Am I the only who thinks that it's annoying when so many scenes starts like this: The girl is on a coach and plays with her self and gets naked. Then all of a sudden 1 or 2 guys just steps in to the scene totally naked and with a big hard on. And the girl has not even touched them yet.
Why not let them undress each other and let the girl give the guys a hard on instead?? That would make things look lot more realistic IMHO.
i dont really want to see a guy undress (not sexy and a waste of time) but i like the idea of the girl getting the guy hard with her mouth- the dick growing from flaccid to rock hard in her mouth
It's just that every time a guy enters the scene with a hard on, I can only think one thing: VIAGRA. Off course the guy might just be horny, but I like it more when it's the girls hands or mouth that gives the guy a hard on.
I just would like a bit more variety. Off course we want the action to start but sometimes they are too much in a hurry because the scene only has to be around 20-22 minutes long.
I didn't mean that the guy had to undress himself. I like it when the girl is so eager to fuck, that she can't wait to get the pants of the guy and start to suck or fuck him and the other way around too. But if everybody is naked at the start it's not the same.
Heavenly Heavily Hootered Hos R Good 332 Posts 4/03
Posted - Jan 25 2007 : 6:36PM
Myself, I like to see the lady unzipping his pants, reaching in and feeling around, then pulling out her “surprise”. Makes her look sluttier. It’s ok if he starts out soft, but I like to see the lady rewarded for her efforts with a stiffy within a minute or so, and not be sucking away on a softie after an extended period.
However, if I were the male talent, and knew I would be working with some (not all, but some) of the current ladies of porn, I would have a hardon while brushing my teeth that morning.
I'm not really a big fan of watching every small detail of the process of undressing. It can be OK but there's a really find line between something that's hot and helps build a little anticipation of what is to come and a just plain annoying waste of time. Movies are only so long and when they spend 5-10 minutes just getting undressed and prepared for sex, I can't help but look at the time remaining and think "Damn! Stop wasting time, already!".
I actually prefer it when they spend just a little time setting up the scene with a relatively coherent plot of sorts and then cut to the action. Your mind can easily fill in the blanks. "Oh, OK...they got undressed and moved to the bed in the interim" It's not as if you can't guess what they did between cuts. Since there isn't a whole lot of kissing in porn, whatever they do whilst getting undressed just isn't significantly different then what they do when the action starts.
I would also prefer if guys come in with soft cocksand i can feel how they grow and get hard in my mouth for me its a big turn on to feel /see him growing cause of my hands/mouth....
I prefer scenes which start with teasing in the hallway....
The clothes on are fine when, they're standing up, and she reaches her hands down the front of his pants to jerk him, if she rubs her leg, or turns around to grind her ass against the front of his trousers. This, to at least justify the time involved with a complete unbuckle, zipdown, disrobe. Otherwise, IMO, males should just show up ready to work.
As for the inta-wood vs limp startups?
I believe theres moments in the beginning when she starts working his lifeless pecker, pulling on it with her lips pinched tightly around, stretching it out as if she were prepping a rubber balloon, that bode well for vicarious viewing. This captures a different visual phase of the act, that again imo, would be time better spent. Infact, time that could be re-appropriated from the excess footage, deepthroating notwithstanding, from the monotanous sucking, and gagging of herself, so commonly seen with hardened, dildo-like wood.
i like to see, how the girl gets undressed (if she not wears a ski or diving suit that would last half of a hour to put off. ok that "quite" rare in porn i agree :D )
I'm all for variety, of course, but I think performers just showing up buck naked at the start of a scene should be the exception, not the rule. They needn't take ages to undress, and cutting out bits of the process is reasonable, but it really establishes chemistry when someone is in a hurry to either get out of their clothes or tear off someone else's.
I've no real opinion on the soft-to-hard topic, except for the usual "variety is nice."
I hate that there's so little kissing in porn. Another easy but rarely-used way to make the chemistry believable...
Edited by - (Not His Real Name) on 1/26/2007 11:01:22 AM