DenverDon

[Link]

Gunther, -- there are only so many holes and so many ways to fill them, and so many ways to be nasty that don't scream "instant litigation" (or "call 911").

Men's reaction to erotic material wanes after multiple viewings anyway; that's why we get rid of old magazines. Oh, well, back in the day, that is. Now you get rid of your old DVDs because they don't grab you any more.

You know what's going to happen, it's just a question of with whom and what it looks like. Once you've seen a girl with white guys, uncut guys, black guys, dwarves, garden tools, etc. it's all just old hat.

Are you asking if the gangbang is that "pinnacle of prurience", like once you've jumped 32 parked cars on your motorcycle nobody cares if you ever jump 31 again?

I would say "no", there's always the all-black gangbang, or the oversized toys in every hole gangbang, or the "people in costumes" gangbang. You just can't tie anybody up and gangbang them, apparently. A B&D gangbang -- that'd trump a plain old gangbang, wouldn't it?

I agree that girls who start off doing profound oral and anal in their first scenes burn out fastest, as far as our collective porn consciousness. There's no buildup, nothing left to the imagination, no anticipation of acts to come. Why not just jam a dildo in each hole, dump a bucket of come on her and take a picture? Where's the romance?

I'll make even less sense if I keep going. *POOF*

[Link]

I'll just add this the coversation:

A pornstar I know of did everything a porngirl could do short of a gangbang. However, it is not like she never considered it. In fact, she all but signed the dotted line with one company to do one 3 years ago. She changed her mind and told me that when girls do gangbangs other companies see them differently. They might pigeonhole you into that category and suddenly the only work you might be able to get might be from the gonzo companies. It was not worth it to her.

However, this was 3 years ago. The business is vastly different now. Or is it?

Kelly

[Link]

I think its all "down hill" after a video like throat gaggers (which is a video I love to death) or gag factor is done. GBs used to be it, but now its the forced dt vids.

[Link]

I was trying to think of some examples myself but couldn't think of any better than yours, particularly Briana Banks.
I think we will also be adding 'Ariana Jollee' to this list next year. I think she's going to go from strength to strength and be absolutely huge in 2004....and that's after GBG 35.

Samurai Dai

Samurai Dai

[Link]

Taylor's been away for a few months now and some can't wait for her to get back. She's still as popular as ever.

I know that Taylor is a porn phenomenon but I believe this to be true for many other actresses e.g. Anna Belle, Ashley Long and Renee Pornero (Throat gaggers 4), Ashley Blue (Throat gaggers 3) and so on.

Samurai Dai

[Link]

Edited by - jonesy on 12/17/2003 2:15:57 AM

[Link]

Are you been serious or just trying hard to make a sacastic remark?

[Link]

I've been thinking about this -- what's the equivalent of "jumping the shark" in porn career terms? It sounds like, based on the very astute answers given, that it just depends on the girl. Well, hell! Of course it does!

Several of my favorites started off doing everything in their first scenes, and I damn sure didn't mind then, much less now.

[Link]

Edited by - hardcore on 12/17/2003 10:44:18 AM

[Link]

It doesn't have to have anal to make it a hot scene IMO. If there's chemistry between the performers and it is shot well, pussy only will work for me.

DenverDon

[Link]

Maybe this works with April - a girl everybody was used to get pussy-only for years until very recently - better. Her, I think I gladly take pussy-only again. But than I never was that a fan of hers.

I am curious how other feel about this question... (does that porn ladder of depravity exist?)

Edited by - Zander69 on 12/17/2003 4:14:12 PM

[Link]