New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Tiny Khloe: 2026 Exxxotica Interview

"I’m attracted to people’s intelligence. I like some substance. I want to be able to hold a conversation."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 828 > American made porn vs. Sexy lingerie
AuthorPost
curious
Member

uk
125 Posts
3/01
Posted - Nov 5 2001 : 7:17AM
I was wondering why it is that american made porn movies don't have women dressed up in sexy lingerie very much (especially stockings and other lacy undergarments). This is particularly true for 'all-sex' features, and nearly every time I see these I think that they could be so much sexier.

An example of what I'm talking about is in a Laure Sainclair movie I saw recently - The First Lady. I think its much sexier if the women are fully dressed at the start(say some sexy Ally McBeal Business outfit with short skirt and stockings underneath) and slowly reveal whats below.

Imagine if something like that was done in a gangbang girl movie - where the women's outfits are slowly peeled away. It would still have as much sex in it, but there would also be a lot of enticement as well.

Surely I can't be the only one that thinks this way - it seems so much sexier than a woman just getting naked straight away

dexplorer
Member

442 Posts
8/01
Posted - Nov 5 2001 : 10:17AM
Curious --

Some American porn does have women in sexy lingerie.

But I agree, it's certainly rarer than in European.

Maybe this is related to it's being called a "fetish" here to like looking at beautiful women being fucked with their stockings still on -- or skirts pushed up, ad opposed to completely removed.

Ridiculous to call that a fetish to my mind.

Fetish = weird = bad = don't think about going there, to most American men (or women).

Whereas nudity is natural = good.

Just musing away over here.




Jump To: