New Pornstar Interviews - [more]
Introducing Kalani Luana

"I’m also a really big pleaser and I love giving blowjobs."
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 39 > Big dicks are overrated
AuthorPost
Pete Zaface
Senior Member


3064 Posts
8/03
Posted - Mar 18 2024 : 11:50AM
Heresy, I know.

The thought came to me as I was perusing some videos in my collection and first noticed Elena Koshka taking a Goldilocks cock (not too big, not too small, but just right) effortlessly almost to the hilt repeatedly. What I noticed was how efortlessly she did it, and I could easily imagine how smooth it must have felt to the beneficiary of her attentions.

Then I saw a more standard video -- doesn't matter which one, because most in this regard are the same -- wherein the guy was so long and so wide that the girl couldn't get more than three or four inches in. I could imagine teeth getting in the way, I could see no rhythm developing, and I couldn't imagine how the guy was getting much pleasure out of it. I know that for me, it was far less visually appealing.

That's not to say that some girls can't handle big dicks or make it look easy. I just saw Kacey Warner in a Blacked scene doing a really smooth job on her partner. She focused on what she was able to do comfortably, and, because of that, she made the four or five inches she was able to take seem effortless, much as in the first scene. But by and large, the second situation I've described is, I think, more typical than the first.

I'm well aware of a semi-misogynistic theme in a lot of porn -- she can't handle it, she gets destroyed by a big dick (or multiple dicks), etc. I guess some people get off on that aspect of it.

But I'm less impressed by the size of the wand than by the magic a girl is able to perform with it.

InstantClassic
Senior Member

What Have You Done To My Little Cable Boy?
2966 Posts
5/10
Posted - Mar 18 2024 : 12:21PM
I am a visual porn fan and I find it much more exciting when the girls have sex with a bigger dick. I think about 80% of the current male talent ( it's not that many because you see the same guys everywhere) is too short and way, way too thin for the camera.

Especially when it comes to scenes with girls with bigger butts, many male talents look like pencils. I find that visually very unsatisfying.

Edited by - InstantClassic on 3/18/2024 12:22:06 PM

rearadmiral All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

6510 Posts
12/11
Posted - Mar 18 2024 : 12:59PM
I agree. It's like having the model struggle with a large penis is fetishized by a lot of people. I like seeing the model enjoy herself. Sure, some scenes work well with some struggling, but there's nothing wrong with seeing the model have fun and enjoy herself too.
fit18
Member

642 Posts
1/20
Posted - Mar 18 2024 : 3:50PM
all the replies are correct. Porn is fantasy, so the big penis is aspirational.
Multiple employees from condom companies have repeatedly told me the sale of magnum/xl size condoms is grossly disproportionate to the actual population, regardless of ethnicity.

As a side note: if you want to date a porn girl, they don't mind if you are average. They prefer it if you can imagine how uncomfortable it is being stretched out all day for work.
(footrubs and head massages will also score you points)

cara
Member

143 Posts
5/23
Posted - Mar 18 2024 : 3:56PM
I like when they can take it balls deep. I don't think small dicks are a good look in porn but 7" is fine. Now some girls on blacked really surprised me. Like Xxlayna or Kylie. They can take the biggest dick balls deep, and continuously.
 
RickFBerger3
Member

You do you.
201 Posts
11/23
Posted - Mar 20 2024 : 3:03PM
On the surface, I agree. But then there's the case of what the man possessing the wand is capable of enabling the girl to do with said wand.

If the male performer is particularly well endowed, then if the girl picks up on that, the guy has more than the usual opportunity to make the sex scintillating. Or, his dick could end up being a colossal paperweight, and the girl would do better with the average dildo. Size ends up being proportional with potential.

But if the dick is average, or more like our own (let's admit this, fellas), then it's up to the male performer to rely on other talents to make the scene work. And when he does, then it's like size didn't matter at all.

InstantClassic made an interesting point: When the woman has a big butt, a smaller dick can end up looking like a pencil. Let's put this theory to the test.

Ashley Red 01.png
Ashley Red 02.png

Here is one of my go-to scenes since it was filmed five years ago, directed by Laurent Sky for Tushy.com. It features the gob-smacking Ashley Red, who possesses an ass whose size and breadth can knock you into perpetual delirium. Who needs chemicals when you've got this girl? Anyway, the guy is Mick Blue. His dick isn't huge, though it's probably above-average length for most male performers. Does her ass dwarf his manhood? Yea, it kinda does. But let me tell you, Ashley can happily dwarf my manhood any time, anywhere.

But the case is about the guy: Does his length and girth make the scene unwatchable? I would argue no. This woman is mesmerizingly beautiful, and if she filmed a scene with a more average guy, she'd still find a way to attain nirvana. She didn't always, though - some of her early scenes, you kinda wonder whether she didn't show up and sent a mannequin in her place. Not this scene. When the girl gains talent as a performer (Ashley gained it along the way), and the guy brings talent to the table (or rather the bed), they can find a way to make the scene work.

When it doesn't work, then we can start talking about sizes and measurements.

RFB3

InstantClassic
Senior Member

What Have You Done To My Little Cable Boy?
2966 Posts
5/10
Posted - Mar 20 2024 : 6:16PM
@RickFBerger3

The problem I have with chemistry and emotion in porn - is that I can't evaluate it. I don't know what's real, what's fake. These people are actors to a certain extent. I don't know if the girl is enjoying it or just faking it.

But what I can say for myself - whether it is visually sexy for me, whether it has a WOW effect for me. And that's how I can evaluate a scene for myself.


Pic 1 has a WOW effect for me. It looks impressive to me.

1.jpg


Picture 2 has no effect on me at all. I could never watch this scene no matter how sexy I would find the girl. For someone like me, who comes more from the visual aspect than from what the people on screen are pretending to be, this scene would be far too unimpressive and therefore far too boring.

2.jpg


So for me, what I see is much more important than what I imagine. In this sense, the size of the male performer plays just as big a role as the attractiveness of the girl (to me). Only one aspect of both doesn't work for me....which makes porn in 2024 incredibly difficult for me.

cara
Member

143 Posts
5/23
Posted - Mar 20 2024 : 7:20PM
In the 70s and 80s porn sized dick didn't exist or was less of a thing. When I look at those old movies which are now in 1080p I really don't mind the average sized dicks.

It's more of a gonzo porn fan thing

Edited by - cara on 3/20/2024 7:20:47 PM

Tony Spumoni
Member

110 Posts
12/23
Posted - Mar 21 2024 : 12:45AM
I'm always just interested in understanding the physics of how it works. My wife is slighter taller than average for a female and she can barely take all of my average sized dick without it hitting her cervix and causing pain, meanwhile I see these 4'11" 95 lb girls take Danny D balls deep. I guess every woman is built differently.
RickFBerger3
Member

You do you.
201 Posts
11/23
Posted - Mar 21 2024 : 9:19AM
How interesting. Porn is supposed to play into our psychologies, reaching deeply into the center of our libido. Sex is, in many ways, about the mind - and all our minds are different, just as all our bodies are different.

Judging from just those two photo shoots, there's nothing I see that would disqualify me watching either scene. I can see you're turned on by proportions: bigger dick, smaller anus. Would it help if the girl had a more compact ass - not such a "big booty?" In other words, does the dick have to be huge, or just proportionately larger than the girl's aperture?

Meanwhile, I'm turned on by the girl in #2, maybe precisely for the reasons you're turned off: She's got a wonderful, round ass that, at least from this angle, seems to want to flow and escape from the whole frame. I don't know what's supposed to be so terrible about cellulite. I love scenes where the girl's ass ripples when it's smacked, and her bounce is echoed by her tits. And the fact that she dwarfs the guy's dick? For me, that's a turn-on. Maybe I'm just now realizing, I like it when the girl is overwhelming, when what she brings to the bed is so powerful that the guy can't play the domineer.

Which puts me and Pete Zaface in much the same boat. Some folks get off on seeing the girl "destroyed," which I think gives the viewer a sense of power. Now, I love seeing the girl exhausted, sweaty, a bit spent. I want to see effort put into the sex; if I want to see mannequins posing, I'll open a Playboy centerfold from the '60s. The misogyny part actually turns me off. Aggression is fine, but I love it when the girl responds with aggression too.

There's other things that play into Picture #2 as well: her smile, the play of her eyes with the camera, her floppy labia. I love when a girl's labia forms these little bells. One of the real revolutions in porn history, when gonzo from directors like Dark Bros. broke through the industry, wasn't just about getting rid of the damn plot and letting us watch the sex, for crissake. It was getting over the rule that girl performers can't break the fourth wall and look into the camera. Great show dancers know they multiply their sensuality by looking straight into the guys' eyes. With gonzo, female performers could finally bring their eyes into the scene. I'm drawn to Picture #2 because she's looking at me. I'm one of these weirdos who actually wants the girl to look at the camera. (EDIT: I somehow forgot #1 is looking into the camera too. Maybe it's the message her eyes are sending. #1 is saying, "WOW, this guy's too big!" #2 is saying, "I actually want YOU, not this dude.")

So there are little things that make a huge difference in whether a scene gets our dicks up. Pete picks up on the girl's discomfort. When her cervix is just too small to handle a colossal cock, but the guy doesn't have a plan for that, it ruins the scene. For rearadmiral, he's tuned into the girl(s) enjoying herself, and I'm very much in that camp. That's why her eyes make such an impact for me. If the guy's dick is huge, and she's a bit overwhelmed by that but she really goes for it, and it shows in her sex and in her eyes, that's a huge turn-on for me. If that's what the girl in Picture #1 projects, I'm likely to like that scene too.

RFB3

Edited by - RickFBerger3 on 3/21/2024 9:25:14 AM

Graciefan
Member

525 Posts
6/11
Posted - Mar 21 2024 : 9:40AM
Seeing a small cock is buzkill. It just looks bad. I think the worst case of this is when directors who shoot themselves have small dicks. Its like they just created a scenario to get laid and I cant get into those scenes.
Blueazure
Member

71 Posts
11/23
Posted - Mar 21 2024 : 10:20AM
Not a fan of huge dicks either but I still like seeing ones that are above average a commoner would still consider big. Just more visually pleasing.
InstantClassic
Senior Member

What Have You Done To My Little Cable Boy?
2966 Posts
5/10
Posted - Mar 21 2024 : 10:55AM
As far as proportions are concerned, I would say - yes, the bigger the butt, the bigger the dick should be. But it doesn't work for me in the other direction. Smaller butt and smaller dick is not an option for me. Regardless of the girl, I have a "camera standard" and anything below that is something...that I don't find visually appealing, sexy or in some cases credible.

The thing is, I don't really believe in porn sex. I think there are way too many interruptions and breaks in porn for me to believe that the girls are really into it. It's more work than sex in my opinion.
At the same time, porn positions are often more camera-friendly than suitable for sex. This means that you can often see that the guy is only pentrating with his tip, that he sometimes lacks length (due to the camera friendliness). At the same time, the girl screams and I think to myself... "Girl, that guy is barely touching you".

So since I don't believe in porn sex and that camera friendly positions with short, thin cocks are the slightest bit exciting for the girls, I tend to rely more on the visual appeal.

And of course I'm aware that girls don't have the best sex of their lives with Chris Diamond because of his size. But because of his size, it's easier for me to at least imagine it..... that's roughly how fantasy and porn work for me

Edited by - InstantClassic on 3/21/2024 10:56:04 AM

Whyspers2Scorpio
Senior Member

"Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite
2342 Posts
12/17
Posted - Jun 11 2024 : 1:13AM
I'd rather have a guy with a decent sized cock that women can work with rather than someone who is so over endowed that it limits the number of performers willing to work with him. That being said, I've seen a few male performers and I won't name names who packing a highlighter sized penis that doesn't look like it could begin to be felt by the woman accordingly. Plus there is the problem of blood flow because there's a performer who was known as Mr 18 who was hung like a horse but apparently couldn't get completely hard. If you research male talent through various interviews with female pornstars, I guarantee you that the same three names are cited as being the best: Manuel Ferrera, Mick Blue and Keiran. Nothing but praises from EVERYONE they work with, you'll never hear a complaint.
RickFBerger3
Member

You do you.
201 Posts
11/23
Posted - Jun 11 2024 : 10:20AM
^^^ The first time I saw Ferrara a few decades ago, I thought, there's no way the girl can really be enjoying a guy who treats her asshole like a jackhammer digging up a water main break. Turns out, you're right, that's not what the women think at all. Sometimes guy performers bring to the bed a talent we didn't think was associated with sex at all. Which is why they're them and we're just us, I guess.

I do have to admit, there are a great many scenes where the couple is really getting coupled, and the dick is doing exactly what I need to do for me to get invested in the scene, and I forget who the guy is and I don't have to pay attention to him for awhile. Then when it's done and he pulls out, I can see who he was, and I notice, hey, that's Mick Blue. In that sense, I think Mick is a good performer, like a great ballroom dancer. He's there to make the girl look great, and he does his job.

 
veridical
Member

176 Posts
3/24
Posted - Jun 12 2024 : 1:00AM
I don't know, guys. I love a great scene where the girl is getting railed by a giant dick. Piper Perri does it best, imo. So many great scenes where she magically takes just giant cocks. In one Dogfart scene with Alura Jensen ("Alura Jenson and Piper Perri share BBC"/"Watching My Mom Go Black"), shown below, even Alura is genuinely impressed that she was able to take the whole dick (well, mostly, depending on the scene/dick). There's just something very impressive and pleasing to me about watching a tiny girl who is able to pleasurably take a giant cock. And, with my breeding fetish, I admit I enjoy even more when it's a giant dick that's deep inside the girl as it fills her up. But those scenes are few and far between, unfortunately. (That said, scenes in which the girl is obviously in pain from a giant dick is not attractive to me, at least. If anything, it's frustrating to watch.)

"Alura Jenson and Piper Perri share BBC"/"Watching My Mom Go Black":
piper1point5.png
piper2.png

NannySpy scene "Nanny Pervs Out On Boss' Big Black Dick":
piper7.png
piper8.png

I don't know what the real name of this scene is, but obviously the video tag says "TestMyAss," but I wasn't able to find it on IAFD:
piper4.png
piper5.png

Amazing scenes, imo.




Jump To: