almost too extreme!
I guess perhaps my fascination is not so much with the internal cum shot. I'm more puzzled why the facial has is just so dang common. It's not like it's something that I ever thought of before I saw my first porno, and even now it's just weird. I'd just as well see everyone finish with a hand-stand.
Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service.
|Posted - Oct 31 2000 : 8:21AM|
|Posted - Oct 31 2000 : 8:59AM|
Thanks SmoothNSlow, for bringing up this subject, and it's good to hear from guys who are as mystified by the alleged attractiveness of this practice as I am. I've asked many friends of mine, male & female, about their thoughts on this, and I have yet to hear anyone say it's a turn-on, hearing comments ranging from "laughable" to "degrading". I mean. it's gotten to the point that instead of fast-forwarding sometimes to get to the good part, we'll now fast-forward as soon as he inevitably aims it at her face, her sitting there with her tongue hanging out. What a turn-off! I understand the reasons for the vaginal cumshot not being an option - but what about just having the guy fake it once in a while? I realize I'm probably in the minority here, but do we always have to see to believe?
I am curious about how these things get started. Obviously videos with facials sell, but I think porn will sell regardless. Personally, I've turned to older titles, as have many other people I know. And to the studios - are you sure this is what the people want, or is it just a fad, or what?
|Posted - Oct 31 2000 : 3:34PM|
First, I'm part of the majority that really likes facials. I don't know why... I just do. I also like internals too... as long as they show it ooze out. If it's insinuated, then I feel cheated. The new safe sex method of cumming on the tits does nothing for me. I guess because porn is a fantasy and to me, condoms and "safe" cumshots ruin it.
I know that diseases and AIDS are the reason for these precautions, but I can't help what turns me on in porn.
|Posted - Oct 31 2000 : 3:45PM|
Oh yeah... I forgot to mention... It's too bad that Randy West is one doing internals. He has one of the weakest pop shots in the industry.... besides being difficult on the eyes. I can't stomach watching any movie he's in.. it's like watching my grandpa fuck a college girl.
|Posted - Feb 7 2001 : 3:40PM|
Barely Legal #3 has an excellent internal cumshot with Ariel if you are interested.
|Posted - Feb 8 2001 : 10:38AM|
Amen brother amen! Doesn't do anything for me. I loved cuming inside the ass and on top of the back, buttcheeks, breasts...or ankle. (WTF?)
|Posted - Feb 9 2001 : 6:25PM|
|Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post.|
|URL of this thread|
|Link to this specific post with HTML|
|Link to this spcific post with Forum Code|