| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| biggins Member 657 Posts 5/09 | |
| Wild Billy Member I'm a Girl Watcher! 759 Posts 6/06 | |
| biggins Member 657 Posts 5/09 | |
| pat362 Senior Member 10083 Posts 3/10 | |
| Feet N Ass Senior Member 2249 Posts 12/19 | I'm not disappointed that she never did anal as I don't enjoy anal scenes where they are not enjoying it at all, and I think this would have been the case with Brooke. Just seeing her big natural tits bouncing in reverse cowgirl was enough for me. Always feet n ass. In that order. |
| biggins Member 657 Posts 5/09 | |
| EdgarAPoe1809 Deactivated User 35 Posts 5/20 | Why do you think it is "not an appropriate subject" to ask whether a celebrity and public figure like Brooke Wylde is pregnant or not? Do you say the same thing when the world asks whether Meghan Markle is pregnant or not? What's the difference between the two cases? I mean come on, give me a break. Celebrities make tons of money off of their fans and that comes with a price they must pay in return. Fans by definition want to know more about the celebrities they follow. There is a giant tabloid industry on TV and online devoted to feeding this consumer demand. Why is it "not appropriate" for fans of a pornstar celebrity to have the same demands as the fan of a regular Hollywood actor or actress? Take PWL as another example. It gave out the real names of thousands of pornstars without the consent of those stars. But so does Wikipedia. If I go to Tom Cruise's page I discover that his real name is Thomas Malpother IV. Do you think Tom Cruise wants this personal information out there? My guess is no. Why don't you condemn Wikipedia for providing Cruise's personal information to the world without his consent? And while you're at it, why don't you condemn IMDB, which does exactly the same thing vis-a-vis hundreds of pornstars, including many current ones. I can go to IMDB right now and find the real names of Lana Rhoades, Gianna Dior and Alex Grey, among many other starlets. Yet if I provide the same information on this forum I will be instantly attacked by you and probably banned from the forum. Why is that? Why the double standard? It isn't like IMDB is some fringe, disreputable outfit like PWL (I think we can agree on that point). You can't get any more reputable and mainstream than IMDB for information about Hollywood actors and actresses. And they treat stars like Tom Cruise and Lana Rhoades exactly the same way, just as they should in my view. Shouldn't this forum lighten up a little bit when it comes to a fan asking a simple, innocent question about whether Brooke Wylde is pregnant or not? Why must you instantly attack this fan as if he is a stalker. Maybe he is, but you don't know that. And it's not your job to serve as the Praetorian guard protecting pornstars. They're not little children. They're grown women who have made a choice to become public figures and should have to live with the consequences of their decision. |
| flexxxible Senior Member Current favs: Skylar Vox, Laney Grey, Aubree Valentine, Angel Youngs, Alyx Star, Blake Blossom 2185 Posts 5/10 | |
| biggins Member 657 Posts 5/09 | she had a gray/silver dress and her midsection looked "Pregnant" and disappeared shortly after. Only hope she is doing well. I have no interest in where she lives, what she is doing now. I just like the look when women are just a little bit pregnant. Thanks for everyones input, Biggins |
| redchambray Member 94 Posts 6/20 | |
| Seijuro Senior Member 1389 Posts 12/09 | |
| biggins Member 657 Posts 5/09 | |
| retroboyz Member 339 Posts 11/06 | |
| A-Town Down Member 949 Posts 3/22 | |
| casting_fan Member 580 Posts 6/22 | |
| Seijuro Senior Member 1389 Posts 12/09 |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |