Cyberchicken
| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Walter Burns Legendary Quoter IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02 | A combination of circumstances lead me to question myself regarding my "loyalty" to porn stars over the years. There were threads started here and in rame concerning pornstars in their pre and post boobjob periods; girls "fattening up or out" (Jewel De Nyle and Tracey Adams come to mind); and then there is the fate of Christy Canyon in the poll held by Speedy. We all know how porn stars can change during their careers (just look at Kylie Ireland) and I wonder if these changes have an effect on their popularity or the relation to their devoted fans. This question really hit me when I was downloading some pictures of Shelbee Myne. I had forgotten that I really liked her when she started out, in flicks such as Butt Row Swallowed with the Girls of Hooker U. and Fresh Meat 5: Sweetness Turns to Filth . Some of the pictures I downloaded, reminded me of why I originally liked her very much. Check out these 2 pictures:
Compare these with how she looks now:
Is there anyone who likes her more now? I can't imagine this at all. I don't think this is just a question of the girls getting older or getting fake boobs or getting over exposed. I genuinely would like to find out if a make-over has an influence on a porn star's potential (of course it has, but how and why and when). Let me illustrate with another example. I have always liked Jeanette Littledove. In opposition to Shelbee Myne above, it didn't really matter how she looked. For instance, I really can't tell you if I like her more in this picture from 1985:
or in this picture from 1987:
Could you please give examples like these and explain why the change did (like Shelbee's did for me) or didn't (like Jeanette Littledove's didn't for me) have any effect on you. Topic Moved by - Bill on Dec 25 2002 [Link] |
| Cyberchicken Member 900 Posts 4/02 | Cyberchicken |
| T Mac Member 166 Posts 1/03 | |
| Druber Deactivated User 187 Posts 9/02 | What really counts for me is performance (does she still do the raincoater-friendly stuff I wanna see?) and presentation (i.e. your pic 1 with her being fucked in her pussy does not convince an anal-freak like me much). Presentation in fact can change a lot even in the same few casting months. Take Laura Angel for example: I just re-watched her scene in Please #4 (1999) and comparing how she is presented by Private in the same period, once again I realized the use of a good make-up artist behind the set. (I still did enjoy Lauras more natural look a lot in PLease#4 of course - how could I possibly not enjoy a Laura Angel dp...!) To sum up: To me its a lot more than age and boobjob that counts. And with still photographs I tend to be more picky than watching them actually performing. Druber |
| cubesnake Senior Member 3858 Posts 10/02 | This answer is to no one in particular. Porn (imho) is fantasy stuff for the viewer. He or she gets to They work their brains out to deliver what the audience (or at least what the producer/filmmaker A little more respect for people in general wouldn´t hurt too much would it ? cube |
| Druber Deactivated User 187 Posts 9/02 | Thanks for your concern, cubesnake. But the clue lays in your word fantasy, imho. Porn girls on dvd are pixelized electronically converted viewers fantasies. Sure its not real life and sure there are people/human beings behind those productions. But watching porn I simply do not care, how those girls feel doing that on set. Wanna hear it: Yes, I wanna watch well presented fuckmeat. I am not the one that falls in love with a porn girl. Instead I ask for performance and I am willing to pay for that, in oder to have my fantasy on dvd. If the performers can consequently pay off there bills, even better. Druber |
| Walter Burns Legendary Quoter IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02 | |
| Druber Deactivated User 187 Posts 9/02 |
I am also sorry to direct your post, which I found very interesting in a direction not intended by your post. Probabely I just got too upset by rame-PC-talk invading ADT, imho. Maybe the moderators can seperate this tread. Or I can try to start a seperate discussion. My appologies again! Druber |
| Walter Burns Legendary Quoter IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02 | |
| cubesnake Senior Member 3858 Posts 10/02 |
ok enough for now ... gotta go see ya cube Edited by - cubesnake on 1/15/2003 1:56:28 AM |
| Walter Burns Legendary Quoter IAFD, supporters of beastiality. Just say no. 7564 Posts 11/02 |
The only thing I wanted to know was this:
Druber anwsered this question, very predictably I might add. If she starts doing 'raincoater' stuff, he is happy. He may be very crude in giving his anwser, and I certainly don't agree with him on almost anything, but he did stay on topic. Please, don't get me wrong. I still believe that you made some very valid points and that you have every right to let your feelings about "this kinda ´no respect for people´ writing" known to the ADT forum, but please, don't say "I could have raised the points in any thread." If you feel so strong about all this, you should have started a new thread specifically devoted to that problem. Now, you have only succeeded in confusing me and possibly others, who might think that my question belongs to the "no respect for people" school of thought. Which I think it is not. End of rant. Edited later: I am sorry. You caught me on a bad day. I don't usually like flaming posters. In fact, I still don't like it now. Edited by - Walter Burns on 1/15/2003 1:45:49 PM |
| cubesnake Senior Member 3858 Posts 10/02 |
to your question: I think a lot of girls should have stayed with their natural looks. I don´t mean boobs in general ... some have bad boobjobs some have tatoos who are either bad or placed in a bad position. But that´s not really such a turn off for me. What bothers me more ...if she does a scene which i can not relate to or does sexual things i don´t consider erotic in any way ... thats a turn off. I can understand (at least i think i can understand the feeling of not feeling good in your own body) if a woman wants to have bigger boobs. For a little time (relative) it even may look good (if done right) but when it starts to look artifficial it´s too late to be sorry. Take a look at Chelsea Charms ... i wish i had a picture b4 her boobjob. she has a nice face but those boobs are way too much. cube Edited by - cubesnake on 1/15/2003 1:48:27 PM |
| Hardware All-Star Member Your other left 14595 Posts 3/02 | In answer to your original question, I find that women I especially like tend to leave the business before I get tired of them. However, I can give you a current example of an actress I no longer follow as closely as I used to: Jewel Valmont. After she went with Vivid she stopped performing anals. Of course, her marriage may have had some influence there. At any rate, since I have all these great older scenes of hers, and I can't count on her to perform anals in her new material, I do not automatically pick up everything she's in. I do still check her out on occasion. In addition, there have been times when an actress changed her appearance so drastically that I no longer found her attractive - but I'm not naming names. I will say that I agree with the general sentiment that most breast jobs are a complete waste, but I understand that they're practically a prerequisite for the dance circuit. "I knew a girl who liked the prong |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |