I think these people above me are out of their minds. Nails was or is(I am not sure anymore) an AWESOME performer. One of those guys that isn't easy to replace. The denial is ridiculous here.
Er... yeah! He is hardly a huge loss, I think as far as the porn industry goes the only huge losses are when top girls retire. No one really cares if guys do. Especially guys who arent any good. Sorry pal, just the way it is. Plus, I dont think I ever saw one scene with Scott Nails where he showed any emotion in his scenes, he was like a robot.
Well he sure seems to be on your mind. You're blasting your opinion of him like its no ones business. If Nails is gone I think he's a loss because he fucks better than most dudes out there. Now Brazzers has very few good performers and the rest are floppy dicks. Or they take on that creepy Manuel Ferrara or Nacho Vidal persona. I like Nails because he fucked chicks good, without being creepy.
With your screen name being "interracial sex." I know already that you don't like Scott Nails, so of course your preexisting bias will inhibit you from appreciating his energy in scenes. That has been people's gripe about him. They think he's racist or something. Just because he doesn't fuck black women anymore. People think that he is somehow convincing white women to stay away from black men.... which is ridiculous.
"You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10
Posted - Jan 3 2012 : 12:16PM
Ya know, I don't know what else is needed from a stud that Scott Nails didn't provide? He isn't a creepy, out-of-shape ugly... He treats the girls respectfully... He has an attractive big cock... He gets hard and stays hard... He blows a good load... He keeps his mouth shut and does the job... A great porn-stud does all of the above -- all while keeping a low profile -- so that the viewer can focus on the girl. And, THAT is what makes good porn.
I just don't see how people can rag on him. He is very professional and I think he sets a good example of how a performer should conduct his/her career. Plus I think he is one of the more intelligent performers out there.
[Link]
keny Deactivated User
400 Posts 11/09
Posted - Jan 3 2012 : 3:13PM
i think he lost interest in porn he earn a lot of money so i think he decided to retire
He was a good performer. The huge tribal tattoo he has was distracting but beyond that I always wondered how he could always perform even when fucking chicks that were less than attractive. So why is this reliable performer no longer in the industry? Did he get hitched? Or, more likely, did he have some interpersonal conflicts with the owner(s) of Brazzers? That's my guess.
I hope the "Limp Bizkit Reject" is really gone. There really are a lot of Porn Fans out there that are sick of him. I'm so sick of him that every time a new Riley Steele trailer comes out I have to squint to make my eyes unfocused so I don't see his stupid face, or his fucking arm tattoo. It's this repetition that gets on your nerves, "ALWAYS him, they are ALWAYS picking him." It's the same feeling others have about James Deen.
I never saw a problem with him. And when it comes to male performers, that's exactly what I want to be able to say. He's a guy who didn't take away from me enjoying watching a hot girl getting fucked. There are a few male performers who could learn to be that way.
"I just don't see how people can rag on him. He is very professional and I think he sets a good example of how a performer should conduct his/her career. Plus I think he is one of the more intelligent performers out there." Yes that neck tattoo is very intelligent. Not.
Scott didn't bother me either. He wasn't bad looking, and was a decent performer, who most importantly, didn't talk a lot. I'd be fine with him returning to porn.
I watch porn for the ladyfolks. But it took more than usual effort to block this dude out. When they gave him lines? Disaster. Dopey as fuck.
[Link]
Blomkvist Deactivated User
129 Posts 12/11
Posted - Jan 5 2012 : 12:28AM
This is one of the things I dislike about the porn industry - It seems like 1/2 the people involved act like they're still in high school with nothing better to do than rag on each other. Seriously, what did Scott Nails do to deserve for this thread to be created let alone allowed to go unlocked? Personally, I thought he did a great job with his scenes. He also appeared to be a favorite of Jenna Haze - which alone makes me like the guy. So, what's the deal and whose vendetta is this?
Adult Entertainment Virtual Awards Nominees: "Male Porn Star of the Year" Anthony Rosano Derrick Pierce Eric John Erik Everhard James Deen Keiran Lee Lexington Steele Manuel Ferrara Mick Blue Mr. Pete Prince Yahshua Rocco Reed Scott Nails Tommy Gunn Xander Corvus
BORING! Scott was made to fuck women, he excels at it. How do you know he has a wife and kids? I thought he and Lacie Heart broke up. And even if he had a wife or fiancee. That shouldn't stop him from performing.
I read somewhere he is running a medical marijuana joint. Probably more profitable than being male talent in porn. He was a great performer IMO. Scott Nails fucking the female talent vs Kieran Lee showing his balls to the camera... no contest.
This might sound odd. But I think Scott Nails brought a sense of class and standard to a world that other wise does not have it. He always respected the women he worked with. He never slapped them, spit on them or degraded them. His scenes were aggressive and vigorous, but at the same time they were clean and sexy. And he is funny as fuck too boot. Something tells me he will come back, but if he doesn't. As a fan of porn, I am really disappointed.
[Link]
Blomkvist Deactivated User
129 Posts 12/11
Posted - Feb 16 2012 : 3:28AM
This whole thread is more than a little hinky. It's like someone with no respect for talent got pissed off that Scott simply didn't want to perform anymore and decided to trash him after the fact. Personally, I thought the guy did his job exactly they way he should - no b.s. during the scenes (e.g., no stupid commentary, no over the top displays of misogyny, no performance issues, etc.) Seriously, can any of these whiners name one LEGITIMATE issue they had with the guy?
Only he knows for sure. All I'm saying is that it's bad form to trash someone AFTER they've done a good job simply because you're upset they're not still doing that job.
probably the first guy i ever heard of actually retiring (unless peter north actually hung it up . . . . he had a scene with Breanne Benson as recently as a year ago though)
"You have sacrificed nothing and no one." 3689 Posts 8/10
Posted - Jun 23 2012 : 8:45AM
Always with the selective "quoting." Are you an editor from the Sean Hannity program? Reads a little different in context, doesn't it: He isn't a creepy, out-of-shape ugly... He treats the girls respectfully... He has an attractive big cock... He gets hard and stays hard... He blows a good load... He keeps his mouth shut and does the job... Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha
[Link]
Digital Lust Self-removed
All truth is parallel; All truth is untrue 768 Posts 10/11
Posted - Jun 23 2012 : 11:21AM
I didn't have a problem with Scott Nails. He was good with rough sex that didn't go overboard. I loved his scenes with Madison Ivy and Brook Adams.
Youl wrote he has a attractive big cock! As for context you are talking about a mopes performance. Either way, you are saying his cock is attractive to you. It's ok. And I don't watch those type of shows that you asked if I wrote for. Edited by - theDude008 on 6/23/2012 2:29:08 PM
Scott Nails @ AEBN
Posted - Jan 1 2012 : 6:06PM
