First post...be kind. Searched and didn't see any discussion on this yet so thought I would mention something I've observed.
There are two kinds of pop shots...dribblers and shooters. By far I prefer to see a good shooter (yes, P.North rocks). I find sitting through an intense scene followed up by a very weak, single little spurt to be really disappointing.
It seems to me that almost every time I've seen a performance with an uncircumsized guy, they end with a weak dribble that usually just bubbles up a little bit and disappears in the flaps of skin around their unit. If it happens to be a girl jerking it into their mouth, sometimes you can't even see that the guy went off because there was so little of it that the girls tongue wiped it away too quickly.
However, usually the cut guys are the ones who can really fire one off with several blasts...its rare that I see a cut guy delivering a weak pop shot and I usually assume that its because its probably the second or third pop for that guy on that day.
I have nothing against uncut guys, but its gotten so that I almost purposely avoid their scenes because I know I probably won't enjoy the ending. Anyone else noticed this or have any thoughts on what might cause it? Why can a cut guy produce such a higher volume and so much more force (usually)?
Is there a link? I don't know if removed foreskin could make you a better shooter? I really can't say.
I know a strong PC muscle makes you a great shooter. Strengthen your kegel muscles (between scrotum and anus) and you will shoot bullets, especially if you are horny.
Stronger muscles make for a more forceful ejaculation. Now, if you already ejaculated twice in the same evening, don't expect the third ejaculation to be as forceful.
A weak cum shot is a major turn-off for me. A stud must shoot a forceful load for me to give the scene a good rating.
Sadly, Peter North is a rare stud. The man has it all between the legs: a fat piece of meat that shoots bullets. I can't say that for hardly any pornstuds nowadays. He's got a perfect dick for porn. Of all the big pornstars, men are most admirable of Peter North. Other pornstuds get little attention compared to him.
Yes, Ron Jeremy gets a lot because of his atrocious looks. I don't think he dick is that big, particularly his girth size. I love how fat dicks stretch out a pussy. Long dicks don't impress me in penetration shots, only fat stubs. That said, Erik Everhard's dick looks nice in a pussy.
Anyways, I have to say that Peter North fucking Tera Patrick makes for a hot scene! She has a beautiful pussy and a hot set of titties. I'd love to fuck her doggie-style.
I'm uncut but a better shooter than most porn guys. Unless the skin is in the direct way of the shot I don't think it should matter.
And girls should never jerk the guy off at the end, they always try to dodge the bullet it seems, taking it on the cheek, aiming it at the side so half of it hits the floor etc... very few girls do it properly.
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Mar 5 2006 : 6:43AM
Loud&Wet wroteI watch alot of European and Brazilian porn in which pretty much all the guys are uncircumcized, and quite a few of them have strong ejaculations. Since circumcision is not widely practiced outside of the States for non-religious reasons, you will see more uncircimcized guys in non-American porn than in American porn. Manuel Ferrara is one uncircumcized guy who comes to mind who has stong shots. I've seen scenes where he shoots the girl right in the face from almost a foot away, and in multiple shots too. There are lots of other uncircumcized guys with strong shots as well. If you watch mostly American porn, you're not likely to see alot of uncircumcized guys in the first place, so the amount of them who are uncircumcized AND have strong cumshots is of course going to be even lower.
Being uncircumcized myself, I prefer seeing scenes where the guys are also uncircumcized, though it doesn't really make all that much of a difference as long as the scene is good. But when I first started watching porn and saw all these uncircumcized guys, I kept wondering what was going on with all these dudes not having foreskins. But then, when I got into watching non-American porn, and I realized that America is the only nation in the world that has this fixation with circumcizing their infant boys, I started leaning more towards non-American porn (or non-American actors rather), while also secretly being thankful to my parents for making the right decision (as far as I'm concerned) to not circumcize me.
As for Peter North, he does have strong shots, though he has repeatedly openly admitted to taking pills which increase the force of his ejaculations. He says he's been taking them for years and is now advertising them at the beginning of his movies. I don't know how many other porn guys may be also taking aids for this as well.
Cut / Uncut makes no difference. Prostate gland size can reduce force, pc muscle strength, amount of time from last shot, last but not least- the amount of time you had to delay the load being shot to satisfy the director getting all of his footage.
Not only are circumcised guys better shooters, they are better lovers, have more stamina and their sperm is much more likely to produce male offspring.
Furthermore, they are smarter, wittier, and faster runners. They tend to be stronger as well as better suited to solving complex tasks. They make better professional athletes in all sports, and better astronauts as well.
All in all, shedding that pesky foreskin frees a man to reach his full potential.
Foreskin all the way baby. I can't imagine my cock without its foreskin. I have so much sensitivity down there. I get intense orgasm when a girl gives me head. Just having a girl lick the head of my penis gives me a lot of pleasure. So don't hate on the foreskin.
That's funny. Is anyone else seeing the sarcasm, and the inherent sillyness; of a bit of sensitive skin at the tip of the penis having any bearing on muscle strength, prostate glands or anything related to shooting?
www.alexandrabelle.com / www.lance-strong.com
[Link]
The Dude Deactivated User
In the Sex Palace 228 Posts 2/06
Posted - Mar 5 2006 : 5:41PM
Peter North is not the only guy who shoot big creamy load, there Jules Jordan that do it too, most of his shot equal PN. Sure they are not a big bunch of this type sadly but well as long as the shot is satisfying like Travis Knight(Gina Lynn`s man) or Randy Spear have a nice one.
I don`t know about cut or uncut, personally i am uncut and i shoot a decent load in my opinion...
I hapen to notice personally that size of the dick don`t matter with size of the pop
I say it makes no dif because the skin comes back when it gets hard anyway. Both foreskin styles are welcome in my mouth and my experience with both has varied in load.
This is true -someone at Harvard did a study and these were the results. The study was sponsored by Bill Clinton and Jesse Jackson in the spirit of interracial harmony.
I can't speak for other uncut men, but I've found that during an erection the head pops out of the foreskin like a guy putting on a turtleneck sweater. So the foreskin isn't an issue at all.
circumcision is a deformity. Men are born with a foreskin and probably there is a reason for it (not only the fun to play with it). Strange enough most circumcisions are done for religious reasons. I wonder how people who believe in creation try to improve god.
I'm uncircumcised and I'm a dribbler. Does somebody really think it would change my cum if I get a circumcision tomorrow?
BTW Manuel Ferrara is uncircumcised and he is one of the most powerful shooters I know.
Steve Holmes
Edited by - Steve Holmes on 3/8/2006 9:11:08 PM
[Link]
realtip Deactivated User
2301 Posts 6/04
Posted - Mar 9 2006 : 12:35AM
Steve Holmes wroteHey, that's what I said. Apparently, I'm not the only one who noticed this.
As has been already stated, the foreskin (or lack thereof) has no effect whatsoever on shooting strength. I completely forgot that the foreskin doesn't even cover the glans of the penis anyway during an erection until others pointed it out.
Certainly I wasn't suggesting that 100% of all uncut guys are dribblers, there are exceptions to every rule...there's obviously some cut guys who are mostly dribblers as well (Randy West was my first thought). Its just something I picked up on that I thought was odd. I don't think that anyone could be changed to a shooter overnight by having a circumcision done, but I do wonder about when it is done at birth, and how that affects the development of the shaft and muscles of that area over the course of a lifetime. Is it possible that it has some effect on shooting ability? I'm not a doctor, but hey, just about anything is possible. Just a little something to think about next time you're watching a scene with an uncut guy...I'd say there's a significant chance it will end with a dribble. Then again, I'm only seeing a small sample of subjects since porn industry guys are the only ones I've ever seen blow a wad, so maybe its just these particular performers?
As for it being a deformity...well, there are obviously strong feelings on both sides about it. I wasn't trying to address the reasons for doing it, only the possible affects of having it done.
I can't see any reason that cutting a tiny bit of tissue off the end of one's penis is going to cause a muscle in the perineum to develop differently.
I would venture to say that most of that "dribbling" you see in porn is caused by the simple fact that the body takes time to build up a "load." If a guy's doing scenes too frequently then there's never going to be a full load there for him to shoot.
I've only been taught how to do it as a woman (well, cuz I am one), but I assume it's the same for men: When you're peeing, pee intermitently, that is, stop yourself from peeing mid flow and then let it go. Do it a few times.
Nothing says I love you so much as a tongue in the ass. 2884 Posts 1/03
Posted - Apr 13 2006 : 7:02AM
It's the PC muscle, and kegels are the name of the exercise. You don't have to be peeing to exercise the muscle. It's just squeezing it the same way you would if you're trying to cut off the flow.
Having a strong PC muscle can help you control the quantity of your ejaculate and help you to release when you want. I have a strong PC muscle according to the tests and I still don’t have a lot of strength behind my ejaculations. I don’t dribble as such; they are just not very strong.
The exercises described here probably only help to a certain extent. I can’t imagine it making a very noticeable difference, unless it is just me.
I remember a while ago watching a M/F scene. They where in the 69 position on a sofa, (guy underneath) I think the guy had black or dark hair and the woman on top was blond. When the guy ejaculated on the woman’s face, it was the most spunk I ever saw leave a cock, about 10 – 15 very strong shots. I had no idea ones balls held so much cum. That is the only time I have seen such a thing.
