Edited by - mahisc94 on 6/7/2023 5:49:15 PM

[Link]

I'd be happy to see a MILF site operating separate from the others if it meant all the 30 and 40 somethings would be hired for that site and the main sites could go back to focusing on younger talent, but I doubt that'll happen. Will all the people endlessly squawking for "More MILFs! More MILFs! More MILFs!" go away and enjoy their dedicated MILF site?

I doubt it. If anything, we'll probably get more MILFs on the main sites now as they'll have less money available to land exclusive new talent.

As for the whole "it must be making them money or they wouldn't do it" narrative about how they've changed their sites, that is completely bogus. Businesses make self-sabotaging decisions all the time. There are a number of high profile business decisions backfiring in the headlines right now, for example. Often it takes companies years to recognise and rectify missteps and sometimes the whole ship will sink without them ever acknowledging they made a bad call.

Creative industries make bad decisions even more regularly. How many flops does Hollywood go through? And in the case of VMG we know for a fact that they will make creative decisions that contradict what their subscribers want because Laurent Sky said so, in declaring that their self-indulgent shift to "cinema" porn was done progressively because they didn't want to shock the "old school" audience who are "all about hardcore". They already admitted that they aren't making decisions based on what subscriber's want, so people need to stop using that as a defence.

As for no site having enough of what you're interested in to subscribe consistently, that is because they're ALL THE SAME... Because they ALL adopt the same scattergun, everything for everyone all at once approach which is inherently incapable of consistently satisfying anyone.

This site USED TO be consistent in its content. It USED TO satisfy a particular audience. That's why I USED TO be subscribed to it regularly. Why did those of us who enjoyed the "niche" content and were regularly subscribed have to see the site sacrificed to satisfy irregular subscribers?

They had a dedicated audience. They had cultural relevance. But they rejected them to become indistinct and inconsistent. Tedious and moody. Ugly and offensive to the senses. Consistent only with the casting and direction of the most divisive site on their network (Deeper).

That's not good business, no matter how much people speculate that there is some worthwhile rationale behind it.

Edited by - Murf99 on 6/9/2023 11:14:58 AM

[Link]

Edited by - Murf99 on 6/9/2023 11:13:30 AM

[Link]

Please tell us all of these alternatives that are out there.

[Link]

Please, tell us where all these alternatives are. If you want all critics of this site gone, as you plainly do, then you could at least point them towards these plentiful alternatives that you're adamant exist.

[Link]

Edited by - Reversecowgirlisboring on 6/11/2023 1:36:42 AM

[Link]

The truth is that you know that something has been lost with the changes this site and its counterparts have undergone, but it suited your requirements so you'll sstand no criticism of it.

Your major contributions to this thread the past few years is not praise or positivity but to routinely parachute in to harangue those who voice criticism and condescend and gaslight them.

This thread has been practically dead the past couple of years but rather than fill it with the praise you claim to desire from these threads, your only contribution is to police others' criticisms. Why can't you allow others their opinions?

Edited by - Murf99 on 6/11/2023 2:48:58 PM

[Link]

'The content on sites will change as time goes on. Producers come and go. Directors come and go. Each producer and director will bring their own visions with them. Cinematographers will come and go. Each cinematographer will bring their own vision with them. While it is perfectly understandable that people who like the old vision may not like the new vision, it gets old fast when people keep posting eh, I liked it better when... OG or not, there isn't a guarantee that things won't change over the years and people need to make a decision about when it is time for them to move on from one company to another. AND PEOPLE NEED TO UNDERSTAND THAT PEOPLE WHO LIKE WHAT VMG IS PRODUCING NOW DON'T WANT TO CONSTANTLY SEE PEOPLE WHINING ABOUT ...BUT I LIKED....BETTER'

This is my last word. DM me if you want to chat further about this.

[Link]

These threads don't exist only for approved opinions or for individuals to gatekeep. They exist for forum members to express opinions, post information and read updates.

Why is it too much to ask to just let people express their thoughts and discuss with other likeminded forum members without harassment? Why are the Mods being invoked just because people post opinions you happen to disagree with?

If you really have no more desire to discuss this then just leave people alone and ignore their posts if you disagree with them!

That's the simplest solution. That's always been the simplest solution. That way there need be no arguments, nobody needs to get banned and the Mods don't have to waste their time.

[Link]

I wonder who is this is it's probably gonna be Kendra Sutherland

[Link]

Hope you all enjoy the return of Kendra Sunderland on BLACKED!

GIFT FOR YOU

[Link]

Edited by - Flash on 6/21/2023 1:37:44 PM

[Link]

Edited by - Flash on 6/21/2023 1:40:05 PM

[Link]

So was it Richard Mann, Hollywood Cash, or Jamie Knoxx? 😂

[Link]

Edited by - jamesbrown13 on 7/1/2023 1:39:07 AM

[Link]

Twitter thread

[Link]

Edited by - Flash on 7/1/2023 7:42:51 PM

[Link]