Featured New Release
Box cover for Chloe Cherry Is Euphoric
Chloe Cherry Is Euphoric
Studio: Team Skeet
Release date: 7/28/2026


all new releases
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 581 > Back to bad habits
AuthorPost
flow
Member


31 Posts
7/04
Posted - Mar 20 2006 : 4:12PM
Gentlemen:
I find it great that obviously more and more so called videographers come back to show the actress:

1. Only half naked!
I suggest to film them fully dressed, with only a little hole. The companies will thank that, because they can only have one slut for all their films!!!
2. mainly close ups or so near, one has only the imagination of the girl who is behind!
I suggest to put the lense on the skin (see above!) you can guarantee that nobody is offended and it costs less money!!!
3. at least half of the time stroking or oral!
perhaps one way to avoid aids. Really thoughtful!!

Is it really so difficult to understand, that all the millions of porn fans, they look at porn because of the actresses and not why there are genitals slipping in and out only a few inches away on the tv-screen! The nicest girls with figures one can only dream about and sexy like hell, they wear something around their belly. Why???? Is porn going back to middle age?

MASAMUNE
Senior Member

1452 Posts
12/04
Posted - Mar 20 2006 : 4:27PM
took me awhile to decipher what youre saying but have you watched any Zero Tolerance or Third Degree movies? you'll probably find those more to your liking

good luck

Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14594 Posts
3/02
Posted - Mar 20 2006 : 5:15PM
I actually like to see clothes in scenes on occasion. Of course, what we typically get is so limited as to offer little of a change of pace from the usual fare.

I do agree with you that shot selection often leaves something to be desired. I'll spare you my pet theory on why we get so many close-ups, though.

Loraine
Senior Member

1559 Posts
3/04
Posted - Mar 20 2006 : 5:58PM
Tease - show us your pet! Seriously, I'd like to hear your theory Hardware please. I've been thinking on the power and sometimes overuse of the closeup in porn for a while too.

edited because my typing sucks

Edited by - Loraine on 3/20/2006 5:59:42 PM

Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14594 Posts
3/02
Posted - Mar 20 2006 : 6:29PM
Well, OK. First of all, close-ups can be good. We all like to see the naughty bits and the action, right? So part of the reason they're there is because editors know that the shot works. However, whether by individual preference or just from application of the 'more is better' principle, it seems that some editors tend to overdo it.

Editorial preferences aside, I suspect that close ups also cover a multitude of sins. When the camera includes people's faces and more of the 'room' then it increases the possibility of problems with the shot. After all, you don't have to worry about a cock or a cunt being 'on,' but you might find your favorite actor is checking his watch if you could see the entire set through the lens. You might find that your favorite actress is glaring at the PA. You might see, as I recently did in a Vivid movie, people wandering around in the background, for no apparent reason.

Basically, I think that the number of people performing in front of and behind the camera in porn would be seriously reduced if not for the prevalence of the close-up. Of course, having said that, it amazes me the amount of crap that gets left in many movies, so what do I know?




Jump To: