One of my big problems with today's porn is the ultra tight camera angles - the camera being way too close and not showing enough of the male and having the woman take up the entire dam screen real estate, or having half her body take up the entire screen. Now, obviously I can understand this in pov scenes or vr scenes. And I do want part of the set and part of the video to have tight camera angles. But we can walk and chew gum at the same time here. I mean, scenes average around 39 minutes and pic sets average around 300 pics or so. The video and the pic sets should be 33% wide shots, 33% medium shots, and 33% tight shots. There is just no artistry in some of these scenes and pic sets. The worst culprit are the fantasyhd / passion hd / exotic 4k / tiny 4k network. People complain that these sites are too "clean" or too "artsy". That isnt their problem. I dont mind them being clean or artsy, I like that for the variety. The problem is that the scenes for these sites are too dam sterile and technical. You dont even hear the performers getting excited for the cum shot. They are screwing and then out of the blue the scene fades into the cumshot. It sucks.
I just dont remember porn being like this 15 years ago. The porn scenes back then seemed more like actual movies or documentaries, with better framing, mixed in with some tight shots. I was looking at some Chloe Amour photo sets that I downloaded a long time ago from Passion HD, and there were virtually no wide shots. It is hot as hell to see too full bodied performers together, but you dont see that in these Passion HD sets. Its horrible.
What pisses me off is I think porn companies have resorted to this because of guys complaining about seeing the male's face. If you have a problem with seeing the male's face, stay the fuck away from b/g porn. Or stick to only the pov or vr videos. That aint your dick on video. Accept it.
Am I the only one that hates this??