^She's had 1 new scene released this year in February, the only other releases she's credited on (per IAFD) are compilations of previously released web scenes. Looks like she's only active on OnlyFans now. And her Twitter bio says that she now only interacts with fans on OF so I'd take that as a sign she's transitioning away from studio work. I browsed her main page and it looks like she updates there daily. Although with OF it's always very hit-and-miss in terms of decent content.
As far as I know she is married to James Deen and has retired. She didn't announce it but most don't anyway. Her agent was Spiegler but she is not even registered as a model on that site anymore.
The OF route is often the logical choice for performers who have a decent online following and can cultivate a strong enough subscriber base to no longer need studio work. Chanel has been around long enough that I could see her being able to make that angle work. Although, the content has to be decent enough to get people to stay around. At the moment it doesn't sound like there's much interesting.
OF is one gigantic scam. It's ruined porn. 99% of the "content" on there are iPhone videos. Nobody puts any effort into making porn on that site, it's all poor-quality phone clips.
"Pornography: That which excites, whether from approval or disapproval." ~ Leonard Rossite 2342 Posts 12/17
Posted - Jan 12 2022 : 10:02PM
OF isn't a scam and you appear to forget that porn is an INDUSTRY, one that has been the victim of rampant piracy. OF is a way for adult performers to make money, what is so wrong with that?
OF is a scam. Most of the top pornstars are not doing porn anymore because of it and that would be ok but here's the thing. Most if not all of the top OF creators and pornstars don't even run their OF accounts. So if you subscribe to a girl or pornstar on OF and you send them a message, which you have to pay for too btw, you are not really talking to them you are most likely talking to someone they hired or a manager or assistant.