On the licking stick, Mr. Magic Dick! 3309 Posts 2/09
Posted - Jun 24 2010 : 10:44AM
Here's an excerpt from a recent review of mine furthering proving the gayness factor: At other times we have more of the guys in the shot than the girl during the short blow banging segments, the camera man is shooting from about ten feet away so no real close-ups. Dude; point the camera so you’re focusing in on cocks in the girl’s mouth! Throughout this, we have a lot more guy in the scene than girl. Several examples to note; at one point during Julie Night’s scene we have a guy to the far left and Julie giving him head. The only thing we can see of Julie is her hair and the back of her head. However; in the other ¾ of the screen, we can see all the other guy’s jerking off to stay hard. Also during Julie’s scene the guys go straight to the A for a DAP. No DP but we go for DAP. WTF?? Then the camera shot is from behind the guys, so we see two black guys DAPing a white girl, but 98% of the bodies on display is black guys. If I didn’t see a thin line of white girl in the pile, I’d think I picked up black guy gay porn. To recap; a back of a girl’s head and clear view of guy’s jerking off, and DAP only, no DP and the camera shot is only of black balls and asses. MMMMMM me thinks that either the director and camera man are complete amateurs or gay;
Mason/Sam No is great (but female, so a little off topic) - Kathryn Bigelow of porn Mike Quasar is the Martin Scorsese of gonzo porn. Willima H. is the Stanley Kubrick (mercurial and brilliant)
I'd love a version of Porn "Medieval Times" a group of people would engage in an orgy, while we all ate chicken with our hands and drank mead! Very Charles II
Wielding a sword without fear of it is to be unworthy of the blade. 1441 Posts 5/10
Posted - Jun 25 2010 : 12:17AM
^ Lol Crimson Rain...What A Sight
[Link]
john_qyoo_public Deactivated User
265 Posts 7/05
Posted - Sep 4 2010 : 10:13PM
I have to agree. The gay thing is projection from the viewers; if you're a heterosexual man in the process of masturbating, and some stupid asshole puts a man's orgasmic face right in the spot where you were just watching a beautiful woman fucking, you feel gay, much as a heterosexual man might if you could instantly transform the beautiful woman he's buttfucking into a man. It's natural for viewers to project this onto the director.Yes, the idea that homosexual men are incapable of understanding what works for heterosexual men isn't without merit, but it's not definitive, either. Homosexual males are prominent in a lot of artistic fields. I don't believe in coincidence. No, it's just about teh suck. Big market, low barriers to entry = lots of talentless hacks cashing in. And I don't care what anyone says, the most plausible explanation for why the upshot dominates porn because camera guys are lazy. Which is too bad for their employers, because men, by and large, want to be dominant (downshots), not dominated (upshots). And don't even get me started about the power of the DVD, and how little producers do to take advantage. Why don't they use the power of multiple angles? Are Blu-Ray producers doing this yet? There's a hell of a lot of space on a BRD. Why don't they let me turn off the cheesy music their cousins made? Why don't European producers at least let us switch to the original soundtrack? I don't care if they're speaking Swahili, it's got to sound better than those horrible dubs. To the guy who says "homophobes" are homosexuals: https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/forum/topic.dlt/whichpage=1/topic_id=139279/forum_id=1/cat_id=1/139279.htm So black guys are way more homo than white guys? Edited by - john_qyoo_public on 9/4/2010 11:02:40 PM
looking at the title, I think a "pure" hetrosexual movie can only be made when we cast the "hollow man". Otherwise there will be a MAN visible in the film!!!! and the movie, its director, its actors,crew and audience will become completely gayyyy!!!
