SleepCreep and Sleep Assault I always see banners for. Basically molesting sleeping girls. Pretty disturbing. Although I love porn a piece of me thinks that sites depicting the molestation of unconcious women should be illegal.
Funny . . . I had an interesting conversation not too long ago with the owner of a site talking about somnophilia and "sleepysex", and it rather opened up my eyes quite a bit as to the potential sexiness of it (I certainly have fantasies of feeling up sleeping men). In the end, though, however you feel, it's a fantasy, just like the rape fantasy sites. As for making it illegal, well, where to stop the censorship becomes an issue, as well as diving right into the whole question of why to ban something- meaning we'd have to buy into the disproven hypothesis that watching a depiction will incite the viewer to the actual act.
[Link]
Haze Deactivated User
769 Posts 7/04
Posted - Jan 22 2009 : 9:08AM
I'd usually stop at rape. Its kind of like how violent video games influence some kids to have violent behavior. So yea, rape and molestation bad. Maybe I'm old fashion though for thinking a woman should be willing and conscious to engage in sex.
I'd like to preface this comment by saying I have absolutely no interest whatsoever in sleep sex fantasies, or whatever you call them. I wouldn't have sex with a sleeping person if you paid me, and I have even less interest in watching it happen. Having said that, if your girlfriend tells you to fuck her while she's sleeping and then goes to bed, and you fuck her in her sleep, is it rape? What if she didn't tell you to do it? What if she did tell you to do it on Tuesday night, but didn't specify when you should do it, and you end up doing it on Wednesday night? What if she told you that in general she likes to be fucked in her sleep, but didn't explicitly say "fuck me in my sleep", and then you did it anyway? What if she told you she wants you to fuck her in her sleep in 2007, and then one day in 2009 you finally get around to doing it? Personally, I think there could be potential legal troubles in all of these scenarios.
Fat, drunk and stupid is no way to go through life, son. 1048 Posts 7/04
Posted - Jan 22 2009 : 3:28PM
The premise is so stupid I can't even begin to take it seriously.
[Link]
NewRomancer Deactivated User
under THEIR avatar 738 Posts 7/08
Posted - Jan 22 2009 : 5:45PM
In the movies it's fake.... everything is fake in movies... that's the whole point! In reality, it's the BEST way to wake up! Or are you guys gonna tell me that waking up to find you cock halfway down your womans throat isn't the best way to be woken up???? You never woke a woman up by licking her pussy like it had the cure in it?!?!
I don't even know where to start with this. So you're telling us that these sites are supposed to display affectionate and intimate couples who over the years have built enough trust to let the man stick his "cock halfway down a woman's throat" while she's sleeping? You'd have to be pretty deluded to think that "SleepCreep" and "SleepAssault" are about anything else than the simulation of ruthlessly exploiting and abusing unconsenting unconscious women for sexual pleasure. Obviously something that should not be allowed to be celebrated by being displayed on a purely pornographic level.
Looking at those sites, they don't appear to feature the kind of innocuous sleepy scenarios you're talking about. If anything, a lot of the scenes seem to play up the element of non-consensual molestation, with girls who are too drunk or drugged to wake up while their bodies are being used. I know it's not real, but it does make me uncomfortable. I wonder if this kind of thing would fall foul of Scotland's proposed extreme porn law? That makes it a sex offence punishable by 3 years in prison to own an image depicting non-consensual sex, even if it isn't violent... Edited by - Dave_K99 on 1/22/2009 7:15:44 PM
[Link]
Haze Deactivated User
769 Posts 7/04
Posted - Jan 22 2009 : 8:31PM
Lets be realistic. What girl would ever tell you to fuck her in her sleep? I've been with my girlfriend for three years and she's never asked. I usually have to nudge her to wake her up before I do anything. I've never needed sex so bad I needed to fuck her while she lay unconscious. Ever.
I don't know. I've done some sleepfucking (like sleepwalking) where I wasn't very conscious and neither was she. Almost like instinct especially if you're already naked from having sex while awake.
He was talking about the man being woken up by the woman (who presumably was awake) sucking on his dick. Big difference. I wouldn't even dream of sticking my dick into a sleeping woman's mouth. One *CHOMP* and I'd be eligible to be the new lead singer for Journey.
I find it really disturbing, I don't think it should be associated with porn. There are many things and acts in porn that I may find disturbing, but at least they seem to come from two consenting adults. this is definitely not the case for Sleepcreep and others like this. They give porn a bad name and give bad examples of how to take advantage of situations and people.
I don't want to take the position of being high and mighty. I'm certainly not going to cast any dispersion on what consenting adults decide to do in their spare time. However acts like this are what happen when people become jaded with "regular sex". The average porn offering nowadays offers up sex acts that if presented just 15 years ago would have been considered at least taboo if not obscene. Now I don't imagine that "sleepsex" or whatever the term for it is will become mainstream but the answer to this is simple. If you don't like it... don't buy it and don't watch it. If it doesn't generate revenue then it will shrivel up and die soon enough.
Which is not what the sites are about. It is something entirely different when sexes are switched, as in almost all cases of sexual activity. Men usually wouldn't mind having a strange hot girl suck their cocks in any given situation for no conceivable reason. Women pose almost no threat to men, both in terms of physical capability and potential malicious intent. Women, however, would feel violated because it is not usually assumed that a girl consents just because the guy looks good. That's the point of the sites. Perhaps he was implying that the sites are somehow OK, although his logic was rather faulty anyway. At the very best, his post has no relevance to the topic at hand. Edited by - unkwnusr2 on 1/22/2009 10:36:01 PM
i don't think this stuff should be banned, but since it's walking the line in terms of condoning illegal activity it should have disclaimers or before and after interviews like kink.com have to discourage psychopaths.
I can't believe this is even worth discussing. It's fake! Anybody who doesn't understand that is probably too young to watch porn in the first place. It's not appealing to me and I can't imagine who would find it appealing but as long as they aren't hurting anyone, it isn't my place to criticize what they jerk off to. Having said that, it's really stupid of the people who made that site. It sure doesn't help the image of porn or porn fans for people to think that is the kind of shit we get off on. Edited by - randomprecision on 1/23/2009 1:34:24 AM
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Jan 23 2009 : 3:02AM
I bet the dudes who made it don't even get off on it, they just figure they've found a kinky niche which may work. Anyone remember the scene in Reflections where Paul Thomas fucks a unconscious and drugged Annette Haven?
I've never been to SleepCreep, I have seen some "sleep porn" though and it is boring (the stuff I saw anyways). I don't think any of it should be banned though by any means. I do "sleep fucks" in my personal life with consensual adults.
I want girls to be into it, not lying there pretending to be asleep.
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Jan 24 2009 : 6:06PM
SleepCreep is one of my favorite sites. It's original, which is always a plus. And the girls are hot. Plus, if you're going to complain about sites like SleepCreep and SleepAssault, then you should also be complaining about series' like Good Morning Woody, and other porn movies/scenes that have girls initiating sex with guys while the guy is asleep. And Yes, there are plenty of them. But of course, it's only a problem if the girl is the one who is asleep, right? Know what I think should be illegal? People who tell other law-abiding adults what they can and cannot watch. People need to stop overanalyzing every damn thing. It's porn. It's fantasy. It's not real. It's not illegal, and it shouldn't be. If it bothers you, then don't watch it. But the last thing we need is more people advocating censorship everytime porn tries to do something original.
Shake for me girl... I wanna be your backdoorman ! 2776 Posts 10/07
Posted - Jan 24 2009 : 8:22PM
"Know what I think should be illegal? People who tell other law-abiding adults what they can and cannot watch." Such a simple true statement yet so difficult for some morons to understand.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Jan 25 2009 : 2:42AM
Who was advocating censorship here? And as I pointed out, since the same scenario appeared in a 1977 porno with one of the biggest stars of the era, I hardly see how the site is 'original.'
I also agree that child pornography should be legal.
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Jan 25 2009 : 9:09AM
That was one obscure scene that appeared in one obscure movie that was produced more than 30 years ago. By original, I don't mean that the act has never, ever been done before. The site is original because it capitalizes on a popular fetish that is not seen anywhere else in current mainstream porn. It's not the same thing that everyone else is doing.
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Jan 27 2009 : 12:00AM
Reflections and Annette Haven were far from 'obscure' at the time. It was also released by the biggest porn company of the era. Imagine if Belladonna did a 'sleepcreep' style scene for EA. That's equivalent.