good luck
| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| flow Member 31 Posts 7/04 | Gentlemen: I find it great that obviously more and more so called videographers come back to show the actress: 1. Only half naked! Is it really so difficult to understand, that all the millions of porn fans, they look at porn because of the actresses and not why there are genitals slipping in and out only a few inches away on the tv-screen! The nicest girls with figures one can only dream about and sexy like hell, they wear something around their belly. Why???? Is porn going back to middle age? [Link] |
| MASAMUNE Senior Member 1452 Posts 12/04 | |
| Hardware All-Star Member Your other left 14594 Posts 3/02 | I do agree with you that shot selection often leaves something to be desired. I'll spare you my pet theory on why we get so many close-ups, though. |
| Loraine Senior Member 1559 Posts 3/04 | |
| Hardware All-Star Member Your other left 14594 Posts 3/02 | Editorial preferences aside, I suspect that close ups also cover a multitude of sins. When the camera includes people's faces and more of the 'room' then it increases the possibility of problems with the shot. After all, you don't have to worry about a cock or a cunt being 'on,' but you might find your favorite actor is checking his watch if you could see the entire set through the lens. You might find that your favorite actress is glaring at the PA. You might see, as I recently did in a Vivid movie, people wandering around in the background, for no apparent reason. Basically, I think that the number of people performing in front of and behind the camera in porn would be seriously reduced if not for the prevalence of the close-up. Of course, having said that, it amazes me the amount of crap that gets left in many movies, so what do I know? |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |