New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Audrey Madison Interview

"I really want even more DPs and double anal. And more gangbang stuff."
Participate...

log in
register
Browse...

Etiquette
Active Topics
Popular Topics
Member List
Search
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 287 > Anal tease, followed by pussy sex?
AuthorPost
Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jun 20 2012 : 9:54PM
A lot of porn movies nowadays show anal tease followed by pussy sex. And I'm still trying to understand the logic of this. Why have the lady tease the viewer with her ass, set the viewer's anal desire on fire, and then have this lady go for pussy sex with a guy?
It seems to me that many a viewer is bound to be disappointed with this turn of events. Because the lady's anal tease naturally makes the viewer want to see anal sex for the lady and not pussy sex. This is just common sense.
If the lady is going to have pussy sex first, then she should tease the viewer with her pussy first to prepare the viewer for it. And her anal tease should come next, if she is going to have anal sex next.
A good example of what I'm talking about is 'Ass Worship 13'. In every scene the lady teases you with her ass, there is anal play for her from the guy, and then he proceeds to have pussy sex with her, as if this is the most logical thing to do after preparing the lady's ass for anal sex. Eventually of course they have anal sex. But I still don't understand why go thorough all that trouble to arouse the viewer's anal desire and then proceed to have pussy sex with the lady, instead of anal sex?
In 'Evil Anal 14', Manuel Ferrara gets the sex sequence right in every scene. Because anal tease and anal foreplay for the lady is always followed by anal sex for her, instead of having her go for a pussy detour. And this film got rave reviews, which you can read at www.iafd.com.
But it seems that Manuel Ferrara got it right by accident and not by design. Because 'Evil Anal 15' shows the nonsensical sequence of anal tease followed by pussy sex for the lady. And the lone reviewer of this film is lukewarm about it. Which isn't surprising. Anal tease followed by pussy sex is bound to disappoint most viewers, even if later on viewers get to see some anal sex.
It doesn't make sense to set up the viewer for watching anal sex, and then play the switcheroo and show him pussy sex, and then finally show the viewer what he was expecting to see in the first place, which is anal sex. At the very least, this is a nasty kind of teasing, instead of pleasing the viewer.
Edited by - Dan on Jun 20 2012

[Link]
dmeister
New Member

Burr!
1 Posts
6/12
Posted - Jun 23 2012 : 12:56AM
While I find it disgustingly deceitful to follow an anal tease solely with vaginal sex, in some cases it makes a fair amount of sense to follow anal foreplay with vaginal sex. For it to really make sense I think you have to consider the alternatives. For example, I don't want to see vaginal foreplay, then vaginal sex, then anal foreplay before the anal sex... That would slow the scene down after the sex itself has actually started... way to ruin the scene...?
The only sound alternatives I can think of both have problems.. One is just to mix vaginal and anal sex together. While I've seen it done, I'm fairly sure there's an increased risk there for infections and such, so that's pretty much out as a standard. The other is to not put any vaginal sex in a scene beginning with anal foreplay. Now sometimes just anal can be great, but most of the time I'll take both over just one.
If you don't particularly like the progression from anal foreplay to vaginal sex.. you could consider it the least of several evils.
Burr!
Go To Top of page
[Link]
Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jun 23 2012 : 1:37AM
^
I think being misled and deceived even for a short time is no fun for the viewer. Sure, being deceived for 5 minutes isn't as bad as being deceived for the rest of the movie. But that 5 minute deception makes the whole movie a little disappointing for the viewer. Instead of rating the movie a 5 out of 5, the viewer would rate it a 3 out of 5.
I think the reason why many porn movies end up with this problem of misleading the viewers is that they label their movie as 'Anal'. So they start with ass teasing and anal foreplay for the lady to deliver on their promise of 'Anal' on the cover. But then going straight to the lady's ass after her anal foreplay seems too unnatural for film producers. There is still a kind of taboo against straight to anal sex for the lady. The proper etiquette seems to be pussy sex, followed by anal sex.
It's hard to break sexual traditions in porn. The tradition has been pussy sex first and then anal sex. And film producers blindly follow this tradition, even when the sequence of events ends up misleading and deceiving the viewer. That's what you get when people blindly follow traditions. Their behavior often becomes nonsensical, because they just follow established rules, instead of trying to achieve some purpose with their own planning and design.


Edited by - Dan on 6/23/2012 1:38:07 AM

Go To Top of page
[Link]
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 287Anal tease, followed by pussy sex?

Previous topic: Aiyana Flora New Girl In Town (topic moved)
Next topic: Looking for scene?



Jump To: