One of the first porn clips I ever saw in Uni had performers set against a pure white background/set. Two girls were side by side in doggy, and a nameless cock roared into one girl's anus, then pulled out and switched to the girl next to her.
I don't seriously expect anyone to ID this film, but seeing the intros to BIG WET ASSES I've realised how much better girls and sex in general looks against a white background. Kind of how a beef tenderloin cooked in coriander and garlic looks better when served on a large white plate.
I don't see white backgrounds during sex much, and I can't remember ever seeing more than the one scene with anal performed against a white backdrop. So if anyone can suggest scenes where we see this, please let me know.
I agree that white backdrops make women and sex look good. There's a Private movie called Dreams in White. I haven't seen it but the review and back cover pics suggest it would have some of what you describe. The review doesn't specify anal sex, but I think I've only seen one Private movie that didn't have anal penetration of any sort in it, and I must have seen a couple of hundred.
I just got The Private Life of Claudia Rossi, and it has her scene from Dreams In White. Yes, all white background and yes, anal. I'd bet there are other such scenes on Dreams In White.
Private's Dreams in White was one of the 10 top womens/couples adult titles for 2006 on another review site. This was one movie I truly enjoyed watching
I agree that a plain white background is a good idea. I mean, aren't we all tired of seeing the same houses, the same furniture and the same paintings on the walls? If you have the same girl and the same guy doing roughly the same thing in the same location on the same couch, are you really watching a movie that is different than one you've already seen?
Let's not kid ourselves. We're not looking to see these movies for the backdrop, but seeing the same backdrops and same houses gets old.
The problem with a pure, bright white backdrop is that it will cause the camera's shutter to close down quite a lot and the people will probably be little more than silhouettes unless the camera person manually opens the lens back up to the correct aperture.....at which point, the white backdrop will likely be overexposed and very prominent. The camera person will also need to monitor to the exposure level every time he moves the camera in the slightest.
I can't remember what the name of the movie is, but it was shot by Ninn Worx and I think it had Gauge doing anal with a white background. I think it is included in one of his available boxsets.
I think that's rather pessimistic. I don't shoot video, but with a still camera, all you have to do to correct for this is add exposure compensation and let the meter do the work. For a pure white background I'd dial in 1 to 1.5 stops of compensation and that should do it. This is obviously doable (being able to film against all white), as there are several titles mentioned here where this is done.
Yeah but those auto compensation things never work exactly the way you expect them to. Every video camera I've ever had had some sort of auto exposure and it was always easier than not to confuse it whenever a lot of bright white anything was in the frame.
I just don't think most pornographers are gonna bother with doing it right...or even halfway right and what you're gonna get is a bunch of anal videos filled with shadows that may or may not be fucking.
Anniversary Lessons - review by Captain Jack
Posted - Dec 31 2006 : 2:54AM