3-D Technology meets porn.. How close are we?

Author	Post
wmonbear Deactivated User 380 Posts 6/09	Posted - Mar 12 2010 : 6:01AM The latest electronic buzz seems to be the potentially revolutionary realm of 3-D entertainment. Can you possibly imagine watching a sex scene (while donning 3-D glasses) featuring your favorite pornstar on your huge 1080p, 3-D format HDTV monitor? How cool would that be? If you think you're a porn junkie now, just wait until this thing hits? I think it would be safe to say that the porn industry slump would effectively end, once this technology takes hold. Anyone know of any adult DVD production companies looking to capitalize on this? I understand that producing 3-D material is very expensive and therefore might be cost prohibitive for many studios. Anyone have any information to share on the subject? (General comments also welcome) [Link]
RandomPrecision Senior Member Enjoy! 8175 Posts 3/06	Posted - Mar 12 2010 : 6:51AM Anything that requires me to get another loan to pay for it ain't happenin' in my house. 2D pics of naked women will have to do until better tech is dirt cheap. [Link]
UnkwnUsr2 Member 443 Posts 2/05	Posted - Mar 12 2010 : 11:40AM wmonbear wrote: Can you possibly imagine watching a sex scene (while donning 3-D glasses) featuring your favorite pornstar on your huge 1080p, 3-D format HDTV monitor? How cool would that be? If you think you're a porn junkie now, just wait until this thing hits? Click to expand There's already plenty of 3D porn out there. The problem is that acceptably good 3D technology for home use is exceedingly expensive. Video gamers currently profit most from 3D technology because you can play almost every video game in 3D, whereas only a tiny fraction of movies and porn are released in 3D. 3D on the PC is more affordable than on a TV. I think it would be safe to say that the porn industry slump would effectively end, once this technology takes hold. Click to expand Not at all, since it can be pirated just as easily. The reason cinema is shifting towards 3D is because it gives new incentive to go out and see it on the big screen. Of course this doesn't apply to porn. Anyone know of any adult DVD production companies looking to capitalize on this? Click to expand Tommy Gunn made one. Also a set of 3D HD lesbian scenes from Europe. There are a couple of emerging websites offering original 3D porn footage (mostly softcore for now though, google). I understand that producing 3-D material is very expensive and therefore might be cost prohibitive for many studios. Click to expand It's not expensive at all, you just need 2 cameras or a stereo camera that costs roughly twice as much as a normal one. It is very affordable, for a studio anyway. [Link]
all waizorny Member 100 Posts 5/09	Posted - Mar 12 2010 : 11:57AM This will be huge when it comes to POV porn. And even more if it is combined with interactive possibilities. But still nothing beats the real thing. [Link]
Moony Member 143 Posts 8/08	Posted - Mar 12 2010 : 12:45PM This is what you can expect - need to cross eyes to see the effect. http://www.3d-eros.com/samples/g-ryoko-asuka/ryoko-asuka-019.jpg Loads more here http://www.3d-eros.com/gallery-e.html [Link]

RFrog Member 396 Posts 10/07	Posted - Apr 11 2010 : 11:50AM I think 3D will breathe new life into porn. Especially POV porn. I'm looking forward to it. Interactive features, though? For example: speak aloud, "Show me your ass" or "Let's do doggy style" etc and the woman does it... well... that will probably be possible but that's years or decades away. [Link]
Dread Senior Member Latex and boobs 5085 Posts 3/07	Posted - Apr 11 2010 : 12:19PM I don't know about anyone else, but not looking forward to 3D Porn. The only viable time i could see would be POV scenes, but even then it doesn't interest me at all. ----Dread---- [Link]
Len801 Deactivated User 754 Posts 9/07	Posted - Apr 11 2010 : 12:33PM 3-D has been done before (in 1970's in 1990's) and it never took off like its mainstream sibling. Unless you can view 3-D (and it has been developped) without having to don special glasses and not have headaches over it (let alone the price you will have to pay, at at the initial stages), it wil always be a gimmick. It is tought to fool the eye with 3-D effects. [Link]
pat362 Senior Member 10083 Posts 3/10	Posted - Apr 11 2010 : 1:15PM I've seen a couple of recent movies that used 3D techology and I find that the best shots were those that involved outdoor scenery. That's not ususally what you get in porn movies and I can't imagine that it's cheap to produce. Therefore it makes the investment nearly useless to porn studios. Which studio is going to spend extra money to produce material that most people don't care about and those that do can't afford the equipment to see it. Not too mention but I read last week that 3D televisions still have some major bugs in them. [Link]
Len801 Deactivated User 754 Posts 9/07	Posted - Apr 11 2010 : 1:32PM pat362 wrote: I've seen a couple of recent movies that used 3D techology and I find that the best shots were those that involved outdoor scenery. That's not ususally what you get in porn movies and I can't imagine that it's cheap to produce. Therefore it makes the investment nearly useless to porn studios. Which studio is going to spend extra money to produce material that most people don't care about and those that do can't afford the equipment to see it. Not too mention but I read last week that 3D televisions still have some major bugs in them. Click to expand It took quite a while before the porn industry was able to release its movies on Blu-ray, as Sony was reluctant to hand over the technology to the porn industry. It (blu ray) still has not taken off in a big way (most video stores in my area hardly carry blu-ray porn titles) and already we are talking about 3-D. Most porn scenes (especially the gonzo and plot-driven features) are shot indoors and for 3-D effects you need very brightly lit sets/surroundings. The result will always look dark (outer ridges of the frame will look fuzzy, and you myst keep body and camera movements somewhat muted), whereas audience prefers to see all the action and all the naughty parts clearly and well lit. And I am sure the technology will not be cheap to either shoot it or to manufacture/distribute it. [Link]
Prophit Member 378 Posts 1/07	Posted - Apr 11 2010 : 4:32PM Len801 wrote: It took quite a while before the porn industry was able to release its movies on Blu-ray, as Sony was reluctant to hand over the technology to the porn industry. It (blu ray) still has not taken off in a big way (most video stores in my area hardly carry blu-ray porn titles) and already we are talking about 3-D. Click to expand 3D will fail because Sony is backing it in a major way. That's always the first sign of failure. [Link]
the unknown pervert Deactivated User I'd like to stay but I've got a plane to catch. 3243 Posts 5/06	Posted - Apr 13 2010 : 11:45AM DreadSynapse wrote: I don't know about anyone else, but not looking forward to 3D Porn. The only viable time i could see would be POV scenes, but even then it doesn't interest me at all. ----Dread---- Click to expand Ditto, simply because it will bring new meaning to the phrase cumdodger. [Link]
Bluto Deactivated User 511 Posts 3/09	Posted - Apr 29 2010 : 8:01AM I'd prefer sniff porn. [Link]
richieg New Member 4 Posts 4/08	Posted - Apr 29 2010 : 8:55AM 3dp.cz? [Link]
Jaktarn Senior Member 4798 Posts 5/05	Posted - Apr 29 2010 : 9:09AM It will be getting really interesting when someone come up with an interactive fleshlight. I mean with Wii that would be a possibility without adoubt. The fleshlight can feel your arousal and when you ejacualate so for 3D POV porn it would be insanely hot not to forget voice activation aswell. [Link]

UnkwnUsr2 Member 443 Posts 2/05	Posted - Apr 29 2010 : 1:45PM Jaktarn wrote: It will be getting really interesting when someone come up with an interactive fleshlight. I mean with Wii that would be a possibility without adoubt. The fleshlight can feel your arousal and when you ejacualate so for 3D POV porn it would be insanely hot not to forget voice activation aswell. Click to expand There already is something similar to that called the RealTouch which mimics the action of screen, but it isn't really interactive. There have also been attempts at interactivity but those have been flawed to say the least. If by 3D you mean virtual so no real people, then I think that's too niche to sell good enough since most people would prefer films of real people. But with real recordings of people you can't really have the interactive aspect. [Link]
JohnW Senior Member 1351 Posts 6/08	Posted - Apr 29 2010 : 5:28PM The current technology used in theaters (and soon in tvs) suffer from several serious problems IMO. 1) Light output is halved when using glasses. The picture appears much more washed out. Until you have extreme amounts of brightness and contrast this will be an issue and just make it look less appealing. 2) Glasses. Simply a pain, and not something you'd wear at all times. So that means you'd have to enable/disable 3d mode depending on whats going on around you (and other people watching would be similarly annoyed by switching modes). 3) Frames per second. Film has been stuck at 24 fps since the 1920s. It is embarrassing that we haven't moved on, and the choppiness is even worse in 3d mode. It was a major distraction for the first 15 minutes of Avatar for me. Unless Hollywood get their heads out of their asses and improve theaters, and directors starting using higher frame rates, 3d will look much less natural and smooth than it should. Edited by - johnw on 4/29/2010 5:29:30 PM [Link]
AsianAnalPantyhoserGuy Deactivated User Ass fucking/ foot fetish/ pantyhose= insanity! 465 Posts 3/10	Posted - Apr 29 2010 : 5:56PM I found a box of 3-D glasses behind a building one day. I put them on and everything looked different to me. When I looked at a billboard advertisement with the glasses off, it said "Come to the Bahamas", but when I put on the glasses, it said "marry and reproduce" in generic style letters. Some fucking lizard looking man reading a magazine looked at me and said "what's your problem?"....that was enough for me. I took off the glasses, but had a massive headache for the next hour. Fuck 3-D! [Link]
Jaktarn Senior Member 4798 Posts 5/05	Posted - Apr 29 2010 : 6:22PM UnkwnUsr2 wrote: Jaktarn wrote: It will be getting really interesting when someone come up with an interactive fleshlight. I mean with Wii that would be a possibility without adoubt. The fleshlight can feel your arousal and when you ejacualate so for 3D POV porn it would be insanely hot not to forget voice activation aswell. Click to expand There already is something similar to that called the RealTouch which mimics the action of screen, but it isn't really interactive. There have also been attempts at interactivity but those have been flawed to say the least. If by 3D you mean virtual so no real people, then I think that's too niche to sell good enough since most people would prefer films of real people. But with real recordings of people you can't really have the interactive aspect. Click to expand I meant filmed sequences but built up like the interactive titles today but with 3D, voiceactivation and a fleshlight with an USB interface... Its probably the clocest to virtual reality sex style we are gonna have for the next couple of years. [Link]
stiffy968323 Member 15 Posts 3/08	Posted - Apr 29 2010 : 7:53PM Len801 wrote: 3-D has been done before (in 1970's in 1990's) and it never took off like its mainstream sibling. Unless you can view 3-D (and it has been developped) without having to don special glasses and not have headaches over it (let alone the price you will have to pay, at at the initial stages), it wil always be a gimmick. It is tought to fool the eye with 3-D effects. Click to expand Amen!! This sums it up perfectly!! [Link]
UnkwnUsr2 Member 443 Posts 2/05	Posted - Apr 29 2010 : 8:20PM stiffy968323 wrote: Len801 wrote: 3-D has been done before (in 1970's in 1990's) and it never took off like its mainstream sibling. Unless you can view 3-D (and it has been developped) without having to don special glasses and not have headaches over it (let alone the price you will have to pay, at at the initial stages), it wil always be a gimmick. It is tought to fool the eye with 3-D effects. Click to expand Amen!! This sums it up perfectly!! Click to expand Meanwhile in reality [Link]
shalalin Senior Member 1734 Posts 11/07	Posted - Apr 30 2010 : 9:56AM UnkwnUsr2 wrote: Meanwhile in reality Click to expand Please. Like the denizens of Hollywood have never gone ga-ga over ultimately shortlived fads before. [Link]
RandomPrecision Senior Member Enjoy! 8175 Posts 3/06	Posted - Apr 30 2010 : 10:11AM UnkwnUsr2 wrote: Meanwhile in reality Click to expand Funny. However, I watched the regular DVD version of Avatar on my 27" Sony Wega. I'm not spending the money even on a HD setup. To say nothing of 3D. I'm finished paying fortunes for the newest tech. It's just not worth it. [Link]