Working Girls 3 (Reality Junkies) - review by Captain Jack| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| simon33333 All-Star Member 828 Posts 9/09 | Hi folks Pardon me if I make a mistake on what I am trying to say here, iam tired, but busy and wanted to find out what others have experienced. I purchased Taboo Part one and the clearness of the dvd was excellent. They must have had a real good master to pull a dvd from it. Three faces of Angel: Ok, not as clear, but I left good feedback with seller in light of the fact that they sell and do not make the dvds. I want to be fair. Debbie does em all: ok, average quality. My gripe I guess is this: Can the companies transferring these oldies to dvd use better equipment to enhance the quality or is it just not cost effective. Taboo was near perfect. I did not buy it for the theme but because of Kay Parker. I like her work. I just ordered A movie with Taija Rae, lovely sexy woman I adore. I saw that is was digitalized, but I don't know how well. Reflecting on movies like "Dirt Harry" " Robocop" which came out about the same time, these copies are just clearer! One actress starred in a movie that is xxx rated that has the incest theme in it. I don't even look to much at the theme just the sex. Knowing it's all fake, are companies pushing the envelope a bit too much on that theme. It's a fine line I will say. Is this "incest" movie stuff getting bigger? On video box they had Sibling or something like that, I did not watch or dL. Another I did bit just out of curiosity sake and the actors say we are not related. I mean if I like an actress enough and she does this, I will buy it, but if it gets out of hand, as in the companies push out more on the same actress I will stop buying and move to another actress. Just want to find out what is going on. I did combine two subjects in on thread, sorry about that. Not feeling to great. thanks for all input ahead of time and I wish u all well. Edited by - simon33333 on Mar 10 2015 Edited by - simon33333 on Mar 10 2015 [Link] |
| jayo All-Star Member 2117 Posts 7/04 | Ideally people would buy from the former and shun the latter, but it doesn't happen that way. Hopefully the quality studios make enough money to keep going, and use pride in their product as part of their mission (along with profit). |
| simon33333 All-Star Member 828 Posts 9/09 | |
| Flash Golden Age Classic 11018 Posts 5/01 | Some rundowns from companies that hit my head at the moment: Vinegar Syndrome puts out amazing classic releases. Standard Digital usually does decent ones. Caballero is very hit or miss. VCX/Cal Vista/Collector's has more misses than hits same with Arrow. Alpha Blue Archives has the rare decent one, most are horrible. Video-X-Pix/Distribpix many of their old releases were horrible, their newer ones are around Vinegar Syndrome quality. After Hours Cinema is hit or miss, usually better than Alpha Blue Archives. Synapse/Impulse has some good and bad ones. TVX were awful. VCA was okay/decent. Gourmet is awful. Mitchell Brothers is decent/better. These are just one ones that come to mind immediately. If you have overall questions on other companies, I and I am sure others here, can give a general feel for their releases. |
| jayo All-Star Member 2117 Posts 7/04 | |
| Flash Golden Age Classic 11018 Posts 5/01 | |
| Jacco All-Star Member "liable to deprave and corrupt" 2673 Posts 5/04 | |
| Gore Gore Girl Doctor of the Erotic Arts 7238 Posts 1/09 | Regarding restored 80s films, Vinegar Syndrome as someone else noted, and also Wildside. Tabu is another company that I haven't had a chance to check out yet. I am hoping that Distribpix will start putting out their 80s content some time soon also. |
| Jacco All-Star Member "liable to deprave and corrupt" 2673 Posts 5/04 | |
| simon33333 All-Star Member 828 Posts 9/09 | |
| simon33333 All-Star Member 828 Posts 9/09 |
|
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |