^Probably because they get in the business on a whim and don't do any research.
[Link]
Dragon Sign Deactivated User
3381 Posts 12/13
Posted - Jan 29 2017 : 7:24AM
BGG + Creampie, one of four scenes, big league studio, and a good old BTS rolling in the bonus features. I'd put 30 bucks on it directly and I knew I'd get a winning situation going.
^^ She's no longer Ashley Ackerman and is listed just for standard BG at the moment. There is a possibility she was tricked into doing that because not sure who would consiously give up their first DP for some niche low-tier site. Possibly changed her name to make a fresh start - hopefully Greg Lasnky doesn't come across that scene and books her for Tushy like it's her first time.
Photos by @nigel_dictator [Tweet is no longer available] Pictures look nice - too bad male talent will make her look like a mess during the actual scene just like he does with everyone else.
[Tweet is no longer available] [Tweet is no longer available] [Tweet is no longer available] [Tweet is no longer available] Edited by - zaxmate on 5/7/2017 5:15:43 PM
Mike Nasty's practices seem a bit shady - apparently he tried to get her to do stuff off camera. There's a shitstorm going on between Plush Talent & Chloe vs Mike Nasty on Twitter which could go legal over the use of her new alias. [Tweet is no longer available] Edited by - The New Guy on 5/12/2017 10:18:45 PM
@thenewguy. Girls lie all the time. They (her & plush) have a problem with mike nasty using her new name, maybe plush wanted to charge for her 1st IR with the new name or something IDK. About the sex off camera thing, she offered no proof but you're so gullible you just believe it right off bat. I'm interested to see where this goes but don't just jump on a side until all evidence has been presented.
She wasn't the one who brought this to the public eye. She said all this in DMs with Mike Nasty. I only know about that because Mike Nasty leaked the DM about her complaints (around using her new alias 'Chloe Scott' when the forms she signed with him were under another alias, 'Ashley Ackerman') on twitter earlier today trying to mock her saying he'd gladly go to court over the use of her new alias. However, in that same DM she called him out for illegally trying to coerce her into off-camera stuff. Remember this is in DMs - its private - she had't publically called him out for it. It was Mike Nasty who brought this to the public by leaking the DMs. Why would she lie to him in private if he and she both know he didn't do it? There's no gain at all - if she had blasted him openly on twitter in front of everyone, then maybe a case could be made for why she could by lying to drum up support, but she didn't. This was all said in private - she DMed him rather than hang the laundry out in front of everyone; and I don't see why she'd accuse him of something in private if they both know it didn't happen. Also he didn't deny it in the replies visable in his screenshot, the only thing he contested was the use of her knew alias and said he's willing to go to court over it. Now consider that, in the scene; right at the start, Mike does say something along the lines of "I've already had a sneak peak" or something like that, which in light of this is awfully suspicious. It is almost like a confession. He has now deleted that tweet of the DMs, probably because it was a bit incriminating, and likely on advice by his lawyer; I regret not taking a screenshot of it now... I did embed his tweet with the DM leaks when I made that post, back when that tweet was still up, but like I said: he deleted it; hence why the "tweet is no longer available" on my post now. Also, please understand I never said he definitely did it in my post, I said things like 'apparently' etc. Its just that, in light of what I had seen, I leant more towards believing her because it makes no sense why she'd lie in private - there's no gain in that for her. Edited by - The New Guy on 4/26/2017 5:31:58 PM Edited by - The New Guy on 4/26/2017 5:32:36 PM
[Tweet is no longer available] [Tweet is no longer available] It's unfortunate that she was clueless at the time and made mistake giving up all her "firsts" for a niche, irrelevant site and is now being harrassed by it's owner trying to ruin her career - she looks good enough to deserve exclusive first scenes with legit major companies but at the same time not sure if she cares about that since it looks like her first anal under a new name is going to be with another irrelevant company. Another misstep was signing with Plush Talent which is a far cry from a legit agency.
She's probably already shot with other companies Edit: She shot with Tushy, scene revealed today; releases this weekend. Edited by - The New Guy on 5/3/2017 1:47:26 PM
^ Great to see Chloe at Tushy Too bad it's with JVJ, she has such a nice gape. A bigger dick would have opened her wider. Hope more anal is coming up with major studios!
I really like her. Another beauty who is very friendly with Her fans on social media. I hope things go well for her from here on out. She's also gone from ok looking to hot. The change in her hair alone really made a huge difference. She's very much box cover material now. Edited by - GeneralChechik on 5/6/2017 1:51:36 AM
As far as I'm aware, she could be shooting an anal scene for a niche site very soon along with Whitney Wright too. Based on this, I suppose she hasn't signed any sort of contract like that. Therefore, I would imagine she will probably be shooting other anal scenes for mainstream sites too. Edited by - The New Guy on 5/12/2017 10:21:07 PM
Without a doubt. Chloe is blowing up right now. She's getting so many bookings she's even having to turn some requests down. She's also a very sweet girl with such a great personality. I don't know if you guys follow her on twitter or not but the little video clips her and Whitney Wright post as so funny. Those two are just to much! You can follow Chloe Scott at twitter.com/thechloescott.
Well well Kelli. Maybe you should slow down "other buissness things" then. There's still plenty of time for that 2nd income and you might be able to milk that cow for a longer period of time!?! Just a thought.
I have no idea who you are but I don't like your implication that Chloe Scott is doing anything that isn't 100% above board. And as far as "milking that cow", I don't milk anything. I'm not her agent, nor do I get paid for any scenes she books. That's between her and her agent. Shame on you for being a little hateful troll. May you and your family burn in hell. Love and Kisses, Kelli