If you've been following the 2257 threads, then you know that there's a link in one to an article where a company specifically says that some of its sites are not compliant yet and people will be redirected from those to other sites that the company owns until they become compliant.
Not really. Just enough to know that they are there, but not enough to try to get all the details.No, I didn't.But that isn't the question. We are wondering if some that attempt to visit a site - not all - can be redirected. And if that determination on whether or not to redirect can be done by one's geographic location.
I don't wanna go offtopic, but it's totally possible, Google uses it, if none US google user goes to http://www.google.com he/she is redirected to google.dk, google.de, google.no, google.fi, google.se, google.fr or whatever his/her country is.
I wanna add this... that Google does not care what my browser language is. I have used English Firefox versions and when i go to Google.com i always get redirected, it truly looks what my geographic location is. I can still use Google.com, there is "Google.com in English" link, then Google.com goes to Google.com, unless i clear my cookies.
You have to register using a credit or debit card, which isn't charged. Then you can see the screenshots.
Quick check to see if you can't (hopefully it's not against the rules)...Once clicked on, can you see these screenshots from the DVD, "Tic Tac Toes"? Or are you asked to log-in?
If it's the latter, then yeah, you need to register to view them. If you CAN see them, then I'm guessing that by posting a direct link to those images, it's a breach of the forum rules - and, rightly so, will mean the link needs to be deleted.
Well, there's the answer - removed by the forum software.
Basically, if you know the right image link for screenshot pictures, you can view them regardless of whether you're logged in or not.
To get those links, however, you need to have members' access - to retrieve the proper link(s). I don't think you can mix and match the URL's using the product number any more.
My post from this topic: "avfantasy.com There is [Screen Shot] link under boxcovers (you must make search), if you only see Frontcover, then there is no screenshots. I did use Anonym.to service with this avfantasy -link, because i don't want them to know that this topic is here. if this free thing is error, because i think they did have some Credit Card check in past, or i have just been blind."
I did use same avfantasy.com Western site before, but sometimes site language was not English, it was Japanese?, and my browser does not understand those letters, so some letters then were just question -marks, Title and Company names were right, but like [Screen Shot] -link was "[ ?????? ]" And sometimes i was lazy, why change site language, if i can find what i'am looking for.
English link they have on Front page goes to Japanese site with English language, and there's only few Western porn titles.
Link i did give above goes to right place (Western site, and language is English.)
I can't really see this. There's no end of free porn on the web as it is, and having a net.wank is something you can do on the spur of the moment, right now. Buying or renting a dvd requires either peeling your ass up off the computer chair and going outside, and ordering it on the internet means a minimum of a couple of days.
Speaking for myself, at least, a lot of screencaps can make me not buy a DVD, but that's only based on seeing if a scene (or a majority of them) look like shit that's not worth paying for. Conversely, if the scenes look great, then it moves a particular title from "Maybe, well, it seems like it might be good" to "gotta get XYZ!"
IMO if your product has quality and that quality is shown in the caps, then you have nothing to worry about.
absynth makes the heart grow fonder 434 Posts 8/06
Posted - Nov 18 2006 : 3:18PM
I usually won't buy a film today without seeing a handful of screen shots or a trailer. Actually, I prefer to watch it PPV/VOD and then I'll buy it if I like it. I do make a few exceptions, because I know what I'm getting with certain companies/directors/stars.
demicomix.com Carnal Comics - True Stories of Adult Film Stars 105 Posts 6/04
Posted - Oct 24 2011 : 4:27PM
I find it interesting that Aiden, in 2005, was concerned about people masturbating to screenshots rather then buying a porn movie. Free porn is now a much bigger problem. We now have tube sites and torrents cutting down the profits of porn companies on a massive scale. There is a tube site that breaks down scenes in to 4 or 5 minute increments. On average, there are 3 increments for each scene. When you add it all up, that is 12 to 15 minutes of a movie. There are x-rated companies that are approving this. There are also companies allowing tube links to be up that are under 10 minutes. In the 1970s and 1980s, many entire scenes were under 10 minutes! To me, showing trailers instead makes sense because trailers average 1 to 2 minutes. You see enough to wet your appetite without completely satisfying it. Aiden had a point that you can masturbate to screenshots but people seeing moving and talking images is a much bigger problem. http://www.demicomix.com/Carnal01.htm http://groups.yahoo.com/group/carnalcomics