Most Beautiful Porn Star of the 90's 967 Posts 12/05
Posted - Jul 16 2008 : 10:55PM
I agree, celebrities have nothing on porn chicks. I don't find Angelina Jolie attractive at all, maybe I am the only one who has this opinion LOL. And I find alot of them to be flat out plain looking to be honest
Porn chicks usually have even more makeup on though. I prefer the most "natural" look possible. If I can't see the makeup then thats the best. Angelina Jolie does nothing for me. Neither do most of the girls in that article, with or without makeup. Gwyneth still looks cute though, and surprisingly Victoria Beckham looks great without makeup. If only she could gain 20 pounds and grow back her long hair (and enter porn :P ).
Angelina Jolie is a goddess, if I could do her, I'd let her kill me afterwards because life had reached its apex, all else would be decline, decay, and despair. Edited by - algaliarept on 7/17/2008 5:39:46 AM
Their job is to look hot on film. They don't have to look hot walking down the street in the city.
[Link]
smallcock Deactivated User
131 Posts 8/07
Posted - Jul 17 2008 : 6:21AM
Why is it that all of a sudden she's the hottest thing in the world after she got hitched to Brad Pitt? She wasn't even on the radar before then. She's attractive, but not a Goddess. So many women with better face and body. Edited by - smallcock on 7/17/2008 6:21:33 AM
There are beautiful women from all walks and stations in life. These celebrity women are just that, celebrity. With media exposure and such. Same with porn queens.
I have to agree that porn women are often prettier than celebrities with better bodies. I figure it is because when you are selecting for singing you consider voice and dancing ability on top of looks, for acting you consider acting talent and screen presence. Well for porn you just want a woman that looks good naked on screen, has a face pretty and sensual enough to look good while getting fucked, a sexual presence that arouses and inflames sexual desire, and the atheleticism and endurance to fuck for a long-time in different positions and in different places without losing the first three traits. The stars that do well often have all the above traits. The one's that don't have minor careers. That's why I think women in porn are often much more attractive than celebrity women. It's their job to be physically and sexually attractive because that is what we want as consumers.
Not true. In fact one of the reason so much was made over her hooking up with Brad was because they were both considered two of the "hottest" celebs in Hollywood. Angelina was constantly in the tabloids and being talked about before she hooked up with Brad.
When it comes to casting superhero movies I usually can think of many pornstars that look the part but can't think of many "legit" actresses who do. Many pornstars have over the top bodies and looks that fit those type of roles. If I had to cast a Wonder Woman or Tomb Raider or She-Hulk movie there are plenty of amazon shaped goodlooking women in porn that look the part. In Hollywood "thin is in" and many of them have the bodies to pull off the sort of look needed to fill out those costumes. Many pornstars an exaggerated "sexiness" I like.
[Link]
the unknown pervert Deactivated User
I'd like to stay but I've got a plane to catch. 3243 Posts 5/06
Posted - Jul 17 2008 : 9:24PM
Are you kidding? She's been on the radar at least since her and Billy Bob Thornton began swapping bottles of blood, long before Pitt ever entered the picture. Considering her father is Jon Voight one could argue she has been on some radar pretty much her whole life.
There have been some really beautiful pornchicks and some really beautiful mainstream actresses. What bothers me is the pressure to broaden appeal to the widest possible audience that leads to a uniformity of appearance amongst female celebrities [ more so than male celebrities ]. That is to say, we all have our own opinion re what we consider beautiful, but rather than allow these women to retain their own look, and perhaps appeal more strongly to a narrower audience... both industries seem to pressure women to adopt a sort of "generic" look in an attempt to cast the net wide. So perfectly attractive women like Jennifer Grey and Ashlee Simpson feel compelled to get nosejobs... Hillary Duff gets her teeth capped... and Lindsay Lohan fries her freckles off. Not to mention the whole issue of weight. All I'm saying is... sometimes I see chubby, big-nosed, pale, freckled girls who are quite lovely.
I think that's the thing about her: It's not that she's THAT great looking, IMHO, but she has that air about her that just screams "dirty girl". I mean, there are certain girls who you just KNOW have done everything and that's the fantasy that surrounds Jolie.
As for Angelina Jolie, I only think she looks good now because she's cleaned up her looks. she looks classy now, when a few years ago, she was kinda gothic looking. but I also find porn stars way hotter. but my all time favorite mainstream actress is Salma Hayek. for me, she is IT!!
What's intriguing about Jolie in particular is that she seems a little freaky. She used to wear a vile of her man's blood around her neck and was so passionate that she would on a whim tattoo her beau's name on her at the drop of a hat. Man, who wouldn't want to look down and see those lips wrapped around your johnson and those eyes looking up at you!!! However, she is so seemingly freaky, she might just as readily smother you to death in your sleep as cook you breakfast in the morining...lol. Oh, and although most of her films are shit, Jessica Biel is a fox. Edited by - algaliarept on 7/18/2008 8:10:30 PM
Yes, chubby, big nosed, pale, freckled girls can be quite lovely but they're also a dime a dozen and all of the place. How excited is the public supposed to get over an actress that looks like the average girl? If Jessica Simpson looked like most of the girls you see in Walmart or Burger King who'd care about her or give her a second look? For many actresses and celebs their looks are what makes them money. If they don't do what they can to look as good as they can to as wide an audience as they can they'll be cast aside as the next goodlooking girl who fits that image comes along.
Actually, I'd say that's a fallacy. On any given trip to the mall, I see an overwhelming number of girls who in fact DO look like Jessica Simpson. Which is precisely my point. These girls don't come out of the womb like that. They invariably feel pressure to conform to standards set by the media.Very excited if she has an ounce of talent.I agree completely. I don't argue the economics behind the trend. I'm just personally bothered by the results. I wouldn't say that any of these girls are unattractive, they're just all attractive in the same unspectacular way. But I grew up in the 70's when standards were a little more forgiving. I had a crush on Kristy McNichol ferchrissake lol.
Posted - Jul 16 2008 : 10:21PM