[Link]
| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Xioniet Member  263 Posts 1/10 |  Posted - Jun 22 2010 : 2:50AMI've just bought this on DVD and may I say it's one of the funniest and most accurate porn parodies I have ever seen. Everything about it is SPOT ON. The costumes, the voices, the mannerisms, the 1960s setting. I give this 12 out of 10. Absolute brilliant porn parody at its best. LOL. CLASSIC! * Oh, and the sex is top-notch too. [Link] |
| Xioniet Member 263 Posts 1/10 | Posted - Jun 23 2010 : 1:51AM [Link] |
maltedecker  All-Star Member 369 Posts 5/07 | Posted - Jun 23 2010 : 4:18AM edit: Oh, and thanks for the opinion and screens! Edited by - maltedecker on 6/23/2010 4:18:34 AM [Link] |
| Xioniet Member 263 Posts 1/10 | Posted - Jun 23 2010 : 6:11AM Ha! [Link] |
| Aplus Senior Member 1431 Posts 5/05 | Posted - Jun 23 2010 : 7:55PM [Link] |
| Xioniet Member 263 Posts 1/10 | Posted - Jun 24 2010 : 2:26AM [Link] |
| NewRomancer Deactivated User under THEIR avatar 738 Posts 7/08 | Posted - Jun 24 2010 : 12:07PM (Your mileage may vary) [Link] |
| Xioniet Member 263 Posts 1/10 | Posted - Jun 25 2010 : 5:27AM Obviously... [Link] |
| Gore Gore Girl Doctor of the Erotic Arts 7238 Posts 1/09 | Posted - Jun 25 2010 : 8:13PM [Link] |
| oneking Member 34 Posts 9/09 | Posted - Jul 9 2010 : 4:31PM For some reason, when the sex begins, it seems that everybody pretty much forgets about the character they're playing and the time period they're supposedly in. Suddenly the tattoos come out, and the usual cliche, "Oh yeah, fuck my fucking pussy" phrases start in. This TOTALLY takes me out of the moment, and suddenly we go from Batman to a Zero Tolerance gonzo flick. Now, if I'm in a gonzo mood, that's fine. But if I'm in the mood for a supposedly "retro" parody with people playing a character, then that's what it should be. This split personality approach to parodies is really starting to annoy my wife and I, and I'm sure there's others out there that feel like we do. To be fair, the first scene did a pretty good job of keeping the retro feel and consistency of character. Evan Stone did a good job of keeping his Riddler persona, and Kimberly Kane was sexy as hell, with her 60's hair, stockings, garters, and nicely groomed hairy coochie. Further, she never seemed to go into "porno slut" mode. For me, this was the standout scene. Robin and Batgirl were pretty good together, as well. But the Joker scene was downright annoying, mainly because of Andy San Dimas, with her ridiculous writhing around and never-ending torrent of typical porno-lingo. Yawn. Unfortunately, the same can be said of the final scene with Catwoman, played by Tori Black. The buidup was great, with her in Julie Newmar mode, but as soon as she removed her mask and clothes, she morphed into Tory Lane. No meows, no quips, no more Catwoman, period. Just typical raunchy porn sex. What a missed opportunity to give the Batman fans their Julie Newmar Catwoman fantasy. Oh well... So, to sum up, kudos to Vivid for putting some thought into the parody, and getting it so dead on, with the costumes and characterizations. Kudos to Axel Braun for choosing great angles and making great choices to help the sex sizzle most of the time. But major demerits to whomever is responsible for failing to keep the sex consistent with the characters and the retro vibe of this classic show! [Link] |
| Gore Gore Girl Doctor of the Erotic Arts 7238 Posts 1/09 | Posted - Jul 9 2010 : 5:29PM [Link] |
| oneking Member 34 Posts 9/09 | Posted - Jul 9 2010 : 6:26PM [Link] |
| Harry Buddha Palm Member 51 Posts 3/09 | Posted - Jul 10 2010 : 12:42AM I had the urge once to watch one of those Italian pornos about priests and nuns fucking because, well, I think blasphemy is really funny so I watched one and I thought the actors would be acting like they were doing something wrong and sinful but they just couldn't resist which would've been really hot. Instead, once the sex started, the nuns were sucking and fucking just like the porn stars that they were. Instead of a movie about Catholic priests and nuns falling to temptation, it was just a porno with porn stars dressed like priests and nuns (and nun habits aren't exactly sexy). It was really disappointing. I read an interview of a director a while back and he was talking about how he makes his actors stay in character during the sex scenes, which is something that always bothered him. I wish I could remember who it was. I completely agree with him and it something that bugs the shit out of me in plot based movies. You wouldn't think it would be that hard for the performers to stay in character during the sex scenes since most of them are putting on a performance during the sex anyway. [Link] |
| Gore Gore Girl Doctor of the Erotic Arts 7238 Posts 1/09 | Posted - Jul 10 2010 : 9:18AM [Link] |
| Harry Buddha Palm Member 51 Posts 3/09 | Posted - Jul 10 2010 : 11:09AM [Link] |
| oneking Member 34 Posts 9/09 | Posted - Jul 12 2010 : 4:01PM [Link] |
| Flash Golden Age Classic 11018 Posts 5/01 | Posted - Jul 13 2010 : 2:28PM [Link] |
| Gore Gore Girl Doctor of the Erotic Arts 7238 Posts 1/09 | Posted - Jul 13 2010 : 6:46PM But anyway, bottom line for me is that folks making films are not willing to take the risk, which is a shame. Integrated films like the Taboo series sell very well, so it's not like there isn't an audience out there. However, you couldn't exactly take individual scenes from Taboo and put them online (not that successfully anyway, especially not from films where the sex scene is fractured by narrative - think of the John Leslie scene in Sex World). Technology (and audience participation in that technology) is the culprit in that respect. Those are my thoughts in a nutshell. In terms of Hollywood v. Hardcore, there are a couple of interesting books on the subject. One is called...[ invalid url ]. I haven't read either of them, but they're in my bibliography. [Link] |
| oneking Member 34 Posts 9/09 | Posted - Jul 13 2010 : 11:47PM From browsing the forum, and reading reviews, and so forth, it seems that there are enough people who agree that sex is sexiest when it's smart, clever, and believable. When a twinkie is willing to have hardcore sex on film, it's basically par for the course. The exaggerated oohs and aahs are all "paint by the numbers", and there's nothing that really gets the blood pumping, though you can probably still get off, if they're strong enough eye candy. By contrast, the smarter and more sophisticated women who are given some good material to work with, produce some smoldering sex, even if they're not as attractive as the twinkie is. So, would I be wrong in assuming that a parody featuring a clever script in the hands of believable, truly sexy performers (in the tradtion of Veronica Hart, Marilyn Chambers and Kay Parker) would stand out head and shoulders above everything else in its genre and eclipse its competition, in terms of commercial success? Because if that is an accurate assumption, then that's what I think these features should aspire to. This is not a Herculean task, IMO. There are enough actresses in the industry who have a head on their shoulders, and can keep the acting believable, even during the sex. You've seen them and so have I. But of course you need a director who gives a damn to even make that part of the filmmaking process. Further, like in the case of Batman, if we're supposed to be in the 60's, then take 2 seconds to cover up the freakin' tattoos! Dig deep, spring for the extra makeup and get the job done! The upshot is that somebody has to have the balls to raise the bar, in terms of making a clever, consistent, sexy film, when it comes to these parodies. When they do, they'll stick out like a sore thumb, their profits will be huge, and others will feel the pressure to emulate them, in order to compete. Arguably, Vivid has gotten the furthest, in this regard, so far. But there's still a long way to go. [Link] |
| Aplus Senior Member 1431 Posts 5/05 | Posted - Jul 14 2010 : 8:49PM Edited by - aplus on 7/14/2010 8:51:33 PM [Link] |
| oneking Member 34 Posts 9/09 | Posted - Jul 14 2010 : 9:29PM But basically, I'm a believer that true quality stands out. When all the elements come together, and something original or at least something extraordinary comes as a result, everybody wants it, everybody is talking about it, and the bar is raised, even if just a tiny bit. The question is whether or not anybody in the industry cares. The overwhelming concensus, here on the forums is that nobody really does. I'm beginning to agree. [Link] |
| M.B. Senior Member 1679 Posts 2/01 | Posted - Jul 17 2010 : 10:13AM [Link] |
| oneking Member 34 Posts 9/09 | Posted - Jul 17 2010 : 12:05PM Kudos to Jeff Mullen for making a conscious effort to always keep his characters IN CHARACTER during the sex. So far, he's the only guy I'm aware of who makes this a priority, and I hope more folks do the same. [Link] |
| juha Senior Member 2752 Posts 3/05 | Posted - Jul 17 2010 : 5:49PM I said it in this thread Do feature directors underestimate their audience? and I say it again: The story has to support the sex and the sex has to support the story. I want the stars to stay in character during the sex. I want the sex and the story to be an entity. GGG and Flash already named most reasons for the disintegration. I might add that Vivid and Wicked put far more comps on the market than films. When a director shoots a scene for a film it has to work as comp fodder. I really wish that directors would strive to do better feature porn. But the internet kills the feature just like it kills the concept album. [Link] |
| Aplus Senior Member 1431 Posts 5/05 | Posted - Jul 28 2010 : 3:14PM [Link] |
| Robert Member My past is a foreign country. Most things are different there, including word usage. 503 Posts 12/06 | Posted - Jul 28 2010 : 3:49PM For me that seems like an impossibility in today's porn environment. So few good actresses and actors, so much silicon, tats and piercing. A good script is ruined before it is filmed. Then, to add insult to injury, the director and film editor put the final nails in the coffin with their close-ups, lousy camera angles and crazy lighting. End of OT rant. Turn the Bat Lantern back on.  [Link] |
| Aplus Senior Member 1431 Posts 5/05 | Posted - Jul 28 2010 : 4:11PM [Link] |
| Sith in SC Member Ceiling Cat is watching you masturbate. 371 Posts 8/03 | Posted - Aug 2 2010 : 12:58PM [Link] |
| Sith in SC Member Ceiling Cat is watching you masturbate. 371 Posts 8/03 | Posted - Aug 5 2010 : 12:29PM [Link] |
| fu_q All-Star Member Marv Montag (@PornOfYore) 2506 Posts 2/09 | Posted - Oct 3 2010 : 2:05PM ("Man of Steel", indeed, Batgirl!) [Link] |
| fu_q All-Star Member Marv Montag (@PornOfYore) 2506 Posts 2/09 | Posted - Oct 3 2010 : 2:07PM lol... [Link] |
| HansGeist Member 133 Posts 6/08 | Posted - Oct 3 2010 : 10:59PM [Link] |
| fu_q All-Star Member Marv Montag (@PornOfYore) 2506 Posts 2/09 | Posted - Oct 5 2010 : 4:59PM Don't know... [Link] |
| Gore Gore Girl Doctor of the Erotic Arts 7238 Posts 1/09 | Posted - Oct 5 2010 : 5:17PM [Link] |
| HansGeist Member 133 Posts 6/08 | Posted - Oct 5 2010 : 8:37PM BTW - looking at that page....I always loved that cover with Kelly Nichols and her tongue - oooch, she was hot! [Link] |
| Nameless1 Member 165 Posts 10/10 | Posted - Oct 21 2010 : 10:56PM [Link] |
| TheDreamPolice Deactivated User 170 Posts 2/10 | Posted - Oct 21 2010 : 11:17PM [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |