48 hours abstinence before a scene, please

Author	Post
juha Senior Member 2752 Posts 3/05	Posted - Jul 28 2009 : 12:03PM I have a request for the guys in porn. Please, don't have sex for two days before a scene. That would improve the loads significantly. I know most guys shoot on a daily basis, even several scenes a day. But this results in weaker money shots. [Link]
smeghead Member 670 Posts 12/07	Posted - Jul 28 2009 : 12:44PM "Please, don't have sex for two days before a scene." "I know most guys shoot on a daily basis, even several scenes a day." So how exactly do you expect performers to do this? Jump in a time machine? I agree that bigger loads would be better for all scenes, but when most of them do several scenes a day most days of the week, how on earth do you expect them to save it up? [Link]
juha Senior Member 2752 Posts 3/05	Posted - Jul 28 2009 : 1:44PM ^ They should shoot only two or three scenes per week. [Link]
Joey Starr Senior Member Still wanking after all these years. 8082 Posts 10/00	Posted - Jul 28 2009 : 1:59PM Not sure where you get your facts, but from my own experience I can shoot huge loads when the excitation and build up is intense, especially with anal stimulation. That's regardless of how many wanks (or orgasms during intercourse) I had the day before. Maybe the girls should fuck the guys with strapons or at least stuff big butt plugs up their asses? Edited by - Joey Starr on 7/28/2009 2:00:53 PM [Link]
Zoid Senior Member Boobies and Anal 2004 Posts 5/04	Posted - Jul 28 2009 : 2:43PM Porn guys aren't paid relative to the amount of sperm they ejaculate, so asking them not to shoot is like asking them to throw away money. [Link]

xayhoundb Senior Member 2721 Posts 11/08	Posted - Jul 28 2009 : 3:17PM Some guys don't even work like that anyways. You gotta understand too.. they see so many hot girls daily, how many actually get that "excited" to shoot huge loads anyway. Probably why most have to do the work themselves just to get a little drip out. [Link]
Cuddly Wombat Senior Member Just another bare bum in the shiower 1739 Posts 12/04	Posted - Jul 29 2009 : 7:50AM They need to go back to eating a big bowl of chicken noodle soup and swallowing down a dozen egg whites before every scene. [Link]
john5527 Member 62 Posts 1/09	Posted - Jul 29 2009 : 2:29PM Zoid wrote: Porn guys aren't paid relative to the amount of sperm they ejaculate, so asking them not to shoot is like asking them to throw away money. Click to expand Lol. Very true when you think about it that way. I guess I forget they are not there for us pornfans. They are there to get paid. I can't say that I blame them for shooting everyday if they can. Sucks to be us fans though. [Link]
Jimmy Hooligan Member 452 Posts 7/09	Posted - Jul 29 2009 : 4:08PM I shoot bigger loads if I hold off for 3 days.... The orgasm is way more intense, too. Shit... right now I'm probably at a 4 time a day habit playing with my noodle. I need help! Whenever I do have a shoot, I hold off for a few days so the spunk can build up. It works for me. - Jimmy Hooligan http://www.jimmyhooligan.com [Link]
smutlover65 Member 359 Posts 10/07	Posted - Jul 29 2009 : 7:43PM The one type of movie where a 48 hour abstinence period should be mandatory is a blow bang or swallowing flick. The whole point of these movies is to see a girl swallow as much sperm as she can, and when you see guys dropping low volume loads it just defeats the whole purpose. [Link]
SxDoctor Member 103 Posts 10/06	Posted - Jul 29 2009 : 7:53PM Telling people they need to work less seems excessive. On the other hand, I think it is reasonable to suggest that cutting out off-camera sex would be the more professional thing to do if it enhances the load one can deliver. [Link]
Dubious_Leftovers Senior Member And on that fateful day, the hatred consumed me... 1423 Posts 3/09	Posted - Jul 29 2009 : 8:34PM The more scenes guys do, the more money they're paid - it's their job. They have a right to earn money, the same as you do. Besides, a period of abstinence may cause other shit to happen such as premature ejaculation, then there's no scene, and that's not a good thing. [Link]
john5527 Member 62 Posts 1/09	Posted - Jul 29 2009 : 9:57PM Dubious_Leftovers wrote: The more scenes guys do, the more money they're paid - it's their job. They have a right to earn money, the same as you do. Besides, a period of abstinence may cause other shit to happen such as premature ejaculation, then there's no scene, and that's not a good thing. Click to expand I would mind the dude cumming before he plans it, but i guess that wouldn't work in porn since they have to time it. Just let it happen like a shane's world movie. But I guess most movies aren't like college invasion. [Link]
BigBobxxx Senior Member 2681 Posts 5/04	Posted - Jul 29 2009 : 11:17PM I've seen as many scenes ruined from a weak cumshot as from any other reason. How about, if your cumshots need a little "help," try cutting back a bit? Peter North -- who arguably shot the most massive cumshots day-in/day-out for 20-years -- also probably shot more scenes than anyone else. All studs have different levels of loads related to frequency. Clearly, Peter could do both. Studios, for some reason, seem oblivious to fan's likes and dislikes regarding studs. Here are a few ideas to enhance male performances: Shut the fuck up. Get it hard. Shoot a decent load. Girls do a lot of work to deliver quality scenes. If they don't deliver, they don't get much work. Think of all the prep it takes for girls to do anal scenes? I don't think it's too much to ask professional porn studs to make an effort to do what it takes to deliver top performances: Get enough sleep. Stop smoking. Drink plenty of water. Evaluate your own frequency/quality of your performances, and work a plan for maximizing your results. Find out what foods/drinks (if any) and safe supplements will help you to shoot bigger loads. The stud matters so much more than most viewers will admit. Although the girls typically get all the credit -- and blame -- for the quality of scenes, a bad performance by the stud ruins the scene, no matter how good the girl is... and that's the truth. [Link]
juha Senior Member 2752 Posts 3/05	Posted - Jul 30 2009 : 4:58AM Zoid wrote: Porn guys aren't paid relative to the amount of sperm they ejaculate, so asking them not to shoot is like asking them to throw away money. Click to expand The cumshot is the MONEY shot. That's what the customer pays for. Every professional athlete cuts back on sports meeting visits (and "throws away money") to be in peak form for the Olympics. Can't we expect the same from porn actors before they shoot a big budget title? Edited by - juha on 7/30/2009 4:59:43 AM [Link]

Zoid Senior Member Boobies and Anal 2004 Posts 5/04	Posted - Jul 30 2009 : 9:31AM juha wrote: The cumshot is the MONEY shot. That's what the customer pays for. Click to expand But customer doesn't pay more if it's a big money shot. Can't we expect the same from porn actors before they shoot a big budget title? Click to expand Sure, as long as they get gold medals for shooting big loads. Edited by - Zoid on 7/30/2009 9:31:40 AM [Link]
juha Senior Member 2752 Posts 3/05	Posted - Jul 30 2009 : 11:12AM Zoid wrote: Sure, as long as they get gold medals for shooting big loads. Click to expand Good idea. A special award for exceptional money shot accomplishments. A gold medal with an image of Peter North on it. [Link]
xayhoundb Senior Member 2721 Posts 11/08	Posted - Jul 30 2009 : 1:50PM BigBobxxx wrote: The stud matters so much more than most viewers will admit. Although the girls typically get all the credit -- and blame -- for the quality of scenes, a bad performance by the stud ruins the scene, no matter how good the girl is... and that's the truth. Click to expand I agree 100%. [Link]
JordanLanexxx Member 12 Posts 1/09	Posted - Jul 30 2009 : 2:53PM Most of my pops are consistent in there inconsistency, e.g.: Scene one for Devil's Film with Sheila Marie. The pop from position was nominal so I sat back down and set up the pop (jerked to pop which I know everybody hates but usually done to save time both for the director and the girl). The aforementioned pop was sufficient in my opinion. Scene two: Called to set for a quick scene with Brook Banner, prodigious pop after popping 2x an hour earlier. Scene three: Called back to set for White Ghetto's "Black Cheerleaders", average pop. Four was a booty call with an unnamed female director and a monster pop that is still floating around in her pool somewhere LOL. It's profoundly difficult and a total crapshoot for any of us to accurately and consistently guage the amount... Plus most of us have active social calenders as well. Hope that gives some insight. [Link]
JohnHenry Member 165 Posts 3/09	Posted - Jul 30 2009 : 5:10PM Ditto. Sometimes my third load of the day is more copious than the first two put together. In my experience, it has more to do with how into the scene the girl is than anything else. The colder the girl is, the weaker the pop on my end. Just my two cents. John [Link]
viper2ko Member 40 Posts 6/09	Posted - Jul 30 2009 : 6:39PM The First load if you abstain for a few days is always gonna be thick, smelly, and volumous. Which is exactly what fans wanna see coverin a girls face or breasts. Not a few drips of watery jizz. [Link]
Jaktarn Senior Member 4798 Posts 5/05	Posted - Jul 30 2009 : 6:41PM Still when being cast to a blowbang/gangbang scene for instance I would like it if the directors actually stressed that its good if the male talent haven't shot a bunch of scenes the day before etc. I mean look at Brandons older work a lot of those headless guys shot monsterloads on those blowbangs and I hate to admit it being a little gay but its hot as hell! I rather see that than those thin dribbling drops that a lot of a-list guys produce due to heavy workload. [Link]
smutlover65 Member 359 Posts 10/07	Posted - Jul 30 2009 : 7:32PM For swallowing theme movies, why not pay the guys extra money for big loads? A performance bonus! [Link]
Jaktarn Senior Member 4798 Posts 5/05	Posted - Jul 30 2009 : 7:36PM Great suggestion! [Link]
10000 days Deactivated User Keep on trolling. What a bullshit! Im fucking unstoppable now ... 717 Posts 3/06	Posted - Jul 30 2009 : 7:47PM If they haven't fucked in a couple of days, they tend to have less stamina and are more sensitive. I think sometimes the poor shots are because they've already cummed multiple times off-camera. [Link]

Cuddly Wombat Senior Member Just another bare bum in the shiower 1739 Posts 12/04	Posted - Jul 31 2009 : 8:55AM I can't help thinking that there is some primal chemistry also going on here. If you are really into a girl (and subconsciously want to impregnate her) you are going to muster a greater load no matter how soon it was after you last popped. After all, your body is continually manufacturing sperm. Similarly, if the girl is fertile at the relevant time, your body may also subconsciously react to this 'opportunity' and shoot a bigger load. [Link]
Jaktarn Senior Member 4798 Posts 5/05	Posted - Jul 31 2009 : 9:23AM Cuddly: I dont know about that it seem a bit biological and chemical. [Link]
CUMSplash Member 6 Posts 7/09	Posted - Jul 31 2009 : 11:00AM Cuddly Wombat was right sometimes but not ever... I think that some porn actor make many masturbation for avoid to come very faster during the scene...this is the cause of poor load...very bad! [Link]
Jaktarn Senior Member 4798 Posts 5/05	Posted - Jul 31 2009 : 5:34PM Cumsplash: I sure as hell hope that thats not the fact. Then they shouldn't be in porn. Besides haven't viagra taken care of this problem already??? [Link]
Randomizer Member 234 Posts 6/08	Posted - Aug 1 2009 : 3:08AM I couldn't care less about 48 hours vs. 10 minutes, but to me, a paid professional who consistently fails to shoot large loads is NO DIFFERENT than a paid professional who can't keep his dick hard on camera -- it's all part of working in the business. I don't care enough to follow the details closely, but I get the impression that legends like Peter North go to great lengths to ensure that almost all their scenes have impressive cumshots -- it reminds me of a comment by Michael Jordan where he said something like, "people seem to think I just roll out of bed in the morning and do slam dunks without any practice." Yes, there's a huge amount of natural talent involved, but the guy also gave 100% effort. [Link]
Jaktarn Senior Member 4798 Posts 5/05	Posted - Aug 1 2009 : 7:43AM Peter North is interesting in this case. I mean the guy worked like hell and almost always came through with his explosive cumshots. A guy that apparently has the ability to cum really hard and much is Kyle Stone he has a great fountainlike cumshot in a groupsexscene hosted by a german blonde whoh did some US porn (this was an american film) he just lies there being jerked of by two girls and the semen probably reach the ceiling a couple of times and he just lies there screaming with joy and everyone starts laughing when seeing it. It was hillarious. My point is that he hardly have the same track record as Peter North and maybe its because of his workload. Kyle have great abilities but is a bit uneven. Edited by - jaktarn on 8/1/2009 7:44:29 AM [Link]
Ignatz Deactivated User 269 Posts 2/12	Posted - Apr 21 2012 : 10:35AM Ain't gonna change. [Link]