^If she is able to do that then more power to her but I wouldn't necessarily use her appearance on one episode of Euphoria as a good example. Especially when she was basically the token naked girl. Did you notice that the star of the show who shared screen time with Chloe didn't have to take her clothes off in a scene where everyone else had to?
I'm happy for her, and at least it's a show that I already watched (I don't have to go out of my way to watch her). But selfishly, I hope/don't think she's going Sasha Grey right now.
^^ My intention here isn't to be critical of Chloe, because this likely wasn't her decision. Chloe is stunning. Flawless. Beautiful. Choose your superlative. Why, why, why would the director want to hide that beautiful face with a mask? I can only hope it comes off early in the scene. Hiding Chloe's face is a crime against nature.
I like porn and the Golden Age of Porn 1947 Posts 9/21
Posted - Jan 31 2022 : 9:49AM
Here's how the second episode was going to go until another actor spoke up. From DailyBeast: "We just met and said, 'Hey, how are you?' and then shot the scene," remembers Cherry of her on-screen boyfriend. "It probably would've been more comfortable had we had a little more time to know each other. Sam wanted to do the scene with me completely naked and Tyler was like, 'That's a lot,' so they decided not to. But I was covered in fake blood and just felt so good being on set."
Like I said Chloe shouldn't trust Hollywood, just use them for more work in porn and OF.
She's also big time modelling too! NY and London fashion weeks. Just in the last week or so. I'll miss her in porn but I'm happy for her mainstream success!
^ Happy for Chloe. I do remember posting some time ago I liked her adventurist sense of style. I found the link to the Daily Beast article very interesting. During the pandemic hiatus she made way more money on Only Fans than she would doing mainstream porn. Also she had trouble leaving Riley Reynolds's Hussie Models. The linked article in the Daily Beast points out he has a criminal past.
Seems she is indirectly retired from mainstream based on her twitter feed .If indeed she is moved on and wanted to concentrate mainstream roles rather than porn ,good for her .
That's weird. I guess they don't want porn 'brands' following her. I know I've seen individual pornstars following her IG content.
[Link]
SouthernMaestro Deactivated User
115 Posts 3/21
Posted - Mar 31 2022 : 6:34PM
They definitely don't want those two brands following or commenting on her stuff that's for sure.
[Link]
DRACULA1 Deactivated User
50 Posts 8/21
Posted - Apr 13 2022 : 4:49AM
That's a ridiculous statement. Why would she possibly shoot more porn scenes for, what 1K for a 12 hour shoot, when she has real work and real opportunities now? A legit UK modeling agency reps her now. She's walking in major fashion shows in London and Milan. EUPHORIA is now the second most watched show in the history of HBO, behind only GAME OF THRONES and she is guaranteed to be a part of season 3 because she was a breakout star in the latest season.
It's not about any shame or stigma that comes with porn, it's about the fact, With all these doors opening up for her, PORN IS NOT WORTH HER TIME BECAUSE PORN IS SMALL TIME.
I like porn and the Golden Age of Porn 1947 Posts 9/21
Posted - Apr 14 2022 : 1:14AM
"She also developed an eating disorder. "It all started when this agent I had when I was in porn said to my face that I was fat," she explained. "He said, 'Everyone says that you're fat and the fastest way to lose weight is by not eating.' he said that to me and I was like, 'What the f***?'" She's been in recovery since June 2020, which "completely changed my life."
well the ADT profile for her links to it so it had to be her at some point. wonder if it's been taken over by a scammer or if she's just keeping it separate so she can continue to do sex work on the DL
The new handle (@_chloe_cherry_) still has all of her old porn before Euphoria started in January. I went as far back November. Her old handle ChloeCherryxxx is probably a scammer. Otherwise, why would she have a line like this under the handle? '18+I buy content. Dropbox for $150.'
^ only _chloe_cherry_ is genuine, chloecherryxxx and chloecherryxxxx are fake accounts. The 3 x is the one where it is advertised to buy content ... that's what she is mentioning in the tweet above she doesn't do. And the one with the 4 x is an older one (from 2019), also 99.99% not genuine, which doesn't mention it buys content, but has its last updates in 2019.
I was following on twitter the genuine _chloe_cherry_, back then under the chloecherryxxx handle. But if the owner changes the handle, you automatically follow the new handle (because internally, you follow just a number), so when you later type "@chloe" in a tweet, it automatically suggests "_chloe_cherry_" (because you're following her), and not "chloecherryxxx" (the old handle - only if you type that in from memory, you link to the wrong one). So the chloecherryxxx account must be someone who changed it to chloecherryxxx after the original chloecherryxxx was renamed to _chloe_cherry_. Unfortunately, there is no (public) interface to query the history of an account... what would help weed out a lot of these fake ones. Because when you would then see that the current chloecherryxxx was initially john1234, you'd probably spot the fake ones relatively quickly.
Posted - Sep 3 2021 : 11:20PM
