Suddenly, most pictures (box covers, screen shots, etc) at Adult DVD Empire are not displayed anymore. Instead, a grey box appears (where, normally, a picture would appear) with the caption "Restricted Due To 2257 Regulation " printed inside it.
Can someone please explain what on Earth is going on? I wrote to their customer service but there's been no response yet.
What I find interesting is that AdultDVDEmpire is in full-on 2257 compliance mode right now, taking down a dizzying amount of boxcovers and screenshots(!). However, other retail sites such as adultcdmovies and jadedvideo are proceeding with business as normal. Hmmm.
Adultdvdmarketplace has removed most cover pictures already, as well, yet action-dvd.com still is business as usual. It's interesting to keep an eye on, that's for sure.
So I assume site operators, specializing in "Granny Porn" can go about things laissez faire, conveniently immune from the pestilence of this vast scourging.
Don't you just love ole George W. Bush? Our country has gone to shit thanks to this man. This is probably just the start of things to come. I honestly don't think there is much to worry about. As if they'd actually go after people that don't have the required info. I'll be amazed if they actually do.
I run an adult site selling DVDs and I refuse to follow these rules, they can come after me if they want. I sell Japanese titles, how am I supposed to get the required information from companies? It's impossible!
Well thats the point, isn't it? The government knows the rules, as they stand, are nearly impossible to follow. The stated goal of "protecting our precious children" is the smokescreen to end all smokescreens. The gov't has perpetually failed on the obscenity front. So instead, screw the legitimate businesses, and in the process, screw the producers. If it weren't so horrifying and...I dare say UnAmerican...it would be brilliant.
At the same time that Extreme Associates got nailed in Pennsilvania. If you do a search for Adult DVD Empire and Pennsilvania, it should bring up the discussions.
They were "unnamed" in the Extreme Associates indictment. I think that they were referred to as a "major distributor". They were never indicted for anything, but they quickly got rid of any titles that had any chance of getting them in trouble.
DVD Empire is more than an adult DVD store. They are a large mainstream video store as well. It's just not worth it for them to take any chances.
On the same subject, but a different retailer, what's up with Jaded Video?
Assuming they are an FSC member, they've just bought time, not a pass from the new regulations. I can't imagine the scale of the effort they face in getting documents for all the titles they offer (and are still showing boxes for), the videos they stream and so on. Not to mention the data and physical storage issues they've got to solve.
Please keep in mind that each of these retailers may have different lawyers with very different opinions. Some of these lawyers may or may not have been in the room when for the negotiations with the DOJ in the recent settlement.
Any lawyer that's doing their job correctly is not legally allowed to advise their client to break the law. The stores that are displaying box covers most likely are doing so in direct conflict with any legal guidance they have have received. That said, the lawyers that were actually in the room doing the negotiations on behalf of the FSC know a whole shitload more about what's really going on. If a retailer is fortunate enough to have one of these guys on retainer then they may have information not available to other parties.
At any rate, if you're just learning about the 2257 changes now what rock have you been living under? This is a HUGE deal and we've been ranting about it daily since May in the forum.
I already know a fair amount about the new USC 2257 rules, and have contributed to this thread in the past.
My post about Jaded is two basic points:
1. The task of making a site with scope of Jaded's is truly monumental. How will they be able to cover it all? 2. I don't think the negotiations between DoJ and the FSC were such that people in the room felt that the new regulations were completely null and void, or, soon would be. So, what are they thinking with their current site?
I'm not speaking about any retailers in particular and personally don't care what Jaded is doing. My response is not related to Jaded in any way and wasn't a direct response to your post. If it was I might have quoted the particular parts I was responding to.
I am attempting to address the second guessing and comparing of various retailers that has been happening in a more general sense. It's pointless for us to make guesses as to why one store is doing one thing while another is approaching the new rules in a different fashion.
(Note that I left off the part specifically related to Jaded.)
FWIW, I know of one or more retailers/studios that have retained one or more of the attorneys that were directly involved in the negotiations. These companies have insight into the details of the proceedings that others do not enjoy. They are implementing their 2257 compliance plans based on info they have received from their lawyers. You might think I'm full of shit but that's fine. I don't really care. I'm just trying to shed a smidgeon of light on the reason(s) why retailer X is going about things differently than retailer Y.
I understand why sites like ADE have to do this but it really demonstrates what a joke the rewrite of this law is. You can't even look at scan of a box cover of an adult dvd on an adult dvd purchase site, without the government up your ass? What bullshit.
This might seem like sematics but it's a very important distinction. A law was not rewritten, an enforcement rule was rewritten. Laws are written by Congress. The rules for enforcing those laws are written by the DOJ.