Featured New Release
Box cover for Our Forbidden Trio
Our Forbidden Trio
Studio: Team Skeet
Release date: 7/27/2026


all new releases
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 866 > Are all Vivid DVDs edited and botched
AuthorPost
Pasky
Member

UK
29 Posts
12/99
Posted - Jan 7 2000 : 11:06AM
Forgive me if I'm wrong, I recently watched the DVD of this movie, and it appears to me to have been cut.
Three sex scenes with the gorgeous Christy Canyon, and all of them appear to fade out in the middle. Considering she's the star of the movie, has anyone noticed the absence of cumshots in all the scenes she appears in.
The only cumshots occur in all the sex scenes without her.
Is this an example of Vivid butchering the films for DVD release, or some other ominous form of censorship?
I've seen quite a few Vivid films on DVD, and compared to the VHS versions quite a few have been very disappointing.
Come on Vivid, what are you playing at. I would have thought that the DVD medium was an opportunity to present the movies as immaculately as possible, not the other way around. This is an insult to customers from companies that seem not to care what they release as long as it makes them money.
If this is an example of the product Vivid puts out, I'm not buying any more of their discs & keeping to their tapes.
Saki
At-Large

2087 Posts
11/99
Posted - Jan 7 2000 : 11:52AM
It depends on which Christy Canyon movie you're talking about (how about giving us the title?).
There are two issues here: one has to do with cable versions and the other is re-editing for DVD. Vivid is probably the most prolific provider of cable-ready smut than any other studio. Most of the features you see on Playboy TV, Spice, etc. are the softcore versions of their hardcore features. Often, directors will shoot additional softcore coverage to make up for the hardcore they take out. This is undoubtedly big money for Vivid. It stucks because they also release this stuff on DVD, and if the retailer doesn't tell you, you're often stuck with a disc without the naughty bits.
The other issue, which I hear every once in a while, is that some Vivid features (such as Masseuse 3) are significantly shorter than the VHS releases, even though they contain hardcore. I can't explain the rationale behind doing that.
Finally, a mini-issue is that Vivid retitles a few of their releases for DVD, changing the name of the video from what it was on VHS. Perfect example: The Show is now Sex Show and The Show 2 is now The Asian Show. It as if it took the marketing folks a couple of years to come up with a suitable title.
I'd like to know from Vivid what the reasons are behind the DVD changes...
Saki
------------------
[url=455144]My Adult DVD List</A (Updated 1/6/00)
Pasky
Member

UK
29 Posts
12/99
Posted - Jan 7 2000 : 2:08PM
Yes I'd love to know too, but they won't reply to my e-mails.
Oh yeah, the Christy Canyon film was "Victim of Love" on DVD.
Her Sex scenes were faded out about half way through, although they were hardcore (ie fellatio & penetration shots were intact), with the cumshots missing on all her scenes.
However, most of the other sex scenes had them left in.
I noticed Vivid released "Victim of Love" and "Victim of Love 2" on VHS. Both films seem to have exactly the same cast, the description of the plots sound similar, but the running times are different, as are the sleeves to both of them.
I wonder if the DVD was a re-edited version of both of these films. Not having seen them on VHS, I can't comment.
I know that "Lotus" was shorter on DVD than VHS. I'm not sure whether the extra running time on the VHS version was edited out and produced as the multi-angle option on the DVD.
Any thoughts?



Jump To: