Especially when it comes to scenes with girls with bigger butts, many male talents look like pencils. I find that visually very unsatisfying.
Edited by - InstantClassic on 3/18/2024 12:22:06 PM
Introducing Kalani Luana| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Pete Zaface Senior Member 3064 Posts 8/03 | Heresy, I know. The thought came to me as I was perusing some videos in my collection and first noticed Elena Koshka taking a Goldilocks cock (not too big, not too small, but just right) effortlessly almost to the hilt repeatedly. What I noticed was how efortlessly she did it, and I could easily imagine how smooth it must have felt to the beneficiary of her attentions. Then I saw a more standard video -- doesn't matter which one, because most in this regard are the same -- wherein the guy was so long and so wide that the girl couldn't get more than three or four inches in. I could imagine teeth getting in the way, I could see no rhythm developing, and I couldn't imagine how the guy was getting much pleasure out of it. I know that for me, it was far less visually appealing. That's not to say that some girls can't handle big dicks or make it look easy. I just saw Kacey Warner in a Blacked scene doing a really smooth job on her partner. She focused on what she was able to do comfortably, and, because of that, she made the four or five inches she was able to take seem effortless, much as in the first scene. But by and large, the second situation I've described is, I think, more typical than the first. I'm well aware of a semi-misogynistic theme in a lot of porn -- she can't handle it, she gets destroyed by a big dick (or multiple dicks), etc. I guess some people get off on that aspect of it. But I'm less impressed by the size of the wand than by the magic a girl is able to perform with it. [Link] |
| InstantClassic Senior Member What Have You Done To My Little Cable Boy? 2966 Posts 5/10 | Especially when it comes to scenes with girls with bigger butts, many male talents look like pencils. I find that visually very unsatisfying. Edited by - InstantClassic on 3/18/2024 12:22:06 PM |
| rearadmiral All-Star Member 6510 Posts 12/11 | |
| fit18 Member 642 Posts 1/20 | Multiple employees from condom companies have repeatedly told me the sale of magnum/xl size condoms is grossly disproportionate to the actual population, regardless of ethnicity. As a side note: if you want to date a porn girl, they don't mind if you are average. They prefer it if you can imagine how uncomfortable it is being stretched out all day for work. |
| cara Member 143 Posts 5/23 | |
| RickFBerger3 Member You do you. 201 Posts 11/23 | If the male performer is particularly well endowed, then if the girl picks up on that, the guy has more than the usual opportunity to make the sex scintillating. Or, his dick could end up being a colossal paperweight, and the girl would do better with the average dildo. Size ends up being proportional with potential. But if the dick is average, or more like our own (let's admit this, fellas), then it's up to the male performer to rely on other talents to make the scene work. And when he does, then it's like size didn't matter at all. InstantClassic made an interesting point: When the woman has a big butt, a smaller dick can end up looking like a pencil. Let's put this theory to the test.
Here is one of my go-to scenes since it was filmed five years ago, directed by Laurent Sky for Tushy.com. It features the gob-smacking Ashley Red, who possesses an ass whose size and breadth can knock you into perpetual delirium. Who needs chemicals when you've got this girl? Anyway, the guy is Mick Blue. His dick isn't huge, though it's probably above-average length for most male performers. Does her ass dwarf his manhood? Yea, it kinda does. But let me tell you, Ashley can happily dwarf my manhood any time, anywhere. But the case is about the guy: Does his length and girth make the scene unwatchable? I would argue no. This woman is mesmerizingly beautiful, and if she filmed a scene with a more average guy, she'd still find a way to attain nirvana. She didn't always, though - some of her early scenes, you kinda wonder whether she didn't show up and sent a mannequin in her place. Not this scene. When the girl gains talent as a performer (Ashley gained it along the way), and the guy brings talent to the table (or rather the bed), they can find a way to make the scene work. When it doesn't work, then we can start talking about sizes and measurements. RFB3 |
| InstantClassic Senior Member What Have You Done To My Little Cable Boy? 2966 Posts 5/10 | The problem I have with chemistry and emotion in porn - is that I can't evaluate it. I don't know what's real, what's fake. These people are actors to a certain extent. I don't know if the girl is enjoying it or just faking it. But what I can say for myself - whether it is visually sexy for me, whether it has a WOW effect for me. And that's how I can evaluate a scene for myself.
|
| cara Member 143 Posts 5/23 | |
| Tony Spumoni Member 110 Posts 12/23 | |
| RickFBerger3 Member You do you. 201 Posts 11/23 | Judging from just those two photo shoots, there's nothing I see that would disqualify me watching either scene. I can see you're turned on by proportions: bigger dick, smaller anus. Would it help if the girl had a more compact ass - not such a "big booty?" In other words, does the dick have to be huge, or just proportionately larger than the girl's aperture? Meanwhile, I'm turned on by the girl in #2, maybe precisely for the reasons you're turned off: She's got a wonderful, round ass that, at least from this angle, seems to want to flow and escape from the whole frame. I don't know what's supposed to be so terrible about cellulite. I love scenes where the girl's ass ripples when it's smacked, and her bounce is echoed by her tits. And the fact that she dwarfs the guy's dick? For me, that's a turn-on. Maybe I'm just now realizing, I like it when the girl is overwhelming, when what she brings to the bed is so powerful that the guy can't play the domineer. Which puts me and Pete Zaface in much the same boat. Some folks get off on seeing the girl "destroyed," which I think gives the viewer a sense of power. Now, I love seeing the girl exhausted, sweaty, a bit spent. I want to see effort put into the sex; if I want to see mannequins posing, I'll open a Playboy centerfold from the '60s. The misogyny part actually turns me off. Aggression is fine, but I love it when the girl responds with aggression too. There's other things that play into Picture #2 as well: her smile, the play of her eyes with the camera, her floppy labia. I love when a girl's labia forms these little bells. One of the real revolutions in porn history, when gonzo from directors like Dark Bros. broke through the industry, wasn't just about getting rid of the damn plot and letting us watch the sex, for crissake. It was getting over the rule that girl performers can't break the fourth wall and look into the camera. Great show dancers know they multiply their sensuality by looking straight into the guys' eyes. With gonzo, female performers could finally bring their eyes into the scene. I'm drawn to Picture #2 because she's looking at me. I'm one of these weirdos who actually wants the girl to look at the camera. (EDIT: I somehow forgot #1 is looking into the camera too. Maybe it's the message her eyes are sending. #1 is saying, "WOW, this guy's too big!" #2 is saying, "I actually want YOU, not this dude.") So there are little things that make a huge difference in whether a scene gets our dicks up. Pete picks up on the girl's discomfort. When her cervix is just too small to handle a colossal cock, but the guy doesn't have a plan for that, it ruins the scene. For rearadmiral, he's tuned into the girl(s) enjoying herself, and I'm very much in that camp. That's why her eyes make such an impact for me. If the guy's dick is huge, and she's a bit overwhelmed by that but she really goes for it, and it shows in her sex and in her eyes, that's a huge turn-on for me. If that's what the girl in Picture #1 projects, I'm likely to like that scene too. RFB3 Edited by - RickFBerger3 on 3/21/2024 9:25:14 AM |
| Graciefan Member 525 Posts 6/11 | |
| Blueazure Member 71 Posts 11/23 | |
| InstantClassic Senior Member What Have You Done To My Little Cable Boy? 2966 Posts 5/10 | The thing is, I don't really believe in porn sex. I think there are way too many interruptions and breaks in porn for me to believe that the girls are really into it. It's more work than sex in my opinion. So since I don't believe in porn sex and that camera friendly positions with short, thin cocks are the slightest bit exciting for the girls, I tend to rely more on the visual appeal. And of course I'm aware that girls don't have the best sex of their lives with Chris Diamond because of his size. But because of his size, it's easier for me to at least imagine it..... that's roughly how fantasy and porn work for me Edited by - InstantClassic on 3/21/2024 10:56:04 AM |
| Whyspers2Scorpio Senior Member "Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite 2342 Posts 12/17 | |
| RickFBerger3 Member You do you. 201 Posts 11/23 | I do have to admit, there are a great many scenes where the couple is really getting coupled, and the dick is doing exactly what I need to do for me to get invested in the scene, and I forget who the guy is and I don't have to pay attention to him for awhile. Then when it's done and he pulls out, I can see who he was, and I notice, hey, that's Mick Blue. In that sense, I think Mick is a good performer, like a great ballroom dancer. He's there to make the girl look great, and he does his job. |
| veridical Member 176 Posts 3/24 | "Alura Jenson and Piper Perri share BBC"/"Watching My Mom Go Black": NannySpy scene "Nanny Pervs Out On Boss' Big Black Dick": I don't know what the real name of this scene is, but obviously the video tag says "TestMyAss," but I wasn't able to find it on IAFD: Amazing scenes, imo. |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |