bigbadwolf16669 to answer your question. I watch about 3-5 movies a week. I'm a member of two(exclusive content) pornsites. No porn magazines.

-PornoPunK

[Link]

Since I'm not in the porn industry, I haven't a clue why this is.

For myself, the only times I've mentioned any woman is when I've felt her performance was great - I really don't care what they look like, or how well their body parts all go together. That's not my interest.

On the other hand, I've posted over and over again about certain actors, what I like about them, what I like about their looks and their style, what I wish was different, what kind of work I wish they would do more of.

To be honest, all this lesbianism is just a big bore to me. I fast forward through any lez footage whenever I come across it.

[Link]

DenverDon

[Link]

Edited by - lindi on 6/26/2004 10:43:40 AM

[Link]

Most women in these studies deny they are aroused when their physiological markers shows otherwise. Anthropolgically, it is useful for males to denigrate females for being promiscuous as condemnation serves as an attempt to reduce the possibility that a man is expending precious resources to rear what may not be his genetic makeup.

For women, society conditions them to follow this as once she is pregnant it is considered less useful to continue to be promiscuous. Some hypothesize that some women do not like women who are promiscuous as if men can more freely engage in physical pleasure, some women perceive a potential loss in the ability to manipulate men via the rationing of pleasure.

The near universal claim by U.S. women that womens bodies are more artistic then mens is a uniquely American construct, as Euopean women LOVE mens bodies whereas women who allege heterosexuality here make fun of athletic guys in speedos.

It is remarkable that male homosexuals appreciate the male body and the apperance of a guys gear more then most allegedly heterosexual women .

Edited by - luke hanson on 6/27/2004 12:14:17 PM

[Link]

To get a better take on what women porn fans respond to when watching films, go and read the reviews that a couple of us have written. There are mine, and quite a few from Dumblonde, lindi, and Yogagrrl. I think you'll find that there's mainly an emphasis on the hotness and authenticity of the performances, rather than how "HOT" a male or female performer simply looks.

I would say that Luke Hanson is pretty much on the mark in his post. It is way more socially acceptable for men to say they are aroused by visual images than it is for a woman to say so. All that social conditioning has an effect, after all.

And yet..... companies that make underwear for men know that, at least in the US, a majority of it is bought by women, for their husbands, partners, boyfriends, etc. A good reason why they use those sexy-looking male models on the package covers. It's not like the women making these purchases don't notice that tall, slim, muscular guy in his Calvin Kleins.

Believe me, if someone asks, I can tell them what brand of underwear Nacho Vidal, Rocco Siffredi, Michael Stefano and Erik Everhard wear (it's plain for anyone to notice in their films).

[Link]

To add, we who study behavioral anthropology know that human females are designed to be promiscuous partially proven by the fact that male humans are usually unaware when a human female comes into estrous.

Other unmistakable clues are the end of a guys dick with the forward tapered geometry of the glans and the coronal ridge geometry are designed to act as a semen removal suction device.

We would not be adapted geometrically as such if women were monogomous as natural selection usually does not occur if a trait servess no purpose although clearly there are exceptions.

[Link]

I think the thing behind guys watching two feminine women go at it is guys see two women engaging in sexual abandon, and there are no issues of competing with other males to cross the viewing male's wires....and it is double the visusal stimuli.

But I agree, most but not all women I know aren't into watching two women.

[Link]