Poor Turkey running for her life with Christmas Hat 3713 Posts 9/01
Posted - Nov 6 2002 : 10:12AM
Snow was probably talking a thread I was having an extensive discussion in. I will pass on reviewing this title. Anyway I have too much work to do with moving my office, etc.
I've got to chime in here Ron I'm not really sure commenting on a companies release policy or talking about unrelated things are a fair assesment of someones work.
It was at the top of my hit list but after all the fucking about with release dates I just went ahead and ordered 2on1#12, sweet cheeks, un-natural 7, and a couple of others.
I kinda overdosed on Shyla, I think me and her need a break.
Poor Turkey running for her life with Christmas Hat 3713 Posts 9/01
Posted - Nov 7 2002 : 12:01AM
Not sure what that is all about?????????
My comments were simply, "Snow was probably talking a thread I was having an extensive discussion in. I will pass on reviewing this title. Anyway I have too much work to do with moving my office, etc."
Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service. 6409 Posts 11/99
Posted - Nov 7 2002 : 10:11AM
Pontus, you've made your point over and over again. Please stop. It isn't easy to constantly field criticism. Cal may not tell you what you want to hear, but he's here and he's obviously listening. Give him a break.
there's nothing wrong with Cal's reply here except that it's directed at the wrong person.
unless "Ron" is a nickname or alias for snowden
regarding criticism - i firmly believe that if you are in a position where you or your work benefit from widespread public exposure (especially those in the entertainment industry) you have to expect and learn to deal with criticism - LOTS of it. if you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen. with that said, Anabolic used to be one of my favorites. probably would be still except for lack of product (in DVD). you can't like whats not there.
Den Hardmans one of pornos unsung pork vendors I've seen the dude pull off some off the wall shit during G.B.s he even gives Everhard a run for his money in the one after another pop department "Super Dave".
Steph, that's not going to stop other people from criticizing Cal444 from time to time. If he continues to have a presence here, he's going to continue to have his feathers ruffled by ADT'ers with constructive criticisms. Also, does this mean that my freedom of speech here at ADT has been abridged and that I'm the only ADT'er now who can't ever say anything critical of anyone? Or critical of other people, but never again Cal444? If you go back and check, you'll see that Cal444 has taken a LOT of criticism from a LOT of ADT'ers. However, I don't ever recall any of them being singled out, admonished, or restricted for freely expressing their opinions, no matter how repetitive or disagreeable to you those opinions were or seemed. And so, StephDunn, if you can clarify for me how you wish my future conduct and postings to be, I'd really appreciate it.
And one final point, StephDunn. My persistence with Cal444 was created by his conduct. For example, if he had just ONCE addressed me by name and said something like "Pontus, thanks for your input; we'll take your suggestions under advisement," (and it wouldn't have even mattered if he meant it or not), then I would have go on my way a happy camper a long time ago. Did you notice the immediate and dramatic change in my attitude towards Wanker_Wang when he accepted valid criticism like a man? Wanker_Wang created that result with his conduct.
Pontus Here's the point, we've gotten way off the focus of this discussion group it's about porno, not the way I stand behind my work or the company I work for.
Pontus you're a porno afficianado and an adult video viewing god. I'm clay in your hands mold meeeee. Make me eat bag lady piss, what do you want?
Cal Somewhere thinking that if pro is the reverse con then wouldn't progress be the reverse of congress?
Okay, Cal444, I appreciate the above post more than you'll ever know. Maybe what I was really looking for deep, deep down was just plain old fashion R-E-S-P-E-C-T.
Hey Pontus, in case you didn't know or forgotten - ADT is Steph's baby and she will raise it anyway she wants to so please keep that in mind next time you address her...
Asmodeus, I don't think I was being disrespectful in any way to Steph in merely voicing my concerns. Think about it, Asmodeus, this is the good old U.S.A. There are many news reporters, for example, that are sometimes actually disrespectful when directly addressing the President of the country (and they're not thrown in jail or exiled, for example).
Now, if I had called Steph derogatory names or insulted her in some way or been hateful to her, then that would be a completely different story. In fact, if I had done that, I wouldn't even be making this post because I would have already been banned (and rightly so). I did nothing of the kind. Neither have I ever, for instance, violated any of the terms of use of this forum (except for when the flaming wars started in that infamous Marc Wallice thread--but then a great many of us lost it then). I DO respect Steph and everyone else here at ADT.
Anyway, as Cal444 observed, we keep wandering way off topic. I'm willing to drop this issue if everyone else is. Cal444 and I have already made peace.
Pontus I'm still an, inner ninny, my on line communication skills are infantile but I hope I'm showing improvement on a dialy basis. I someday hope to be a full fledged inner slut. I don't think there's a intermediate step between ninny and slut as far as the internet goes. We'll see.
Cal Somewhere getting more bllluuurrryyyy by the moment
Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service. 6409 Posts 11/99
Posted - Nov 8 2002 : 10:36AM
Pontus, I made a simple request for you to stop beating a dead horse. I did not say don't be critical. I asked you to stop saying the same thing over and over again. When someone's email address is readily available in the forum I discuss these things via email. Yours is not.
Freedom of speech does not apply to a privately owned message board. We're extremely tolerant here and almost never censor people unless their words put us at risk. But don't throw the freedom of speech crap at me.
Pontus, you may feel that you're not being disrespectful. But I don't think it's so difficult to just accept a request or decision I make instead of questioning it. Please understand that I don't have time to debate every request.
Pontus, You're heading down a real bad path making this argument here. Historically, this is one of the final (unsuccessful) arguments that most of the users who have eventually been banned from ADT have made.
Below is the reply that I previously made to an ex-ADT'er on this same topic
Nobody wants to see anyone banned from ADT. Nobody has asked you not to say anthing critical of anyone or any company. You have been asked to stop making the same point over and over and over.
When Steph asks you to do something, just do it. Don't argue with her. Don't fulfill your need to get the final word in. Just do it. It's that simple.
Edited by - Bill Broderick on 11/8/2002 1:31:00 PM