more performer info on...

Bad News

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 568 > Bad News Bitches 2... wtf
AuthorPost
Juggo
Member

40 Posts
5/05
Posted - Jun 14 2006 : 10:10AM
As a fan of Cherry Poppens and Faith, I enjoyed the first edition of Bad News Bitches so I just checked out the sequel.

Unfortunately, it looks as if they just repackaged it and called it part two. A lot of the footage including most of the scenes (if not all) seem to be taken directly from the first one. Just going by memory of the first one, it looks to be damn near identical with just a "#2" slapped onto the opening title screen.

Is this standard practice? What a rip...

Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Jun 14 2006 : 11:29AM
Thanks for the warning. I will pay extra attention now when buying movies from Juicy Entertainment!
G_Jacobson
Member

Los Angeles
24 Posts
3/06
Posted - Jun 14 2006 : 1:45PM
Most likely they shot all the footage for 1 and 2 in the same week. This would explain why it would look "similar".
Juggo
Member

40 Posts
5/05
Posted - Jun 15 2006 : 12:05AM
^Nope, I'm saying the scenes are identical. Obviously if it just had a "similar look" I wouldn't have made this thread. It's been repackaged. Most of the scenes I recall are taken directly from the first. Actually read the post next time, you'll see I made that quite clear.

Edited by - Juggo on 6/15/2006 12:06:48 AM

Loraine
Senior Member

1559 Posts
3/04
Posted - Jun 15 2006 : 1:16AM
That's bad news...
 
Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14595 Posts
3/02
Posted - Jun 15 2006 : 2:06AM
Yeah, it's a bitch.
Loraine
Senior Member

1559 Posts
3/04
Posted - Jun 15 2006 : 3:24AM
It'd hard to resist, isn't it...really quite difficult.

Seriously though, if what the somewhat agitated Juggo says is correct, that does seem like a rip off.

I won't be buying Bad News Bitches 2.

Flash All-Star Supporter
Golden Age Classic

11018 Posts
5/01
Posted - Jun 15 2006 : 11:07AM
It looks from the back cover that you are right especially when one looks at the dates of production, 3/20/06, 8/11/05, 9/1/05, 8/19/05.



Jump To: