My personal preference is American starlets, because the culture divide between Europeans and the U.S. Despite historical ties, we are certainly a lot different. In American porn, you see a lot more of "girls next door", and girls that you couldn't really imagine doing porno, like a Kylie Rochelle, or a Kacey. They give good sexual performances, and they are into the sex. In European porn, the girls are positively stunning, and have amazing breasts and nearly flawless bodies (most of the popular actresses, that is). However, despite all the anal and hardcore action, it feels less than genuine. I don't know if it is the language barrier, or if European girls are really that jaded, but they always seem rather bored during the sex. Its without passion (never thought I would agree with anything Patrick Riley said). So for me, its nice to see these absolutely beautiful European starlets, but I would take an Ann-Marie, a Gen Padova, a Natalia Wood over a European anyday. My 2¢
Well said, Boney! My thoughts exactly. But let's beware of over-generalizing -- Michelle Wild and Laura Angel are undeniably both scorchers!
[Link]
Porn Scout Deactivated User
3735 Posts 10/02
Posted - Aug 21 2003 : 10:54PM
I prefer the European talent pool, but I like american porn better. I agree that the European girls sometimes look a little bored, but I've mostly seen that in Woodman stuff and not nearly as much in titles from RLD, Anabolic, Evil Angel and other US based companies. I was just commenting on this in another thread, but there are just so so many beautiful European hotties, it's just unbelievable. I'm surprised actually that more of them don't come over here to work since, as I understand it, they get paid a lot more in the american economy than in eastern Europe. I think Monica Sweetheart has it figured out. She comes over here once or twice a year, shoots a bunch of scenes, gets paid well because nobody seems to get tired of seeing her (including me!), and then goes back to Europe. Bobbi Eden is here right now for the month of August and it looks like she has a similar plan going. I'd be shocked if she isn't booked solid, especially since she does anal now. We'll see. When girls like that come over here, they positively outshine the American girls, at least in my opinion.
But I agree also that the American girls are somehow a little more "real" than their European counterparts. I think that's kind of what SyberScott's getting at. You see more girls in American porn that are like girls you might meet in everyday life, like it or not. Kacey is definitely one of those and I think Melanie Jagger is another. Watching one of these girls fuck makes for a somewhat different porn experience because there's that ability to relate that makes the fantasy somehow more accessible, or at least there's the potential for it to turn out that way.
Welcome to the forum BigBang. Unless someone in the US has a PAL capable DVD player and is purchasing European DVD's, I doubt whether he/she can get a clear picture of the European talent pool. Not to take anything away from Sbando Boy's fine index, but we only see a select few of the Euro-girls in action on the DVD's that are available State-side. Given the full range, I doubt you'd see much difference between the two.
He come on the most beautiful girls are european girls you can see it when you visit chechian republic, hungary, Italy, .... the most starlets from there look really natural draghixa, anita blond, bambola, lea martini.... AND THEY HAVE STYLE and look marvellous but when they wanna make career in usa the most of them wanna make their breasrs bigger, couse of the us market like draghixa, laetitia swiss i prefer good old europe and look at the girls from private they all come from eastern europe
That's a very good point. The Euro girls that we typically see in the US are typically the "cream of the crop" in Europe. Even the vast majority of PAL discs that I have bought contain the same level girls because I typically look for DVD's featuring girls who I have already seen in some US titles.
A friend of mine just brought about 50 PAL DVD's back from a business trip to Europe (Italy, Poland, Netherlands). He was just buying titles based on the cover. When you eliminate the 20 or so discs that actually contained US title, I would say that only 8 or 9 of the remaining discs featured any girls that I had any interest in watching.
European. American pornstars are usually strippers, etc. They remanufacture their breasts, dye their hair, trowel on the make-up, as well as accoutre themselves with tatoos and body metals. Even when a "girl next door" slips through she looks overly familiar to me, the genes of her ordinary parents repulsively evident not only in her looks but her character. I don't fantasize about whores or sisters, or gum-chewing mall-going air-heads. At least the Europeans keep me guessing.
I heard that Nikky Andersson is chicken-brained: does this stop me from adoring every pore of her flesh? Silvia Saint must have come from a better world. Michelle Wild, besides having a charming personality, has the most perfect breasts I have ever seen. And on and on.
used to be Euro girls hands down, but some of the new U.S. performers have impressed me. i'd say right now i'm about 50/50. i don't know about Euro girls being bored during sex, but they generally seem more laid back about it. in either case youre gonna find some cold fish and some sizzlers.
Chloe Temple Interview
Posted - Aug 21 2003 : 5:36PM