Reviewers Recommend Lesbian Trainer 4 (Sweetheart Video) - review by Captain Jack Director: Mike Quasar Starring: Serene Siren, Desiree Dulce, Blake Blossom, Kate Dalia, Gal Ritchie, Addison Vodka, Cami Strella, Taylor Wild. Read review
Of the 839 names I checked on January 1 and 2, 348 (41.5%) had changes in their partner counts from early October.
IAFD had 723 as having 90 or more male partners. That's 31 more than last quarter. We all can agree that IAFD isn't entirely accurate, but it's the best we have going. Any deviations from what I have are either due to timing, or, more likely, attributable to my error. Corrections and new names are welcome. A big thank you to those who supplied new names to add to the list in the October thread.
Jennifer White remains the only member of the 300 Club. The order of the Top Five changed with Anissa Kate jumping ahead of Nina Hartley into fourth place.
Julia Ann, however, joined the 200 Club after several quarters being stuck at 199. And we have 25 new names in the Century Club, whether they clawed their way in or had been left out previously.
OnlyFans performers Lily Phillips and Annie Knight, and maybe some others [edit: I just checked Houston's IAFD entry, and she's only got 47 partners identified; I'm going to guess that a few other "mainstream" performers who've done circus-act gangbangs have similar omissions], present a conundrum.
Phillips had sex with 101 guys in a 24-hour period and has done a 40-man bukkake, and Knight had sex with 600+ people (male and female) in a year. I doubt that IAFD will individually recognize all the participants in the former event or all the partners of the latter. And while there are probably plenty of performers who, if the truth were known, would be in the 600 Club, I don't know of any who've publicly acknowledged something like that. (Ellie Nova, in an interview early in her career, said she'd probably had more than 300 partners.)
Maybe a separate club is in order for performers with partner counts that would merit recognition but are unquantifiable, undocumented or unverifiable is in order?
Interestingly, OnlyFans are starting to get entries in the IAFD database. Check out Ariana Jolee. Her recent performances are all OnlyFans. Unfortunately, for the purposes of this project, it doesn't really help us, because on all the ones I checked, the male talent was not identified.
That happens with Ariana a lot!
Before Only Fans made it so easy to monetize sharing their proclivities, swingers made their own web sites.
From the original thread...
Also, in that thread, other known undercounts due to mostly to mega-gangbangs not really counting.(The numbers after the name were the known numbers back in 2022)
How do you go about finding these amateur outliers?
I have a similar question regarding lots of beautiful Eastern European girls who have their own websites or for whatever reason, haven't gone through the DDF/21Sectury/Legal Porno mill that most seem to. I'm curious as to how people are supposed to find them. Maybe through a site we can't mention here, where they post videos in an effort to draw traffic to their own sites? (That site, as well as some others, including BangBros, have elected to not make their services available in my state. I probably should get a VPN.)
But I digress. I'm aware of Wifey, Naughty Alysha and Jenny Jizz, all of whom I found on other sites I can't mention here, but I wasn't aware of any of the three you mentioned.
I started following Carol Cox in the late 90s - early 00s. Back then, I think if you searched for sex terms, her site was near the top of results. Same with Lisa Sparxxx. Creampie Cathy I learned about when searching for performers who do double pussy -- she does a lot of that. Cum Drinking Wife started showing up in ads someplace - probably related to searching for gangbangs.
I think that's the upside of amateurs having their own website -- searchability. I don't think search engines can peek into OnlyFans. That said, there's merit in that such content be more protected.
ADT user Panoramata posted yesterday about a performer I'd never heard of named Hotwife Lexi Love, so I looked her up on ADT, and checked out people she had done scenes with, and that's how I came across Sweet Vickie. A quick scroll down her page and I knew her number of cocks would be big, so I clicked over to the scene pairings tab and blammo! 123
I guess I'm not really up to speed on the hotwife/pro-am girls doing gangbangs on manyvids.
Most excellent work here by several posters. Thank you. Is there equivalent data on male performers and the number of women they've had scenes with ? I've tried a search or two. Generally men stay in porn longer than ladies so we expect higher numbers.
Most excellent work here by several posters. Thank you. Is there equivalent data on male performers and the number of women they've had scenes with ? I've tried a search or two. Generally men stay in porn longer than ladies so we expect higher numbers.
^ Back in 2017, Jeff from IAFD gave us the numbers for the most prolific men. Obviously the numbers are out of date now, but you can see that the men with the highest number of girls are in the thousands, not the hundreds.
edit: haha I just noticed that you asked the same question in the January 2024 thread, and I gave the same answer.
Anissa Kate jumps past India Summer into third place, but Summer, who has been dormant for quite a while, pulls even. Both are now tied at 286, two behind Sara Jay, who has unfucked someone this quarter.
And not counting those mentioned in this thread, when last I checked, we have six new Century Cub members.
One interesting lady Abigail Mac who is just beautiful has over 900 scenes but just 74 cocks as she does many g/g scenes . Wonder if she might join 100 club before retirement?
That's a good find. I keep thinking we've gotten all the "classic" stars, but every now and then we are still finding one to pop-up.
TallNick55> Abigail Mac who is just beautiful has over 900 scenes but just 74 cocks
Here are a few more high scene count -- but not on the 100+ list:
Sinn Sage 1644/11 Kenna James 969/94 (I'm sure she will be an addition soon) Eve Angel 899/25 Jessica Jaymes 852/92 (So close, but not likely to move up) Sophie Moon 850/24 Samantha Ryan 758/79 Mia Malkova 751/89 Sammy Rhodes 748/46 Lexi Sindel 725/25 Blue Angel 708/87 Puma Swede 708/93
[The scene count is the raw "performer credits" from IAFD, which is definitely flawed, but the best I've got.]
yeah scene check on iafd is not a good metric coz it will contain compilations... and you can't safely count out compilations either coz they may have a bonus scene that's not available elsewhere.
As someone who's looked high and low for B/G scenes for these two, I can attest without even going to IAFD, that most of their scenes involved playing for the other team. Unfortunately, G/G does nothing for me, so I regard their careers as a tremendous waste of beauty. :) Even more sadly, Eve's IR GB scene was a creampie-only affair. What a waste. Sigh.
Every now and then, I run across someone whose cocks/scenes ratio is greater than 1. I need to start noting those anomalies, especially the ones who did more than a one-week trip to LA that included a trip to Gangland or some other similar venue.
Lolly Dames started later in life and only 4 years ago. 221 scenes. So if she keeps filming at same rate she's in contention for a 200 cock rating in another 4 years
March's list is going to take a bit. IAFD has changed a lot, if not all, its performer URLs. Instead of using the name in the URL, the URLs now have a punch of characters. That's going to entail a new Google search for each performer rather than using the links that I have, then copying and pasting the new URL in addition to looking up the numbers. Unless one of you whizzes has something better. Uggh.
That's what we've both been using for a most of them.
Unfortunately, it's always been unreliable. It's a great first guess. But for example, Dee Williams is https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=darling_pc and Rachel Starr is https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=rachelstarr_07 (from performers changing names or having duplicate names).
It used to be that after you searched for a performer and opened their page, you could record whatever quirky name was used.
But that hasn't been the case for a while. For at least a year, when you land on a page, it resolves to use a UID. Like this: https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/id=65cfead5-3f2a-4082-a781-9a3733379e1c So, that's what I record now.
For me the old form with perfid still works as a link, but with newer performers especially, I frequently have to record the UID form.
That said, it's not always newer performers ... I just discovered Danielle Renae and https://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=daniellerenae works as expected.
I added a temporary column in the spreadsheet to search Google for the performer name + IAFD. I click on that link. The first result in the browser is almost always the one I want, and I'm where I'd be if my old links had worked. It seems easier than typing the names into IAFD, though I suppose I could build a direct link to IAFD search. But what I have now is working for me. The extra click takes virtually no time; it's copying and pasting the new URL that adds the most friction to the process.
I don't know why all my links don't work if yours do. Probably 15% do, using the performer name; the rest use a string of characters that resolves to the performer's page but are incomprehensible in and of themselves.
In an earlier version of this topic, someone asked about DPs. I determined that every performer above 150 partners had at least one DP, and most from 100 - 150 did. Of course DP means anal sex is already checked off in your current grand slam definition.
Your idea reminds me of those "purity tests" which were popular in college.
You could develop a porn-performer specific "purity test" so that you don't have to limit yourself to four items. Quantifying the acts would require a fair amount of research -- E.g., I don't think anyone has a definitive list of creampie recipients. And you'd need to define "gangbang" and probably other acts. (Is a blowbang a gangbang? (It isn't to me.) Is vaginal sex with one male plus oral with at least two others sufficient?) With a "purity test" like questionnaire, you might just bypass "gangbang" and ask more specific questions.... "had oral sex with three or more partners in one scene" "had vaginal sex with three or more partners in one scene". "had anal sex with three or more partners in one scene." "Performed airtight."
I've thought about this before, but not in terms of a "Grand Slam." Instead, I've thought of a "Hierarchy of Slutdom," or, on some days, "The Road to Slutdom" or "Descent to Slutdom."
I'm sure different people would disagree with a few placements, but mine would go something like this:
Nude tits only Nude bush Nude spread (Back in the Playboy days, the separation made sense; I'd go with combining all three in today's environment.)
Masturbation
Girl/girl
Blowjob Facial Swallow
Vaginal sex FMF MFM
Blowbang
Three+ guys, vaginal and mouth only Anal sex Three+ guys, all holes
DPP DAP TP
If you start considering IR, you get an even longer list. Does a brobang or a gangbang at Dogfart make a girl any more sluttier than a girl who does the same things but is more restrictive n her partners? To me, yeah. To some of the girls and a lot of guys here, it's no big deal. Shrug.
[Link]
studrams Deactivated User
409 Posts 7/16
Posted - Apr 23 2025 : 12:00AM
^ The separation definitely makes sense. From a model friend's perspective and going back to the days when my porn collection was magazines my order was this. bikini / lingerie topless implied nude, nude but you can't really see much full frontal nude, Playboy type pics spread, Penthouse type pics explicit spread to the point of holding her pussy open, Hustler and various European mags g/g or b/g but little or no touching touching to the point of a blowjob vaginal penetration the above with a cum shot Once a girl has done a scene with anal or two or more blokes l don't really differentiate as to what level of sluttiness she's achieved.
Indeed, but it's served is purpose. Maybe we should start a new one nonetheless. We'd probably just wind up with a bunch of buys arguing of whether a blowbang is sluttier than anal, etc. :)
[Link]
studrams Deactivated User
409 Posts 7/16
Posted - Apr 24 2025 : 2:06AM
^ Perhaps what an act returns in terms of remuneration might provide some objectivity. Producers are going more for girls to perform what they consider to be a more hardcore act.
Lesbian Trainer 4 (Sweetheart Video) - review by Captain Jack
Posted - Jan 3 2025 : 10:26AM
751/89