Featured New Release
Box cover for Teen Bush 10
Teen Bush 10
Studio: Team Skeet
Release date: 7/31/2026


all new releases
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 201 > Best and worst things in porn scenes
AuthorPost
Friendly neighbor
Member


Joy Kiss is the best (on photo)
20 Posts
6/15
Posted - Jun 12 2015 : 5:13AM
Hello all, I would like to share my opinion. Sorry, if you disagree, this is just my personal point of view. Important factors for porn scenes:
Worst sex position ever – reverse cow girl – you cannot see the woman’s nicely rounded butt. BUT - if it is POW and a man is lying and she is sitting on him and leaning forward so he can see her butthole and the cock penetrating her ass and open butt cheeks, and she is bending her waist - this POW will work well.
Without high heel shoes – not so good, most porn stars’ legs look short and not so attractive as they would look much better in heels. The shoes should not be too huge with big platforms or 10 inch heels. Should be elegant, 4-5 inch, light or satin, better with a belt around the ankle. High heel sandals (peep toe shoes) are also great.
Not good - Without make-up or absence of accessories, absence of sexy outfits. Girls look much better in glamour make up, shade on eye leads, lash mascara, large ear-rings, stockings, etc.
Sucking many dicks at the same time. Two much fuzzbuzz without sexy view. Two dicks in the mouth at the same time – disaster. The idea of a blow job is when a pretty girl rings her bright lips against his dick and sucks with lust. And those blow bang scenes are just waste of time. The idea of blow bang is good, but it would be much better if she sucks cocks one after another.
The best view for a blow job is side view of the camera! At the same height as the girl’s head. Not too high – you can see her eyes but you cannot see the whole mouth ring, and not too low – you cannot see her eyes! When a girl is lying on her back with her head hanging down off the bed , i.e. turned upside down and he fucks her mouth – not good – because if the girl is pretty – you cannot appreciate how pretty her face is because the face is upside down. And do not mess up her face too much! Her face will not look attractive!
Wearing masks on pretty girls. What for? If the girl is pretty I better see her face!
Imitation of rape. Total waste of time. There is too much fuzzbuzz again and lack of real actions, the dicks fall off ass or pussy, they turned her around, pushing all the time, twisting her arms, instead of simply fucking her in a rough way. Waste of time!
When a scene and action is too slow and gentle. The humping should be rough enough and passionate.
Double anal – in most cases – waste of time. The directors do not understand that the idea of the scene is not a world record or some achievement, the idea is to look sexy. Thus, it is much better to have a huge dick going through the tight asshole ring – you can see the asshole’s ring in this case; but when it’s two dicks – they are just somewhere – in some niche, and with double anal the tempo is lost. You have a feeling that the actors are just trying to do some work with zero passion, and just pure schematic.
Now about double penetration. Please, dear directors, if you are doing reverse cow girl dp – the only way to make it look attractive is when an man who is on top – he places his one leg over her thigh, stepping over her thigh with his leg, like crisscross. Very often the reverse cowgirl dp is not attractive because – again – you cannot see her ass, her nicely rounded butt.
And please – have more cowgirl girl dp scenes (do not confuse with reverse cowgirl). And, in cowgirl dp scene it looks much better when it is not a side view because you cannot actually see the holes, but when the man on top steps with his one leg and puts his foot forward in this case he opens the view and you can see the penetrated holes clearly. And in this position – with his foot forward – he is able to hump harder.
Please never perform this position – he is screwing her butt, in doggy position, then he steps higher, on top of her, you can see the whole penetration clearly, and then someone else comes from behind and puts his dick in her pussy, so it’s a recently invented DP , never seen it in older movies. But it’s no good – because the tempo of the scene is lost completely!!! The two men totally are not letting each other fuck her comfortably.
Standing DP is good, but again, a little awkward, men get tired if they are holding her completely in the air, it would be better if she would be standing on one leg or as a good alternative – DP in spooning position. The hottest DPs I saw was half-spooning half-reverse cowgirl with Hannah Harper and Tony T and some guy when she was lying half on her back and half on her side and the guys were DPing her on the couch! Again , the guy on top put his leg over her thigh for better pushing and better view.
And now – best anal positions:
When she is lying on her belly, BUT her legs are not put together but spread apart and bent in the knees and a camera is shooting from behind, and she can be either on a pillow, or on a couch handle, lounge. See an example Sabrinka in gangbang – she is on couch arm assfucked – hottest anal scene ever.
When she is sitting on a bar chair. And when he is screwing her butt from behind, he better stand on one leg and put his second foot over her thigh and place it on that chair for better pushing.
Doggy style, standing and on her knees, but please – when she is on her knees and her asshole is too high for his dick – please have her move her ass towards him and down – it would be rather a froggy position – very convenient for ass fuck.
When doggy on the floor – put pillow under her knees. Or if she gives a blowjob when standling on her knees.
When doggy – he should grab her tits, when cowgirl – should grab her butt cheeks.
JigglyBoobs
Senior Member

1614 Posts
3/12
Posted - Jun 12 2015 : 2:49PM
I see every studio and director running to change their styles of filming tomorrow...
StarGrek
Deactivated User

Under the moonlight.
1763 Posts
10/11
Posted - Jun 12 2015 : 6:47PM
I will give a simple answer to what I like and dislike in porn, as I wrote dozen times in other threads.

I like all positions in almost every action, as long it is safe inside the limits of eroticism, they are executed properly, meaning the performers place their body parts in such a way where the penetration(s) are controlled and can be committed with ease and intensity, without causing the girl discomfort and agony, assisting at the same time many parallel sensual activities which raise the chemistry between the performers and the overall interest of the scene. All this under the appropriate capturing angles which allow both a clear generous visual confirmation of the penetrations, showing the stretched rings of every orifice, as well as most of the female's bodily assets is possible to fit in (ass, tits, legs, face, abs etc..), without though breaking the energy and the heat of the scene.
StarGrek
Deactivated User

Under the moonlight.
1763 Posts
10/11
Posted - Jun 12 2015 : 7:30PM
I dislike every directing mentality who is stuck in obsessive patterns which are totally inefficient and malicious for the proper engineering and photography of every position and action. Every Sloppy Mentality that repeatedly blocks the pursuit of pornographic perfection and becomes serious obstacle for the absolute visual satisfaction. In other words I dislike when directors keep applying stupid setups and wrong angles without even bothering to search for better solutions and combinations.
StarGrek
Deactivated User

Under the moonlight.
1763 Posts
10/11
Posted - Jun 14 2015 : 4:56AM
Now I will try to point out a few things in your post friendly neighbor, for the sake of discussion. Of course as you mentioned, we all have our own specific preferences and tastes, so in some proposals I very much agree on you in some I do not. Yet, generally I believe that we have to think a bit of other perspectives too, examining in a more spherical way the facts, before we become absolute on what we say.
With all due respect my friend I COMPLETELY disagree. From what I get, you are a booty and anal enthusiast. I too love very much the fruity shape of a woman's ass and therefore I also like to admire it shaking in doggy and cowgirl positions. But a woman's sexual identity is not limited only in her butt hole. Her entire body is an erotic garden full of fruits and flavors. There are women with ample, natural beautiful shaped breasts, with sensitive perky nipples, with pretty mesmerizing eyes and fleshy lips, with inviting pink pussies, well fit abs, firm meaty thighs, long sleek legs. There are so many details on a woman's body which although for some might seem indifferent and minor, for others can be quite stimulating, like the hair of her pubic area, the lips of her pussy, her nails, her feet, her areolas... And there is no better position to expose many or even all of these assets than reverse cowgirl. Although we do not apply this position often in our private life, its pornographic value is IMMENSE.
One more advantage this position has, is its plasticity. Depending on the way you position the girl's body parts as well as the camera, you can emphasize in different areas of the starlets body. And since you talk about ass there are a number of ways to expose nicely a woman's ass in this pose. One of them you mentioned yourself. One other is when the man lifts her waist up a bit from beneath and she keeps her legs up and attached to each other. The position provides a mirror reflection of a doggy position providing even more clear view of the penetration. One other way would be the front squatting pose, where she holds her ass cheeks apart and bounces her butt up and down on a hard pole impaling herself at free will while the camera angle is low and proportional. And there are even more ways like twisted side versions where a generous part of the ass is exposed as she leans slightly on the side. Keeping it short, it is all about photo-mechanics. If you can harness the photo-mechanics well you can create porn magic in every position.
I like both with or without heels. I find both attractive for different reasons. I love the high heels in a woman's clothing outfit but I also like her toes, the palm of their feet or activities like feet licking.
I totally agree. Really now, there are many models with barbie faces whose attractiveness changes drastically without make up.
I would say that I agree, although there are some cases where the girl's hunger for penile taste is emphasized when she literally attacks the dicks trying to fit or lick as many as she can inside her.
Hmmm... Probably I agree, but I also like that POV shot taken from the male head height angle. It is kind of hot to have straight eye-contact with the girl the exact time he is putting her lips around a big cock.
That is beyond stupidity to put a mask on a pretty girl's face. I extend this sentence to any part of her body which is attractive like when the girl has beautiful breasts and they are covered by bra or t-shirt. That is idiotic.
1000% agree and I raise even more. I like to see hard intensive sex but I totally disapprove of misogynistic, violent behavior and generally any action that uglifies the girl's looks (hooking, face slapping, spitting etc..) and neutralizes her sexual personality.
I agree. Although I would like to be a gradual raise in the tempo. The guys have to start slow and careful in order to let enough time to let the internal walls of the girls holes to adjust on their dick sizes. This is essential for the sexual sanitary of women and use enough lube to make the penetration easier. But then they can gradually increase the pace until they move in frantic pace. By my personal real life experience the only women who like it slow are the virgins and the ones who are intimidated by the size of your cock (If you have more than a 9 inch dick) or if the penetrating angle and the dick shape is causing her discomfort. All the rest ones like it hard, fast and intimate.
 
StarGrek
Deactivated User

Under the moonlight.
1763 Posts
10/11
Posted - Jun 14 2015 : 8:50AM
Now about DPs
Concerning, DAP, I agree totally especially about the anal ring explanation you gave. However, I have to add that there were a few times that this controversial act was executed and captured very well, offering all this extreme dirtiness some people seek. But generally, for all the reasons you stated above and for a few more too, DAP is not the action I seek more in a DP scene.
First, I totally disagree when you are absolutely stating "the only" way. Reverse cowgirl greatest advantage is the plain unlimited view, not only of the entire girl's body but also of the double penetration itself . So, girls who are gifted with beautiful front figures and faces are exposed brilliantly by this position and it would be a dreadful pornographic crime to bury their wonderful attires between two hairy male butts for the entire duration of the DP. Furthermore, this position has the largest number of committed versions, depending on how you place the body parts of the performers. By knowing the engineering of each version you can multiply the efficiency and the visuals of the double penetrations, making them smooth, deep, hard and of course immensely photographic. Plus by exploiting the photo-mechanics well you can show all or emphasize on a certain part of a woman's body, including her round butt. It is just a matter of brilliance. Now, back in the first half of 2000's this pose in both sides of the Atlantic was very popular, not because of the quantity, but mostly because of the technical quality and the diversity of the applied versions. A few years after, the same position was so fucked up, in every damn aspect (intensity, hardcorness, photography, eroticism, diversity, penetration, applied time...etc etc) that for a period of time the vast majority of the committed versions were ... let's say far far away from their real pornographic potential. Even acclaimed directors with big experience made fundamental mistakes in setup and coverage of the certain position, destroying completely its visual appeal. Now, I see some light in the end of the tunnel, but there is still much to discover.
On the other hand, I totally agree that the version you mentioned is highly pornographic and by any means completely underrated, at least from the American directors (for some reason, I cannot explain, it was gradually vanished from the modern American DP repertoire). Frankly, IMHO this is one of the most powerful DP positions. I call it French edition because it is was mostly applied by French directors. Pierre Woodman and his apprentice David Perry are some of the directors they still apply it btw. It has its own secrets and it can easily approved inefficient if is not committed correctly. Yet, if it is does, it can offer great level of ergonomic efficiency (meaning both guys can exercise hard, very deep and intensive strokes), it can offer a rather wide visual margin to the girl's neither area showing both of her overstretched holes pretty clear, the way the top guy passes his leg over hers actually locks him somehow in place and provides better and safer penetration angles, the way all the performers bodies are bond together creates a beautiful photographic complex, there are a number of potential erotic activities which can be assisted like when she grabs the guys on top behind pushing him towards her or holding his shoulder or passing her leg around his waist, the fact that the guy on top leans close towards her creates an interesting contradiction, from one hand it elevates intimacy and passion giving him the chance to proceed to mouth or neck kisses and from the other it gives an extra hardcore sense, as the guys dominate caging her in place. Finally, something most people and directors don't know is that all these elements create a combination which is very pleasurable for the woman. In fact, if the position is right, the girl can afford their dick sizes and there is a decent burst of double hammering, it is possible for her to have a mind blowing orgasm in the first 15 seconds. Trust me, I am not exaggerating, I know exactly what I am saying! Finally, some could say, that the male bodies might obscure the visual access to the starlets body, true, but if you do a few smart adjustments, you might combine the advantages of this pose without losing any of the full body magic.

I also agree 100% that in order the DP in this position to be even more attractive in any version that is applied, besides the proportional capture of most of the girl's body, the director MUST manage to fit in the frame, a clear view of her butt and the anal penetration too. But in order to do this, the camera should be in the proper position, twisted in the perfect angle and the positioning should be flawless. There are also moments, where the scene or the girl screams for more hard treatment. In this case, the director must sacrifice a bit the visuals in order to enhance the energy, the double stuffing sensation and the pleasure of the girl. This is happening very often in cowgirl position but very rarely in the reverse way.
With all due respect neighbor, I don't know what you are watching, but the cowgirl is clearly the most dominant DP position than any other one, everywhere in the adult world, including the amateur section. I don't think someone can have any complain about the quantity, the frequency and the devoted time of this specific DP pose. The overwhelming majority of the DP scenes worldwide contains at least one adequate timed cowgirl DP session. Most of the scenes contain even more in many different combinations and views. There is no doubt, cowgirl, if it is done correctly exposes nicely the woman's delightful derriere and not only. Is the most efficient and easily applicable DP position of all and there are about 20 good reasons for this. Yet, there are many other sizzling hot DP positions who have their own unique visual appeal and deserve their time in the scene too. In any case, I think the DP position list in a scene should be enriched and not limited in one single position, whichever this is. This way, the scene will collect fans from different DP styles and will not end up monotonous and boring.
Now, the issue in this position and in every other position is not the quantity but the quality. Yes, you are absolutely right, there are many times where the coverage in a cowgirl DP needs a slight correction, especially when the girl has a big ass which blocks the visual access and creates shadows. Some other times the directors decide to sacrifice the visuals in favor of effective motion and energy or even emphasize on the beauty and eroticism of the body placement, when for example the girl arks back exposing her breast and the guy behind her cups her rack or kiss her on the neck (I love this when it happens). With a few minor amendments in photo-mechanics the directors can fix the visual issue, preserving the pace and beauty of the extreme act. The procedure you mention is indeed the best in terms of efficiency and is impressive you comprehend it, although there are a few more details they have to be taken care off too.
Well, being honest, it is not my favorite position yet is not my worst either. If you are not homophobic, some well applied photo-mechanics can make miracles, presenting a hot, hard and nasty doggy DP session. Jules and LegalPorno are specialized in this position. I can tell you it is very efficient in big dick sizes.
Standing DP is one of the hottest DP positions which have ever been applied in porn. Yet you are right, the version in which the girl is held up in the air is very physically demanding for the guys but if the weight is shared equally and the girl assist too, managing to hold tight from both men shoulders it is affordable, at least for a couple of minutes. That standing in one leg version is even better in terms of visual access, physical efficiency and beauty. The way the girl lifts her leg up is elegant. There are even cases in which the girl's leg is lifted high and placed upon the guys shoulder. This version is actually more right to be called standing. Finally there are semi-standing versions where one of the guys (front or back) is supporting himself on a couch or another surface. Now, about that spooning position you mention, else known as scissors is true it is a very hot DP position and yes it should be used more.
Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07
Posted - Jun 15 2015 : 11:57AM
I'd say that one of the worst things in porn is how porn deals with female orgasm.
Most porn movies don't show any female orgasm at all. And even when they show it, then they often show it in a false and misleading way. Such as when a woman orgasms from vaginal or anal intercourse alone, without much clitoral stimulation.
According to some studies, only 3% of women say that their most reliable route to orgasm is through intercourse alone. Although about 25% of women say that occasionally they might have an orgasm from intercourse alone without clitoral stimulation, but not reliably so.
About 75% of women say that the only way they can reach orgasm is through clitoral stimulation. And an additional 20 - 25% of women say that clitoral stimulation is the best way for them to reach orgasm. But you wouldn't think this, if you watch heterosexual porn movies. It's like porn is faking and lying to its viewers, rather than showing it the way it really is.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/
The only realistic thing about female orgasm in porn is the lack of it in most porn movies. But this is a sad reality that doesn't have to be this way. There is no good reason why guys have to stay away from the clitoris of their lady and not even try to make her orgasm during their sexual intercourse.

Edited by - Dan on 6/15/2015 11:58:07 AM

Friendly neighbor
Member

Joy Kiss is the best (on photo)
20 Posts
6/15
Posted - Jun 16 2015 : 4:03AM
I have noticed sometimes drunk girls have orgasms, like in gloryholeswallow - it's some amateur girl Taylor and Savannah, also Madison Parker really enjoys anal in my opinion.
Friendly neighbor
Member

Joy Kiss is the best (on photo)
20 Posts
6/15
Posted - Jun 16 2015 : 6:28AM
Yes! Have a look at these two pictures. The first one - scissors is much more attractive for me than the second one. This what I am talking about:
[Image not found DB]
[Image not found DB]
StarGrek
Deactivated User

Under the moonlight.
1763 Posts
10/11
Posted - Jun 16 2015 : 10:22AM
Neighbor I can't see a damn thing ... I guess you violated the picture posing rights and the mods removed your pics.
One way to publish a pic with hardcore sexual content here, is to use the http link of the pic ONLY.
Friendly neighbor
Member

Joy Kiss is the best (on photo)
20 Posts
6/15
Posted - Jun 16 2015 : 3:10PM
Oh, okay, thank you)
Dragon Sign
Deactivated User

3381 Posts
12/13
Posted - Jun 17 2015 : 7:53PM
These matters that just can't be clearly defined. And they won't work together.
pinkyfan
Member

217 Posts
8/12
Posted - Jun 17 2015 : 8:25PM
Best thing: simultaneous pussy fucking and clit licking by a female or girlreceiving pussy licking by another female while alsogetting fucked up her ass by a guy
Worst thing: faecal discharge during anal
Pornomania
Deactivated User

Grab it by the Base........
252 Posts
10/14
Posted - Jun 20 2015 : 7:43PM
One of the worst things for me is the fact that there are a lot of pornstars that dont give good blowjobs. Blowjobs are done best when the lady wraps her lips tightly around a big long cock and you can see her cheeks suctioned in while she sucks it.
Friendly neighbor
Member

Joy Kiss is the best (on photo)
20 Posts
6/15
Posted - Jun 22 2015 : 7:48AM
Yes, that's what I'm talking about, it should be a mouth ring of lips with bright lipstick.



Jump To: