All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 763 > Why is anal not that popular for porn teens?
Page 1 of 2 Last
AuthorPost
shameless
Deactivated User

Moscow
1313 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 24 2003 : 4:27AM
I say: because pussy-only seems to be payed too high. Or put the other way round: trying anal does not bring them that much more money. It seems simply not being worth the uncertainty (will it hurt? will I like that? etc), because a newcomer will just earn a few bucks more on it.

Therefory my suggestion: I know porn companies all have to fellow their film-budgets, money does not grow on trees for nowbody. But why not siply lower the pussy-only prices a bit and double or triple the anal fares. If a girl gets double her fare if she does anal, she will be much more likely to give it just a try.
...and hopefully her professional male partner(s) make her feel confortable about; and she carries on.

I am a bit turned down recently by that softer approach of many teen series, where we consumers get less than average anal and nearly no DP/DAP. I dont say a completely new girl shall jump staight into DAP in her first shoot, but trying out anal as soon as possible could not harm, IMHO.

Do you (producers,...and fans) think that would be a viable anal incentive?

2Big
Member

200 Posts
4/03
Posted - Apr 24 2003 : 9:22AM
I hate to be cynical about this, but I doubt that that many new girls are "teenagers."

Yeah, they all say they are "totally new to this" and "only 19" but I have my doubts.....

sk

aybesea
Senior Member

Caroline Cage - Hungarian Hottie!
1485 Posts
5/02
Posted - Apr 24 2003 : 9:25AM
Shameless,

I do like the way you think! Money is a prime motivator.

Porn Scout
Deactivated User

3735 Posts
10/02
Posted - Apr 24 2003 : 3:42PM
The solution is for porn companies to place less emphasis on teen titles. Right now, there are so many of these being produced that a certain level of demand is created for youngish looking new talent to star in them. Consequently, anal gets moved down the priority list. If it were me, I would not do teen titles at all but instead would integrate new girls into other titles so that anal could be made more of a priority. I'm also firmly of the opinion that if you have six girls lined up for a teen title and none of them do anal, you can change that by going to each one and offering way more money. I'm sure at least two or three would take the deal, especially if you weren't offering that much for the pussy-only scene to begin with.
noodlegirl
Adult DVD Today

73 Posts
7/01
Posted - Apr 24 2003 : 4:34PM
Give the girls a break they will do it eventually if they are into it! I personally think its hard enough to be on camera having sex let alone taking it up the ass!lol
 
Tom
Member

833 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 24 2003 : 4:59PM
I ran a search on Anabolic's "Bring Um Young" series which supposedly guarantees that all the girls are teenagers.

After looking at the girls that I have seen doing anal that also appear in that series I would say there are more teens doing anal than you would think. Assuming of course that they are really teens like 2Big says.


Porn Scout
Deactivated User

3735 Posts
10/02
Posted - Apr 24 2003 : 8:36PM
In my opinion, Bring 'Um Young is one of Anabolic's worst series. Yes, they do occasionally have so-called "teens" taking it up the butt. But usually, these aren't the prettiest girls. Normally, the ones they have doing anal in that series are pretty marginal as far as looks go. That's why I think these teen themed series are such a waste. It's just not possible to consistently find hot looking newcomers "teens" that are also willing to do anal. Occasionally, yes, but not very often. But if you are a porn producer and you have to put together five or six scenes, you have to make compromises, and anal is usually one of them.
Sir Noel Plum
Senior Studmuffin

1001 Posts
2/03
Posted - Apr 24 2003 : 8:51PM
Anal is a skill and not an easy one to learn. Quite rightly most women are anxious about trying it and so I'd imagine would wish to gain some experience off-screen first before letting 'Mr BigKnob' do his worst in front of the cameras.

This is where the cafe of life serves us a slice of reality pie. I've never been fucked in the ass (and have no great aspirations in that dept) but I certainly would want to gain a little confidence in the comfort of my own home first before I would consider doing so on film. If you ask me 'how much for Jewel D'Nyle to fuck you on-screen' my price may be quite low (okay, very low ) but start including a ten inch strap-on in the mix and it becomes a different kettle of fish. Why should young women whose anuses are like mine, virginal minus a finger or so, feel any differently?


Having said all of this I do agree with Shameless inasmuch as, when I have seen rates for anal and non-anal, I am surprised at how small the differential is considering all the extra considerations and implications of the (beautiful) act.

SNP.

Tom
Member

833 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 24 2003 : 11:02PM
[/quote]
In my opinion, Bring 'Um Young is one of Anabolic's worst series. Yes, they do occasionally have so-called "teens" taking it up the butt. But usually, these aren't the prettiest girls. Normally, the ones they have doing anal in that series are pretty marginal as far as looks go. That's why I think these teen themed series are such a waste. It's just not possible to consistently find hot looking newcomers "teens" that are also willing to do anal. Occasionally, yes, but not very often. But if you are a porn producer and you have to put together five or six scenes, you have to make compromises, and anal is usually one of them.
[/quote]

Right off the bat let me say no offense attended but I must respectfully disagree with your above quote.

Let me explain. First, I am in no way a shill for Anabolic, but this was the only series I know of that prints the supposed "real" ages of the girls right on the box cover. I thought that would be a quick way to see if your assumption about teen girls not doing anal right out of the gate was correct. For this discussion, if we assume that Anabolic has indeed printed the "correct" ages of the girls in the Bring Um Young series, here is a list of the ladies who are teenagers AND do anal - Jessie J., Shyla, Gauge, Bella Donna, Kacey, Aurora Snow, Monica Sweetheart, Kinky, Rochelle Devore, Sunrise Adams (??) Judy Star, Paris, Brook Ballentyne, Nickey Reed and Sabina Black.

Yeah I know that some of them aren't in the biz any more but there are quite a few "lookers" in that group and they all have done anal in TONS of releases.

I will agree that this group of ladies is a special breed and many of the newbies today keep the ass "off limits."

I want to add that Jenna Haze came on the scene with anal and she is hot as hell. I don't know her age however. You can also possibly add Ashly Blue, Jasmine Lynn and Angela Crystal to the list, however I don't know if any of these girls are under 20. Sorry!


Edited by - Tom on 4/24/2003 11:04:16 PM

Edited by - Tom on 4/24/2003 11:12:00 PM

Cyberchicken
Member

900 Posts
4/02
Posted - Apr 24 2003 : 11:43PM
The more things a girl is willing to do the more work they can get. When a new girl enters the biz she is fresh, and that's often reason enough to hire her, but once the shine starts to fade, she's got to push the edge in order to find more work.

So they'll start with mainstream stuff, and as work becomes more difficult to find, slowly drift into ir, anal, double anal, gang bangs, and swallowing.

So to answer your question, it's smart for a new girl to put off anal as long as possible, if they're trying to stretch out (hehe) their career.

CC

futureofporn
Member

658 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 25 2003 : 2:38AM
Think about the most popular young girls
Taylor Rain
Ashley Blue
Monica Sweetheart
Aurora Snow
Bella Donna
Guage
Plus so many more, they all do anal. It is not a coincidence. They may not be teenagers anymore, but anal is a crucial element for any big starlet.
pinkincide
Member

229 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 25 2003 : 7:36AM
I think the decision to start doing anal makes a girl face a lot of other hard decisions so they tend to postpone it. It makes her decide which branch her porn career will take--will it hurt her chances of becoming a contract girl? Will she lose fans who don't like anal? Does she really want to commit to being this nasty? Not to mention the fact that a lot of these girls still hold on to silly illusions about becoming real actresses.

But aren't we all idealistic idiots at that age?

Tom
Member

833 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 25 2003 : 10:04AM
I wonder about the girls that come out to LA and go right to the anal in their first scenes? Take Amee Donovan and Giovanna for example. Both girls young, great looking and new to porn. They come to LA from Ohio, jump right into anal, DP's, etc., shoot a few scenes and then go back home.

I mean, Giovanna takes two dicks in her ass in her THIRD scene and then splits! What is their motivation expect they like to fuck and push their sexual limits? The bigger question is how can I find these type of girls myself?

shameless
Deactivated User

Moscow
1313 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 25 2003 : 11:44AM
Every girl doing this sort of thing in fron of the camera does want to earn some money, too. The only question is the price-policy behind certain acts.

Your bigger question: Offer them some money, too.

Tom
Member

833 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 25 2003 : 12:47PM
Lets look at that. I'm a stripper in Podunk, Kansas who has been watching porn. I want to explore and push my sexuality by performing a double ass penetration. I also want to make some money. So I go out to LA, get an agent and shoot a DAP with Jon Dough and some other dude on camera for the whole world to see for ever and ever...OR.. I do the same DAP for some clients from the strip club and make the same money. I just don't see the money being a big part of the decision unless they're planning on staying around for awhile.

And shameless, are you saying I need to pay for it to get laid?

 
Sir Noel Plum
Senior Studmuffin

1001 Posts
2/03
Posted - Apr 25 2003 : 1:02PM
Tom

I really find it hard to believe all these girls are doing DAP for the love of the job or just to push their own sexual horizons - it just sounds far too good to be true.

Not all girls do porn just because they are sex loving nymphos but because they want to earn money. Not all girls like anal and, even for those that do, knowing you're going to get fucked in the ass by a couple of well hung guys every single time you go to work maybe isn't that appealing.

This is the crux of the issue as far as I'm concerned. Pinkincide lists some possible reasons but I would think for most it boils down to - 'do I have a relatively easy time of my working day or is each day going to be a potentially painful stressful challenge?'
If it's going to be the latter then it has to be worthwhile (although as some girls are much better as taking anal than others for them the premium can be set lower and it's still attractive.

Perhaps.
SNP.

Tom
Member

833 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 25 2003 : 1:32PM
Very good points Sir Noel. I want to tie this back into the main thread to keep the MODS from locking us. I am just a consumer so I really have no insight in the way porno girls and/or strippers think. I just can't believe that it's all about the money. For a teenager to say, "Gee, I'm not horny and I really don't have any burning desire to be fucked on camera but I think I'll take a trip out to California and get fucked in the ass for a couple grand" sounds improbable.

Sure there are many negative reasons why girls get into porn (drug addiction, pimp boyfriends, etc.) but I have to believe that the bottom line for a teen girl to get DAP'd is because she LIKES it. The money is the gravy. Ah well, what do I know.

futureofporn
Member

658 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 25 2003 : 11:54PM
shit, if I was a hot girl, I might do 4 DAP's twice a year just to pay for tuition or make a couple bucks. It doesnt have to be a career, more like a summer job.
Which movies has Giovanna done? I only saw a couple pics of her on anabolics website.
Tom
Member

833 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 26 2003 : 10:29AM
Unfortunately for us Giovanna fans she has only done three. All from Anabolic/Diabolic. Nasty Nymphos #35, Ass Cream Pies #2 and Un-Natural Sex #9. I hope that they maybe have one more scene in their vaults.

In NN #35 she says in her pre-sex interview that she shot for somebody else before Ana/Dia. The interviewer asks if it was for the internet and she said no. So maybe there is some more Giovanna stuff out there not yet released.

Forgot to mention that after running a Yahoo search on her a while back (just for the hell of it) I found she is on a foot fetish website.

Edited by - Tom on 4/26/2003 12:43:50 PM

Porn Scout
Deactivated User

3735 Posts
10/02
Posted - Apr 26 2003 : 6:10PM
I'm a little bit behind on this thread but I'm happy to see it's getting lots of interest as this subject in general is a major gripe of mine. You are correct in pointing out the above starlets that do indeed take it in the ass. However, not all of them did it when they did Bring Um Young, others are active in Eastern Europe (Nicky Reed and Sabina) which is a totally different thing, and some of them, in my opinion, are of the marginal variety. Then, of course, there are some exceptions such as Gauge, Shyla, and Monica Sweetheart.

Porn Scout
Deactivated User

3735 Posts
10/02
Posted - Apr 26 2003 : 6:30PM
My opinion on this subject is based largely on the idea that most of these girls, like 99%, are in it for the money. If you contrast the American porn industry with Europe, you see that in Europe it is much more common for girls to do anal right from the very beginning. I think that's because there just aren't as many opportunities for them to do non-anal scenes because 1) there isn't the obsession with "teen" themed titles and 2)producers are much more firm about what they want. My feeling is that if there were fewer of these teen movies being produced in the US, and producers here were more firm about wanting anal scenes, and at the same time were willing to pay well for it, it would become more of a regular thing for girls to do it almost from the beginning, as opposed to right now where it is kind of like this big barrier for new girls, a major turning point in their porn careers where they go from "new girls" to "porn whores". The bottom line is that there needs to be fewer overall opportunities for these girls to do non-anal scenes.
MLyons
Senior Member

1617 Posts
8/02
Posted - Apr 26 2003 : 8:53PM
::groan::

I love how a bunch of fans are posting to this thread and offering their own arm-chair theories and pretending that they know more about the delicate business of this business than the producers do. When what it really boils down to is that the anal that IS present in some-odd 80%-90% of todays porn simply isn't enough for you.

Geez you guys. Is there not enough anal out there already to satisfy you all?

I know I must sound like a broken record, but not all fans are quite as anally obsessive as some of you seem to be. I don't delude myself into thinking that the women in this business aren't doing what they do primarily for the money, but the very nature of real sexuality and chemistry in porn requires a bit more than money... it requires a comfort level... and an understanding of what will and won't work for a specific performer. The full spectrum of porn just simply can't confine itself to monetary motivations. Otherwise it runs the risk of turning into a completely mechanical series of acts that cease to have any meaning whatsoever--and lord knows we seem to have too much porn like that already. Like it or not, not every girl is, or should be into anal, no matter what amount of salary structure is concocted, and those girls that do get into it need some time to do so. That's just my two cents. You can't have your cake and eat it too... you can't expect that every scene will have anal sex, and at the same time that every girl will be (or even act like she's) into it (which seems also to be a primary requirement when watching porn for most fans).

I'm not averse to anal--not in the least, but I do have problems with taking potential heat and chemistry out of a scene simply because there's heavy financial pressure laid down to perform specific acts. It's a supremely delicate balancing act that many porn producers perform extremely well. I can't imagine that many of them appreciate this kind of know-it-all criticism of their methods largely from a bunch of very anally biased fans who really don't know the business on the inside. Just take a second to note how many industry people are participating in this thread....

I for one am going to leave the porn production and business practices to those who actually know what they're doing. Sometimes I feel that it's a wonder the producers listen to their fickle fans at all. It must be maddening for them at times.

Just a dissenting opinion. Lord knows, I don't know shit either. :)

Mike L.

DenverDon
Benevolent

Firmly Embedded in Depravity
5914 Posts
7/02
Posted - Apr 26 2003 : 9:15PM
And what about all the fans that enjoy anal scenes, and non-anal scenes? Are we cutting them out of the picture?

I like anal scenes, but I also like a lot of other type of scenes as well. I like the variety that is available in porn.

One act, and one act only, in every scene could lead to a certain degree of boredom.

DenverDon

futureofporn
Member

658 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 26 2003 : 9:17PM
I would definitely say that if a scene has anal that is a plus over a non-anal scene.
Speelie
Senior Member

Fort Collins, CO
1191 Posts
5/01
Posted - Apr 27 2003 : 1:46AM
I'm surprised at how many people still think that "anal = good" as if that were the only criteria. I'm with Mike and Don on this, I like to see girls getting buttfucked, but I also like some variety. And I really like to see the girls seeming to have a great, wonderful, orgasmic time. Some are able to appear (or actually be) this way while getting a dick in the ass, others simply can't.

Of course this issue boils down to personal taste in many cases. I realize that. So if you are happy with a girl who looks bored, distracted, or unhappy, but at least has a dick in her ass, then so be it. But my personal taste is for girls who have lust and passion in their eyes, and I follow the work of porn actors and directors who allow this to happen.

We also shouldn't forget that the sex ought to be fun for the guys as well. Many actors have reported that they prefer the feel of a pussy wrapping their cock to that of an anus. And when I look carefully at a DP, I understand what the actors mean when they say it usually requires uncomfortable contortions that kill the heat of a scene for them. It isn't something most people do for fun when having sex, which is why, for example, you'll rarely see DPs in the movies of Nacho and Toni Ribas. They are all about what is fun for both the girls and the guys, who together create an atmosphere of energy and excitement that can't be found in more conventional, highly directed porn. And again, I realize that what I just described is not to the taste of many viewers, but then again, I think there already is plenty that would be to the taste of those people (especially from A/D and RLD).

I'm sure some people are reading this and wondering, what the hell is he talking about? Porn is all fake, no one puts any effort into it, so if I'm going to watch crap product, at least I want to see some anal, even if the girl doesn't like it. If that IS how you feel, I would then suggest that you are watching the wrong movies. And if simply enjoy seeing anal, DP, DAP etc. above all else, I'll say again that, as Mike pointed out, there already exists plenty of porn with that. I think that in the long run, this thread is all about coming up with solutions to a problem that doesn't exist.

 
tricia_devereaux
Evil Angel DVD

Patience is a virtue, but who wants to be virtuous?
4283 Posts
4/00
Posted - Apr 27 2003 : 2:18PM
Wow, what a concept!

I'm with Mike, Don and Speelie on this one.
Although I love seeing anal scenes, I don't have to see an anal scene to get turned on. And I would never be able to get turned on watching an anal scene that looks like the girl isn't enjoying herself.

Money is a big factor, but I would personally never try to BRIBE a girl with more money to entice her to do more than she is comfortable with. However, if a girl gets into the scene and would tell me, hey, I'm cool with the anal, let's go for it. Awesome. She gets a BIG raise. And we all get to watch an incredible scene!

jewel denyle
Platinum X Pictures

769 Posts
4/03
Posted - Apr 27 2003 : 6:07PM
Well I hate to burst your bubble but all the girls you mentioned that are in the Anabolic movie are 21yrs of age to age 25 not one of them is a true teen sorry I've shot all of them and have their ages on file none of them started off as teens in the first place except Aurora about four years ago and when I first shot Jenna haze three years ago she was 19 and didn't do anal until about one year into the business. This is why most teen movies should be labeled pretend teens not real teens. They may look young but they can all go to a bar and get shit faced for the most part.
futureofporn
Member

658 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 27 2003 : 6:43PM
Im sorry, but I could really care less if a girl is only claiming to be a teen. Just because you are 21 and not 18, I dont care, it only matters to me how good you look. I would rather have a video with attractive girls, or girls doing anal, than a video with "real" teens who are unattractive or dont do anal. Dont get me wrong, I havent seen Teens Revealed and dont know how attractive the cast is, all im saying is that girls "pretending" to be teens does not bother me in the slightest.
My only point was that girls are more popular when they do anal, so you didnt burst my bubble. I dont care if they are really teens or not.
SyberScott
Senior Member

1462 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 27 2003 : 6:53PM
Deceptive advertising indeed Jewel

But a very common practice in the
Porno industry. When a girl says
she's 18 (usually with pigtails),
it's given she's probably actually
closer to 25. hehe

Laissez-faire!

All Porn Girls should do Anal (without condoms)!

Sir Noel Plum
Senior Studmuffin

1001 Posts
2/03
Posted - Apr 27 2003 : 7:08PM
FOP,

Do bear in mind the title of the thread is 'Why is anal not that popular for porn teens' and so the comments Jewel made are very relevent especially when people are giving evidence to the contrary based on girls who are 20+

My tastes coincide with yours here FOP, I'll take anal non-teens over non-anal teens anyday, but that's not really the question under discussion.

Porn Scout,
You make the porn industry sound like one giant anally obsessed cartel that breathes as one - as far as I'm aware it isn't and it isn't and it doesn't, so your goal is one that doesn't suit everybody and couldn't be contrived even if it did (IMHO).

SNP.

PS: I'd just generally like to add that I don't see the point of these MLyons inspired 'whats the point discussing this' comments. On these boards we discuss religion (without the Pope taking much notice I would have thought), politics (without world leaders altering their policies on our say so) and choice of pet (the kennel club is surely not holding its breath on the outcome). These boards are for discussion and if we all confine our posts solely to our own fields of expertise 90% of the posts would disappear (and 100% of mine )

kisses,
SNP.

Porn Scout
Deactivated User

3735 Posts
10/02
Posted - Apr 27 2003 : 8:16PM
I understand that some people don't necessarily like anal scenes, or that it isn't that big of a priority for them. I agree also that it's no fun if the girl doesn't look like she's having a good time and things such as chemistry and ability to interact with the camera are very important too. I agree that there should be variety. And lest you all think I am just way to obsessed with rectal penetration, I will have you know that there are a few non-anal scenes that I actually like. In fact, one of the very best scenes I have seen in the last year is with the young latina Daisy in Raincoater #2, which is completely non-anal. That scene completely blew me away. Of course, I would still like to see her take it up the butt, so maybe I am obsessed.
Murray Head
Member

263 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 27 2003 : 8:50PM
I agree,I would prefer most girls(at least the girls I seemed to be attracted to most often)to do anal and especially DP.I'm dying to see Malorie Marx,Courtney,etc.do DP's.To me there is nothing better.I still want to see more Stacy Carpenter DP's,Allison Whyte,etc.Although I realize it's also a matter of comfort.A woman has to prepare herself physically for anal and take into consideration what size of guy she's comfortable with(I'm sure it's easier to manage a bigger dick than a girl is used to in her pussy rather than her most likely inexperienced ass).So I would imagine it's much less of a hassle to do straight sex when they're working.
julesjordanvideo
JulesJordan.com

Professional Perverts
1003 Posts
9/01
Posted - Apr 27 2003 : 9:04PM
I know for a fact that all the girls in "Bring um Young" from anabolic are under age 20, they even show theyre real id's, i think they were one of the truly verifyable teen series, however because they stuck to 18 and 19 yr. olds, i beleive the series lacked alot of heat, because of inexperienced, brand new teens. I beleive in preserving the teen theme as much as possible, however i'm not willing to have a product suffer just to prove a point. My series, trained teens, has mostly real teens, however i have shot gauge and aurora in this series, I wanted to get this pairing, and I couldnt think of a better series to put it in, obviously they arent teens anymore, but unless someone told you otherwise, i'm sure they would pass. I dont beleive in having ridiculous "teens", (ie girls 23-30 with implants etc). this business is about fantasy, sure if a girl is 18 or 19 and can perform outstanding thats amazing I think we should preserve the fantasy for the fans, not "out" fake teens. Does it really matter to you guys if they are 18 or 19 or 20 or 21? I have found that most of the best "young" performers are 20, or 21 yrs old, there are exceptions like jenna haze, who did start her career with anal (in fact i think that is why she is so big today), stacy carpenter, malorie marx, cris taliana, taylor rain etc...all these girls are under 20, (a few not anymore).

I have to admit though, that there are some ridiculous "teen" series out there, with performers obviously over 18.

on another point, for most girls, teens included, if they are uncomfortble or unwilling to do anal, there is no amount of money you can pay to "get" them to do it. How good would it be anyway? Dont you wanna see a girl that is really into it?

I think it is great to be able to advertise 100% real teens, but damn, i know how long its taking me to put together trained teens 3, trying to make it with plenty of anal.

...and yes cris taliana really did just turn 18 when i shot her in flesh hunter 4....

Edited by - julesjordanvideo on 4/27/2003 9:13:34 PM

Edited by - julesjordanvideo on 4/27/2003 9:34:17 PM

masterp74
Deactivated User

30 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 27 2003 : 10:14PM
Good to see you here here Jules. I was looking at your site and was wondering if your going to start a webmaster program. Would be cool if you did.

Edited by - masterp74 on 4/27/2003 10:15:44 PM

Tom
Member

833 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 27 2003 : 10:16PM
Jees, is thing getting out of hand or what?

Hell now I've got Jewel D'Nyle and Jules Jordan disagreeing over my stupid little "Bring Um Young" list.

First, my original posts were to politely disagree with Porn Scout's observations about teenagers doing anal. I thought that the Anabolic teen series, where they print the ages on the box cover, would be a good place to quickly research ages. I even prefaced it by saying that I am assuming that they are the REAL ages. I never said they were legit and I wouldn't know anyway.

Second, To MLyons. I am not trying to start anything but I didn't know this site was only for porno producers and people in the industry. I thought it was also for consumers like me who watch and buy these products. My "arm-chair" opinions to Porno Scouts comments are as good as anybody's. Thanks to Sir Noel for supporting all posters and their opinions.

Third, I am not one of these ADT posters consumed with anal sex videos as your comments would tend to imply. As a matter of fact some of the girls getting me off lately are Charley Laine, Mandy Starr, Mandy Lee and Veronica Lace and I don't think you'll see them with a cock anywhere near their asses anytime soon.

Fourth, you are right that Tricia, Jewel, Jewels Jordan and other industry folks, who have been kind enough to post with us, sure as hell know what the story is, even if they can't agree either.

To MLyons, I apologize if my comments appear combative. I've vented and now re-thought my words. As far a Jenna Haze. I started seeing her in videos around the summer/fall of 2001. How long did Jewel say she's been shooting her? Didn't Jenna say in her Joey Silvera shoot that it was her first one??

Edited by - Tom on 4/27/2003 10:30:30 PM

Edited by - Tom on 4/27/2003 11:12:38 PM

 
MLyons
Senior Member

1617 Posts
8/02
Posted - Apr 27 2003 : 11:08PM
Whoa there, all...

Let's not start reacting against things I didn't say. My post was not directed to any specific person, at no time did I say that fan's opinions aren't welcome here (if that were the case I would have had to shut up long ago), and finally just so everyone is clear I was not speaking as a moderator in any way! :) I refuse to censor my thoughts about things just because I wear that hat.

I admit that I might have gone too far to suggest that it's silly to debate this topic when most of us really don't know what's behind the curtains in this business (although I didn't exactly say that), but hey.. we all have our faults, and I have some strong opinions about this (and other) topic(s) that can all too easily cloud my objectivity. I do apologize for that, but I still stand by my comments, and really, they're just my stupid comments. They weren't an attack. We're all friends here, I hope, and a little healthy, irrational subjectivity now and then never hurt anyone.

Mike L.

Edited by - MLyons on 4/27/2003 11:10:22 PM

Tom
Member

833 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 27 2003 : 11:21PM
I agree. We are all friends here. I just didn't want to be lumped into a category of poster who just dwells on the same thing over and over (we know who they are) or who is consumed by one type of sex act.

Well, maybe my dwelling on unknown newbies, Giovanna, my dislike of Angel and Ashley Long and my disgust for Ed Powers' post-prodution skills may lump me into that category after all.

For that matter, add my disgust of Ed's pre-production skills, his lighting and his pre-sex rap/interview of the babes as well.

Edited by - Tom on 4/27/2003 11:30:26 PM

futureofporn
Member

658 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 28 2003 : 12:10AM
Age is unimportant to me. Teens is just a buzz word the industry uses to sell videos. I would much rather watch Trained Teens, even if they are not all teens, than a video with stricly girls under 20, just because its rare or "taboo" or something. Besides, the word teen is more of a mindset than an age in porno.
shameless
Deactivated User

Moscow
1313 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 28 2003 : 2:28PM
This is the initial question I wanted to raise, SNP. This question related to teens. Now having started this tread I am glad it has over 1000 hits already, which shows that the question raised is of interest to porn consumers, producers and actors alike. What I dont like is that it turned a bit into a <I dont like anal anyway> vs <I think pussy only is just too vanilla> argument again.

I dont like anal all the time, too. Watch that Barbarells-scene in Superfuckers 12, I already related to(reed Speelies review about it!), and tell me: Do you really want to see such an act on a girl who is that obviousely at pain and not into it at all? BUT that is not the question. And besides everybody tries everything once for the first time.
So the question is, WHEN is this first time. And WHY is it so late.

If youlisten to Jewel it is easy to say why: Jewel boasts about to be one of the only directors to have real teens in their teeny series, and that fact alone lets her keep anal at second place, even she knows how popular it is.
Probabely it is like Porn Scout - who knows much more about porn production in West than me - says: <Teen> implies no anal; thus only solution is getting away from teen-fixation.

Frankly speaking, I dont care about <Teen>-label as well. I think it is silly label, I dont want girls in pigtails, school-skirts and barefoot, dressed like 12 year-olds. Seems Porn-Scout is right: <Teen> is American obsession.
But what I want is new faces, and new girls trying to do anal as soon as possible. Just trying. If they dont like it, thy shall leave it (see Barbarella-example above).
So: call it teen, call it something else, I just wonder why they dont try anal and I think it is because of price structure (actually payed only a bit more than pussy, I thin anal is very cheep this way for producers, too cheap!!!). And I dont want somebody like MyLyons telling us who discuss about act he does not like so much as others, we were just stupid people discussing about something we did not know. (Do you have porn-insider-knowledge test for us to pass ready, already, MyLyons? )

And just to end long post: Speelie, I dont think we discuss problem that does not really exist. If so, why than there is no single anal in PX <Teens Revealed>? I dont want watch anal all the time, but I would like to have possibility to watch it, if I feel like watching it. And if I dont like it, I just <FF> trough or even better skip to nexr dvd-chapter. Hope this makes sense.

So, to sum all up: Why is anal payed only a small percentage more than pussy only?

Sir Noel Plum
Senior Studmuffin

1001 Posts
2/03
Posted - Apr 28 2003 : 3:03PM
Shameless,
I can only believe the actual reason is to do with the amount of available work for girls who do anal is that much greater.

There is a RLD film with Taylor Rain where the director comments that it is her 7th anal scene in as many days (or something like that). Now that's pretty serious assfucking especially given these guys are all well hung and penetration goes on for quite a while. Now, I don't know the exact pay structures of the people she had filmed for but why would she have 7 'difficult' days work if for only slightly less she could have 7 much easier days earnings (she must have been sore by the end of that week)? Could it be that if she didn't do anal she wouldn't have been able to secure so much work in such a short time?

Just a thought.
SNP.
joining Mike on the peace pipe.

Speelie
Senior Member

Fort Collins, CO
1191 Posts
5/01
Posted - Apr 28 2003 : 4:11PM
When I state that it is a problem that doesn't exist, I'm referring to what I conclude from my own viewing. I keep watching movie after movie shot in Budapest and Prague with 18 and 19 year olds doing anal. I see Lucy Lee do it, Vanessa/Romana, Polina, Agi, Janet, Kristina, Lara Stephens, Leila, Justina, Kelly, Alissa, Victoria (Rocco's Initiations 5), Sabrina Black, Lenka/Valentina Valli, and many others. I'm just listing some whom I am confident are under 20, others are 20-22 and look young. I think there may be less anal among young American actresses, but overall, anal doesn't seem that unpopular for young female porn performers.

I do like the Barbarella observation, she's one of a number of actresses (Vanessa/Nikolette, is another example) who tried anal for Woodman, and didn't like it, therefore not doing it in other movies.

shameless
Deactivated User

Moscow
1313 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 28 2003 : 4:21PM
Speelie,
I still wonder, how PX could shoot that <Teens Revealed>-movie without a single anal scene. And I am not suprised fans complained, either. Maybe it is only an American problem with teens or supposed teens not doing that much anal. Still, I thinjk something in the payment structure must be wrong a bit. But Budapest I believe would be better option for filming teen-movies.

Of Barbarella I know only that Superfuckers #12 scene, but it looks like a good decision of her not to do anal anymore. (It is a pity, she does not like it, though).

Besides: I liked your SF12-review very much.

Edited by - Shameless on 4/28/2003 4:22:58 PM

Murray Head
Member

263 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 28 2003 : 7:02PM
Amen to that brother!
Porn Scout
Deactivated User

3735 Posts
10/02
Posted - Apr 28 2003 : 10:45PM
I agree that it has to do with the payment structure. I see it basically as a systems issue. In the European market, anal is more or less mainstream whereas here, despite it's popularity, it is still seen as more extreme. At the same time you have these teen movies over here that new girls can do for a while for (I assume) decent enough money while figuring out if they are going to stay in porn. If they decide to stay, their decision will no doubt be influenced by how they feel about doing anal scenes and/or if they have a legit shot at a contract. It seems pretty evident that the girls that stay in the industry and remain free agents, that do not sign contracts, eventually have to do anal. There are some exceptions. August Night, to my knowledge, has not done an anal scene. However, she has not appeared in that many scenes lately either, so demand for her services has probably gone down quite a bit. Charmane Star, I believe, has done at least one anal scene, but it's been awhile and she certainly does not do it on a regular basis. Daisy, the young latina that I mentioned before, has not done it, but she is still somewhat new and I think she eventually will. I'm holding out hope anyway. Cassie Young is new and has not done it yet. I hope she will but I have a feeling she will be able to last awhile.

I characterized this as a problem earlier only in the context of the discussion at hand. I'm pretty sure that the industry as a whole doesn't recognize it as a problem or we'd hear more about it. Of course, if it was me making the porn production decisions, I would definitely think it's a problem. I'd be frustrated as hell by it. But maybe that's just me and maybe it's only because I'm obsessed with the idea hot women taking it in the ass.

pinkincide
Member

229 Posts
1/03
Posted - Apr 30 2003 : 4:30AM
The whole anal thing is simple supply and demand. Most of us guys can get laid reasonably often. Most of us occaisionally get a BJ if we jump through the right hoops. But I'll be the first to admit that ass fucking beautiful young girls isn't a common occurrence in my life. To tell the truth I prefer oral above anything in my real life, but when it comes to porn I want to see what I can't have.
jewel denyle
Platinum X Pictures

769 Posts
4/03
Posted - Apr 30 2003 : 1:45PM
Well I have to say some of the girls we shoot in teen movies are so new to the business it might be their first or second scene of their career and when we get them so new they have not started doing anal maybe except a small percentage. And when I shot Jenna Haze it was only one of her fist movies she was only in the business for a couple of weeks when I used her and it was on 09/11/00 I remember it well because that day really sucked. And I remeber being bummed out because only a few days later after I shot her she started anal and all I could think of is damn it would of been great to shove my stap on in her cute butt but oh well it happens girls could work with you one week then the next start doing anal it's a progression in porn most girls don't jump into it right away. And when you shoot some of their first scenes it's hard to get them analized. But we shoot tons on different series so everyone has something they will like.
jewel denyle
Platinum X Pictures

769 Posts
4/03
Posted - Apr 30 2003 : 1:49PM
You say anabolic is all teens I don't think so Belladonna is a year yonger then me not a teen sorry and Monica Sweetheart not a teen either unless they held on to a scene she did years ago whe she was a teen. Say what you want but anything can be made up it's porn and I have all the girls that they shot on file Shyla not a teen sorry!
aybesea
Senior Member

Caroline Cage - Hungarian Hottie!
1485 Posts
5/02
Posted - Apr 30 2003 : 2:07PM
Well this has certainly become a long and twisted thread. And I haven't chimed in since the second post, so let me give my two cents (just to muddy up the water a little more - or maybe just to throw a little gasoline on the fire ).

I've never been a fan of teen movies. First off, they generally aren't teens. Second, there is nothing that looks quite as silly as an adult porn star trying to dress and babble like a pre-pubescent school girl. I mean, in some ways this whole braids and school girl clothing on girls with AA tits is a little repulsive, so adding anal to the mix just doesn't really cut it in my book.

OTOH, seeing some new girls to the industry show up and shake things about is a really good event. I love it when new hotties start to show up on the scene. I remember when I first saw Shyla and Jenna and Austin and Taylor and... you get the point.

As far as anal goes, I don't find it to be a necessity... after all variety is the spice of life. I've ripped more than one movie in my reivews for taking a formulaic approach to a film. But, in all honesty, I frequently feel a little let down when I watch a scene with a hot little honey, particularly when the flic is from a studio known for lots of anal, and the girl doesn't get sodomized. I mean honestly... who among you has watched Krystal Steal in a Jules flic and hasn't felt at least a little perturbed that she didn't take it in the amazingly sweet bunghole of hers!

So, as I said in post #2 of this thread... Shameless, I like how you think!

Tom
Member

833 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 30 2003 : 2:25PM
Hi Jewel, thank you for your feedback. Would you be able to tell us what movies you shot with Jenna? After a little bit of research the earliest movies I can find with her are the "Morgan Sex Project" films. I would love to watch Jenna at her earliest. Thanks in advance!!
skronker
Notable Legendary Icon

Scopophiliac
9780 Posts
9/02
Posted - Apr 30 2003 : 2:28PM
Well, I've been watching RLD's Straight to the A #4 -- excellent DVD, with some exciting new girls (Courtney Devine .... oh sweet Jesus!!) and hardcore troupers like Brooke B and Mandy Bright (is she the new Sophie Evans?). And I get frustrated that it's an anal-only title! I know, that's the point ... but I found myself wanting to see the girls get the Full Monty. Really good one for RLD though: they know how to work the set ups and the tease, I only wish the scenes were not so formulaic in terms of the sex, and that some of the scenes ran a little longer. Well, there's always Joey Silvera for that.

julesjordanvideo
JulesJordan.com

Professional Perverts
1003 Posts
9/01
Posted - Apr 30 2003 : 3:05PM
Jewels movie with Jenna Haze is Babes in pornoland-teen babes 2 i think, i have this one, its real good with jenna,jewel and joel lawerence.

Shyla was 19 when she first got into the biz, but i think anabolic just put out one of her first scenes in bring um young #12. Shyla sure looks alot different these days...

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 763Why is anal not that popular for porn teens?

Previous topic: bald (shaven head) female pornstars?
Next topic: Movie ID
Page 1 of 2 Last



Jump To: