All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 216 > Are pornstars less promiscuous than the average pe
AuthorPost
xDEFiLED
Member


171 Posts
3/12
Posted - Oct 26 2014 : 10:03AM
Considering that pornstars need to be free from STD's in order to be able to keep their career going, does this mean that active performers are less promiscuous and less sexually active with alot of different people in their personal lifes? Do pornstars in general prefer having a steady relationship, rather than having one night stands? Because a one night stand with the wrong stranger might cost you your career.
Of course one might assume that pornstars fuck alot on a daily basis in their private life too, but are they more "responsible" in their thinking, to have a handful of steady sexual partners or fuckbuddies, rather than fucking around with lots of people?
EDIT: I'm talking about pornstars in their private life, how promiscuous they are in their private life compared to the average person. Of course a pornstar can sleep with 10 people on camera in a week, but what my question is referring to is their behavior off camera in their personal life. Sorry if i didn't make that clear
Edited by - xdefiled on Oct 26 2014
CummingLinguist All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11
Posted - Oct 26 2014 : 10:41AM
You've basically asked a question that could only be answered with statistics, and the problems inherent in actually answering it are so huge, that I would say, the question is not answerable.
1) How do you define "promiscuous'? By counting the number of sexual encounters a person has in a week? The number of partners? The variety of sex acts they engage in? (For instance, a person who decides to have sex with a one-legged transsexual midget just because they are curious to find out what it is like might be judged more promiscuous than a person who has a threesome because their partner really wants it, they love their partner, and they want their partner to be sexually happy.) Would a person who pays another person to watch him/her masturbate on webcam be more promiscuous than a person who performs the exact same act for hundreds of paying viewers? Does it matter how his/her partner feel about webcamming? Is promiscuity a derived statistic that combines a number of other statistics?
2) What do you mean by "the average person"? Do you mean the average human being living on the Earth? The average young adult living in Los Angeles? What about other factors: For instance, I would imagine that the average porn star doesn't come from a family that could afford private school, SAT tutors, college, and medical school all while providing an allowance to cover rent and day-to-day living expenses. Do you control for socioeconomic factors? Do you control for religion?
3) Finally, how would you collect data? The average porn star may be more likely to answer a survey accurately than the "average person". This possibility alone might make any serious inquiry meaningless. (Keep in mind, the average virgin may be as likely to lie as the average slut.)
Even if you could overcome these hurdles, there might be a more interesting question than whether the averages between the two populations ("porn stars" and "average people") differ. I suspect that if you came up with some way to measure "promiscuity", you might find that the averages differ much less than the amount of variation within each population. In fact the porn star population may be heavily "bimodal" with distinct groupings, some porn stars may not be at all promiscuous in their personal life, but those pornstars who are somewhat promiscuous may be extremely promiscuous.
But anything we might say on the matter would be little more than guesswork, and I don't think the question can be answered.
pat362
Senior Member

10083 Posts
3/10
Posted - Oct 26 2014 : 11:03AM
^^Do you know the definition of promiscuous? In case you don't then here you are: Having casual sexual relations frequently with different partners.
I don't know but that pretty much describes what porn performers do for a living. The only exception are performers that only have sex with their significant other. There are so few of those that you can actually discount them.
I'd like to know where you got the idea that performers need to be free of STI's to work because I'm pretty sure that a large percentage of performers have herpes. This is still an incurable disease which an infected person can pass on to a sexual partner without even knowing it because they themselves don't know they have it. The only thing a performer with herpes has to avoid is shoot porn while they have an outbreak. Otherwise it's business as usual.
Take a look at the below link to a recent article by the LA Weekly in which they comment on a study the UCLA did on STI's and the porn industry.
http://www.laweekly.com/informer/2014/06/10/1-in-4-porn-stars-has-gonorrhea-or-chlamydia-ucla-study-says
Edited by - pat362 on 10/26/2014 11:04:14 AM
hoochimama
Deactivated User

1437 Posts
5/10
Posted - Oct 26 2014 : 12:18PM
Is the OP an alias for Killer John? I mean the average incall escort has multiple callers every day, it's a revolving door.
"Gee, I wonder how much sex she has after she finishes her daily 12 man shift?" : how does such a question even begin to cross someone's mind?
Yeah, I'm sure they wouldn't dream of doing anything that could jeopardize their potentially life-long careers in porn, certainly not for the sake of having a personal love/sex life! When you're looking forward to a scheduled gangbang creampie shoot with 6 hobos you certainly don't want to risk it all by sleeping with a civilian you like beforehand!
Clearly any responsible pornstar, when faced with the possibility of potentially contracting a deadly and incurable STD by choosing to sleep with an untested person, has to be thinking of what's best for the industry first, her fans second, and her own self third! Yup, those are the priorities.

________________________________________________
Please ID these girls from PlayboyTV's Foursome show
Edited by - hoochimama on 10/26/2014 1:59:09 PM
mharris127
Senior Member

1844 Posts
8/09
Posted - Oct 26 2014 : 3:18PM
There are some porn performers that won't have sex with anyone without a recent VD screen (like Isis Love). There are others that only have sex with a few different people outside of work. Then there are some that fuck just about anything that moves (Bree Olsen was rumored to fall into this category, mainly because of the posts on her Twitter feed in that vein although I think she lied about half of her sexual activities because they were so farfetched). I think although some (again, like Isis Love who won't even kiss a guy without a VD screen) think about protecting the industry in their personal sex lives most do not and (at least on days off of work) do what they would if they weren't performing in porn whether not fucking at all, only fucking his/her spouse/steady beau, having a few fuck buddies, moonlighting as prostitutes or being total sluts/gigolos.
As for promiscuity, using the general definition that anyone fucking outside of marriage is promiscuous and the more partners in a given amount of time (say a month), the more promiscuous I think since porn performers necessarily don't have the hang-ups about extramarital sex that many in the general population do I think porn performers would be (in general) more promiscuous than the population of the Western world as a whole even excluding sex on the job.
 
xDEFiLED
Member

171 Posts
3/12
Posted - Oct 26 2014 : 9:41PM
I'm talking about pornstars in their private life, how promiscuous they are in their private life compared to the average person. Of course a pornstar can sleep with 10 people on camera in a week, but what my question is referring to is their behavior off camera in their personal life. Sorry if i didn't make that clear
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 216Are pornstars less promiscuous than the average pe

Previous topic: ID on Airtight girl
Next topic: Active now who'd be n your all-time top 50



Jump To: