Naughty America has a new site called Bick cock bully that I think it's based on this idea, at least judging on the one scene I've seen with Alura Jenson and Lil D.
The Naughty America site is mostly sexual coercion/blackmail, they generally make it so that the woman is having the sex "willingly" but in exchange for something else.
Pestering would make for a fun scene. Like a bad date, where she kinda likes the guy but would rather go home and take a warm bath. Emotionally, it's dull but on edge, like visiting someone's home and trying to figure out a polite exit while they drone on about their vacation pictures from 10 years ago.
[Link]
Irons Deactivated User
113 Posts 10/19
Posted - Dec 10 2019 : 10:40PM
mmmm.... i would say :
Behind The Green Door The Fashionistas Le Parfum De Mathilde Talk Dirty To Me Inside Deep Throat Farmer's Daughters
Lena Paul will be launching a new series of movies where she harasses female performers into having sex with black guys by accusing them of being racist if they don't. It's a reality TV type deal, she and her fellow wokes will use social media to attack the girls and even physically chase them out of the industry. You didn't hear it from me, but word is the producers are hoping they can bully a girl in to committing suicide, so the publicity will be free.
Not really, it's called satire. You're not offended, you're just lazy.
Edited by - bangersandmash on 12/12/2019 1:53:00 PM
She and other self-serving woke bullies opined on twitter that girls that don't have scenes with black guys are racist and should not be allowed to work in the industry. Her flawless reasoning was that she has sex in scenes with people she doesn't find attractive, so that can be no excuse. Which also means that men who don't have sex with other men in porn scenes are homophobic, because as Lena has proven, not being attracted to someone is no bar to having sex with them. Straight male porn stars can bend over and get fucked in gay scenes and straight men can take ED medication and fuck men(they can watch straight porn to get aroused) and remember if any male performer refuses to do this they must be homophobic as proven by Lena and the woke army's infallible logic.
^ Other than your need to have a COMPLETE non-sequitur in this thread, which you decided to turn into a condemnation of a viewpoint instead of talking about scenes that fit what the OP was looking for, there is another problem with your posts.
The argument for a male having sex with another male is different than the argument for a male having sex with a female that he isn't into (or, in this case, you were initially talking about female performers having sex with males they aren't into, but whatever, you crossed over to talking about male performers, so we'll stay there for now).
If a male performer works with a female performer, he puts his dick in her pussy and thrusts a lot. That's generally the job. OK I know sometimes there are anal-only scenes, but most anal scenes still have a lot of penis-in-vag action, and certainly the non-anal scenes have a lot of that. I guess there's BJ-only scenes too, but stay with me here. Same skill set whether he finds the woman attractive or not. (And many male performers will tell you that they often do not find the woman attractive, though usually it's something about their character that makes the particular performer off-putting.)
If a male performer works with a male performer (and bottoms as you described), he is getting anally penetrated a lot. That's a different skill set.
Your first post was a thinly-veiled means of opening the door for the rant in your second post. It was not a good-faith attempt at participating meaningfully in this thread. If you want to rant about how you disagree with Lena Paul's position (which you're perfectly entitled to do), this was not the thread to do so.
If your intention was to make zero sense and waffle on about some nonsense then I'd simply prefer you just admit you were offended by my opinion and that it contradicts your own self serving views of interracial and those that refuse to do it. I was asked to clarify my original point, so that's what I did and yes my intention was to draw attention to the grotesque hypocrisy of the far left and their bullying of individuals using McCarthyism to achieve their goals.
But as I said, not really, my original comment was satire. Which is often lost on po faced puritanical moral fascists who are so convinced of their moral certainty that they forget to laugh at themselves.
And as for your convoluted attempt at dismissing my point about males refusing to have sex with other men being homophobic under the law of woke logic, you are conveniently ignoring men who refuse to penetrate other men. I look forward to your rambling, incoherent explanation that ignores the relevant information I've already stated that dismisses your entire point, before you even made it.. were you drunk when you wrote that?
Edited by - bangersandmash on 1/28/2020 5:37:43 AM
Edited by - bangersandmash on 1/28/2020 5:38:30 AM
^ No one doubts that it was satire when you said there will be a series of videos where Lena Paul does what you said she would do in your first post.
What I doubt was the sincerity behind your satire.
In other words, it wasn't satire about this thread's subject. Its goal was, as you've described, "to draw attention to the grotesque hypocrisy of the far left and their bullying of individuals using McCarthyism to achieve their goals".
But that's not what this thread was about. You deliberately took this thread in a direction it wasn't supposed to go, just so you could get your rant out. And hid it behind "oh I was just using satire in my first post. The only reason I made a second post is because someone asked me about it." That's BS. You made the first post hoping someone would ask you to clarify, so you could go full rant-mode in your second post. You baited the hook and hoped someone bit, and they did.
There was never any attempt - or even desire? - by you to discuss scenes where girls are "bullied into sex". There was only an attempt to slam people whose opinion you disagree with, in a thread that had nothing to do with that opinion.
Back on topic, lots of JAV explores this theme. If you can get by the pixelation, JAV porn is actually pretty hot. In average I think the girls are better performers than your average US/Euro girls, and since they can't focus on the hardcore angles as much they do everything else much better as a result.
I remember a porn series called Tough Love where some scenes had the premise of bullying the girl into having sex.Bailey Brooks had a scene where the premise was that her husband forces her to have sex with his friend and himself iirc.The whole Tough Love series had premises where the girl was bullied and made to have some sex.
[Link]
suavehuman Deactivated User
301 Posts 1/20
Posted - Jan 28 2020 : 5:44PM
This whole thread really cracks me one. One person asked for bullying porn, another person responded with a form of bullying porn (aka Lena Paul initiative), and then everyone else is here offended that he brought light to the fact that some women don't like black guys.
Come on guys, this is porn! Not real life! Get a life! Every woman has a right to choose her partner whether it be in terms of race, skin color, sex, weight, height, language, and whatever other criteria.
Why do so many men get offended if a chick doesn't want to have sex with a specific type of man? If a chick doesn't like my type, I'll just move on and find someone who likes my type. We all have preference and choices. Simple!
But very very unfortunately it feels like many users here think that just because a woman is in porn, she shouldn't say no to another male porn actor. This is ridiculous!
Literally not a single person in this thread has argued for performers being forced to work with people they don't want to (in real life, as opposed to in the scenario being portrayed). No one in this thread has argued for more IR porn or whatever else.
You, like the other poster I was addressing, seem to be arguing against some behaviour/ideas you feel you have observed elsewhere. But not in this thread.
Asking about that topic has nothing to do with our rules. It's purely due to FOSTA/SESTA which makes it a crime to discuss that topic online because its overbroad wording makes any discussion of it potentially be considered "promotion" and is therefore illegal. The site owners don't want to go to jail. It's purely a practical decision and has nothing to do with the morality of the site owners or moderators or members.
[Link]
lagoulue Deactivated User
1132 Posts 8/18
Posted - Feb 1 2020 : 1:48PM
What a terrible way of seeing things.
[Link]
suavehuman Deactivated User
301 Posts 1/20
Posted - Feb 1 2020 : 3:49PM
I'm sorry that you feel offended that some women don't want to have sex with certain men.
[Link]
hoochimama Deactivated User
1437 Posts 5/10
Posted - Feb 3 2020 : 2:03PM
It's all sexual exploitation/bullying/rape! /feminism off
hazeher, hotandmean, scenes with plots like "she was caught cheating on her husband/doing something bad now she sucks dick to keep it quiet!" are all fairly vanilla and match my idea of "bullying".
Depending on how rapey you want your smut to be search for harder keywords like tricked/bullied /blackmailed/coerced/forced/raped or similar keywords. Niche/fetish sites like clips4sale, iwantclips, nicheclips should have the hardest stuff.
I assume the casting couch stuff does plenty of actual real bullying/coercing into sex, but if the scenes aren't acted that way they probably don't do anything for the fetishists.
If you spot a GG/dick-dodging actress touching a penis in fetish scenes let me know.
Not exactly what you're looking for, but the squirt lesbian gangbang with Keisha Grey is a little like that in the sense all the girls bully Keisha into squirt :P
Hardcore Bangers 2 - review by Captain Jack
Posted - Dec 9 2019 : 11:22PM
