Emma Hix

[Tweet is no longer available]

[Tweet is no longer available]

[Tweet is no longer available]

[Link]

[Tweet is no longer available]

[Tweet is no longer available]

[Link]

[Tweet is no longer available]

[Tweet is no longer available]

[Link]

This industry has enough troubles with piracy and narrow minded conservatives who think women should not be allowed to express or profit from their sexuality. It really doesn't need this self-destructive behaviour from creepy idiots whose behaviour is used as the benchmark that anti-porn activists will measure everybody in the industry by.

[Link]

He has now apologized after hours of stubbornly doubling down and pretending not to be in the wrong. This surely amd hopefully leaves the seedy little tosser absolutely wide open to legal action.

[Link]

I have to say that while I wasn't surprised at this it certainly indicates how professional some parts of the business can be and how professional many of the models are. Emma Hix included. The fantasy of a porn set being a free-for-all may be just that, but I like hearing that many porn sets and porn stars treat this like a business. I certainly get that sense from many of the stars who post here at ADT. It isn't that I didn't think that many parts of the business are run like that - a business - it's just that I really didn't think about it at all. I'm actually glad to know this now.

This incident really shows how professional some parts of the business can be. It was a softcore shoot and the male dressed as a Leprechaun (the Irish in me doesn't appreciate that.) wasn't supposed to make physical contact with the models but he did - and without their consent.

I really hope that the industry can continue to move in the direction of being more professional. I hope that as women gain more momentum to stop this crap that the rest of our culture can accept the sex-positive message that these stars and these scenes can bring.

I know this is just shooting myself in the foot and opening myself up to attack, but when I read of the complaint, that the male (Jimmy Lifestyles) was only supposed to have his face close to Emma Hix's ass and not lick it, my first thought was a line from the Lord's Prayer: "Lead us not into temptation." As tempting as it must have been, Jimmy Lifestyles didn't meet the high standards set by his co-stars, Emma and Emma. Shame on him.

[Link]

Just so you know, the shoot in and of itself was actually a hardcore shoot, it's just that the section that Jimmy was involved in was supposed to be softcore. The call sheet is, more or less, what tells her what she's supposed to be doing that day (who she's having sex with and what acts are involved, primarily). Jimmy was supposed to do a softcore portion of the shoot as part of the intro before the hardcore portion, but he just decided on his own that he would make that portion not softcore without asking any of the actresses first.

[Link]

If he'd had the self awareness to apologize immediately and take the incident as a wake up call, he might have spared himself. Instead he let it get this far and then tried branding Emma a liar and attention seeker and released 'proof of innocence' that was actually proof of guilt.

[Link]

As far as the professionalism vs shadiness in the porn industry - I'm not sure it's different than any other industry except for the naked vulnerability aspect.

[Link]

So, to clarify I'm confused about who to believe because, OOH, she could be making it up, and OTOH, the guy could have done it. And; to reiterate, do allegations like this actually accomplish anything?

[Link]

[Tweet was not found]

[Tweet was not found]

[Link]

How 'could' she be making false claims when the man she is accusing has apologised for it? There is no OTOH here. This is like one of those detective shows where they tell you the killer straight away, and you still haven't worked it out.

-

[Link]

[Tweet is no longer available]

[Link]