Poor Turkey running for her life with Christmas Hat 3713 Posts 9/01
Posted - May 18 2005 : 10:34AM
Don't get this title . What you see isn't what you get. There is a dp or dap scene in the rear box cover with Bibi Fox and that part of the scene is totally missing; the second guy was eliminated completely so this is a one-on-one scene. The promo says something about dp's that is a figment of the editor's imagination; no dp in the entire DVD. The Angel Dark scene looks like there is a potential dap that got censored. I am pissed off at the way this title got butchered at the editing, probably by a editor who wants to censor JVLC. I beiieve that JYLC had good vision but the editor killed it completely.
If Digital Sin wants to have a wholesome product and remove all dap's, just say so and I will not buy their titles. This is a second or third dap, that digital sin has censored out (Melissa Lauren's dap in Anal Retentive 4 is in the box cover but censored out of the DVD).
I will stop buying Digital Sin because of their policies.
Ron
[Link]
buffi Deactivated User
100 Posts 1/05
Posted - May 18 2005 : 10:43AM
ronk you are right besides your described missing scenes i have also not seen the famous beam (gugg mal) position scene with bibi fox and probably nice gape shoots the same shit as usual with new sensations,digital sin
Thanks for the info, Ron. I have taken AWO #3 away from my to buy list.
This is the second time in a few weeks that Digital Sin promise something on the cover, which isn't on the DVD (the last time this happened, was in Pleasure Of The Flesh #10). Seems they don't want DPs and DAPs in their movies, or the editor simply is crazy.
I will also stop buying movies from them. When one hand (the person who creates the cover) is not knowing what the other hand (the editor) is doing, and nobody cares for the whole product to eliminate such mistakes before it is released, this is a sign that such a company only wants our money. But not with me any longer. Enough said!
Poor Turkey running for her life with Christmas Hat 3713 Posts 9/01
Posted - May 18 2005 : 11:14AM
I can think of 3 reasons. 1. The editor hates daps. 2. With the current political climate, DS may have decided to exclude daps. 3. DS just wants a softer/kinder image.
Reason 3 is unlikely because the dap picture is in the rear box cover. Anyway, there is no excuse at this point. I should be getting my money back for 2 titles.
Poor Turkey running for her life with Christmas Hat 3713 Posts 9/01
Posted - May 18 2005 : 11:49PM
The current attorney general has started a morality commision of somesort. Maybe, the person in charge of Digital Sin believes that by excluding dap's, they will be okay. But why then have a dap in the box cover????
And why paying the girl the extra bucks for the DAP if nobody ever can see it? That's a waste of money!
Maybe they think it's a better advertising with a DAP on the box cover, so that more people will buy it? But how stupid must someone be to buy DVDs in the future from a company which cheat the consumer again and again. In the end I hope they get their punishment in less sales.
This is nothing new for DS, I have stopped purchasing their titles completely. I now only rent DS titles, and only JYLC titles at that. They arent even what I would call hardcore anymore, considering all the content out there now from RLD, Platinum, Evil Angel, and 3rd degree.
Audrey Madison Interview
Posted - May 17 2005 : 9:30PM