Party's Over, The - review by Sean DPS| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Gore Gore Girl Doctor of the Erotic Arts 7238 Posts 1/09 | So, I found this article in The Guardian (it seems they have decided porn is the hot topic of late...) about how anorexic girls are being targeted for an increasingly popular market for anorexia porn. I have never heard of this, it seems at odds with recent porn trends, and I want to assume this is BS. Does anyone watch this? Know about it? Is it really "popular"? [Link] |
| Zoid Senior Member Boobies and Anal 2004 Posts 5/04 | |
| closertothemeat Member 92 Posts 8/10 | Are images of naked anorexic girls 'increasingly popular'? I don't know. I doubt their popularity has changed (although these days I don't search often). |
| Dave_K99 Member 497 Posts 12/07 | The article makes it sound like there are whole adult modelling agencies specialising in dangerously underweight women, but I can't find any evidence of that. From what I can see there are just a handful of specialist 'skinny porn' sites, with a couple of producers caught trolling pro-anorexia forums looking for models. Here are all the pay sites I could find with a couple of Google searches and a look through a fetish porn directory: www.skinnyfans.com www.absoluteskinny.com www.thinfetish.com Really fucking disturbing, but based on that it's a smaller niche than necrophilia, or animal crushing, or any number of other strange fetishes. It's certainly far less popular than BBW/fat/feeder fetish porn. I don't see any evidence that anorexia porn is suddenly increasing in popularity and becoming even remotely mainstream. Of course that won't stop people trying to use it to stir up a moral panic about porn in general. |
| stinkfist Senior Member Subterfuge...... 7401 Posts 4/07 | |
| Gore Gore Girl Doctor of the Erotic Arts 7238 Posts 1/09 | Thanks Dave for the research -- it pretty much confirms what I suspected, but honestly I didn't think the sites that exist would actually be seriously anorexic women. I thought it would be kinda-skinny gals. Disturbing. |
| Pornication Member 130 Posts 1/10 | Compared to just five years ago, it's sad how malnourished and scrawny the girls have gotten. I've never felt a bigger disconnect with the women in porn as I do now. Most of them look nothing like the girls I'm attracted to or even see in real life. |
| Gore Gore Girl Doctor of the Erotic Arts 7238 Posts 1/09 | |
| Pornication Member 130 Posts 1/10 | The problem is porn has adopted the insane fashion industry mantra of "curves=fat". Size 0-2 is being pushed as the standard of beauty, and that means a lot of hot girls who are naturally size 6 or 8 are starving themselves trying to achieve "the right look". The common end result is the crackwhore appearance: sunken eyes, hollowed cheeks and skeletal figures. Look at the model list of any mainstream site and you'll see girl after girl who looks exactly like I just described. This was not the case until only 2-3 years ago. |
| lilmissmackenzeepierce Senior Member 1148 Posts 10/07 | "i live life with no regrets" |
| lilmissmackenzeepierce Senior Member 1148 Posts 10/07 | as for the girs 2-3 years ago being more curvy isnt true either i have been around for 4 years, and when i started i was considered "thick" being 5'6 and 120lbs im actually below my healthy weight if you look up the BMI charts online... finally at 23 i feel more secure in my body and love having curves(some surgically enhanced lol) being a woman entails curves.... but when i started there was a wealth of super tiny/skinny gals.... its been this way for a while... the funny thing is i am a size 2/4 even when i am not workin out or eatting healthy... however the camera adds LBS THIS IS NOT A JOKE.... so many times ive had fans at conventions and feature gigs say "wow, your alot smaller in person..." "i live life with no regrets" |
| celluloidferox Senior Member @EmperorCorndog 1438 Posts 1/10 | I also find the "anorexia fetish" to be appalling. It's one thing to be attracted to skinny girls, but it's another thing entirely to get off on seeing these girls starve themselves. It's really depraved actually. Then again, it's the really depraved content that people seem to flock to anymore. I don't know when porn stopped being about sex, and starting being about watching people destroy their bodies; but that certainly seems to be the case. |
| Guam Member 613 Posts 2/07 | Many girls I know have hipbones and visible ribs and that is their genetic build. They eat hardy meals and exercise it off or that is just their metabolism. A few of them, especially my ex-wife, are going to outlive us all and certainly are going to outlive the chubbies in fetish porn that no one seems to criticize. Americans are fat. Take a look at a healthy BMI chart. Some of these petite girls are well within their healthy ranges. A 5'1 girl who weighs 98 lbs is not underweight by a BMI chart. Slim girls have a more youthful, healthy appearance and that is why (many/most) men are attracted to them. It is a biological imperative -- survival of offspring, etc. Everyone can get in a group hug and bemoan skinniness, but that isn't going to change. And skinny, slim, thin, etc are all relative terms, by the way. I don't think anyone is talking about Aushwitz-y looking chicks here. |
| Guam Member 613 Posts 2/07 | I can only think of one or two way too skinny (by those site definitions) girls that have done hard core B/G, most just a scene or two. Cinderella, Asian Kitty, Powers had one named Mica that did another scene or two. Nessa Devil has been there and back. That is out of tens of thousands of hardcore porn actresses? Honestly, can anyone name any others? Hardly a big problem in hardcore porn. No more than the percentage of the population. Edit: I thought of Marissa Mendoza...5'4" 90 according to IAFD, 10 lbs underweight according to BMI. Edited by - guam on 4/18/2011 1:47:08 PM |
| MeganHussey Member 10 Posts 4/11 | |
| Pornication Member 130 Posts 1/10 | Not that I expect you to be honest or objective about this. You're the same guy who said before that you like skinny women "just like the fashion industry does", apparently oblivious to the fact that those girls are meant to look like human coat hangers. People who share this boney fetish of yours are not able or willing to tell the difference between "naturally skinny" and "emaciated skinny" which is what girls look like when they aren't naturally a size-2 but starve themselves to look that way. And if I were you, I'd be careful mentioning evolution when justifying this nonsense. It's the hourglass figure (NOT the stick figures with rib bones sticking out everywhere) that men are wired to find attractive as it signals both health and fertility. Sick women don't get curves; they're usually rail thin. And the shapeless cylindrical figure of your average size-zero "hottie" is what a woman's body looks like BEFORE it reaches puberty! Face the facts dude, what you find attractive is not what the average, healthy woman in this or any other culture looks like. People like you have a fringe taste, but have found a clever way of target-recruitment by constantly playing the fat card, hoping to shame perfectly healthy women into conforming to your fetish. I can't blame you to be honest. |
| MrTibbs Member 372 Posts 7/09 | If anything, preferences have been trending towards bustier girls with bigger butts and mainstream porn studios and websites have been catering to that. I don't know how you can say that girls are significantly thinner on the whole than they were 5 years ago. |
| Pornication Member 130 Posts 1/10 | Here's just a sample from the first couple of pages of Brazzers' model list. One would have to be full of crap to not see how scrawny they are! Five years ago, they were few and far in between. Today, they are gradually becoming the "standard" in mainstream porn and they vastly outnumber the curvy models you speak of. In fact, a lot of those curvy girls end up looking more or less like these within a year of entering the industry. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Guam Member 613 Posts 2/07 | None of those women looked emaciated or unhealthy to me, and I'm sure all of them are well within their height/weight BMI calculation. The people taking your part of these debates are really focusing on the psychological impact of body image, not the actual physical health issue. It is much healthier to be 5 lbs below your BMI range than 5 above it. Any woman starving themselves to make it in pornography may have something beyond dietary concerns going on in her life. Edit: I just went through the first 100 Brazzers Models "Milfs and Big Busts" There isn't a girl in there I would even call "slim", never mind thin or, god forbid, skinny. Look, different horses for different courses. Some buddies of mine are into big breasts, and they don't care about the fat, unexercised caboose attached, and they will pay to get ridiculous bolt-ons put on to their wheezing, out-of-shape wives. And they think they married an angel, until she has a heart attack at 45 and diabetes at 55...and silicon poisonihg in between. And if they suggests they exercise, they are pedophiles hung up on tiny-hineys. And, PS, they all shun my wife, at 5'6", 105, who can out run and out eat and out drink all of them. Is that better than a skinny fetish? Maybe that "skinny fetish" in men helps keep some of those 5'5", 145lbers with dd bolt-ons another ten years of life through shame exercise. Edited by - guam on 4/18/2011 10:49:47 PM |
| Pornication Member 130 Posts 1/10 | |
| Gunzo Senior Member 1377 Posts 2/05 | |
| Pornication Member 130 Posts 1/10 | |
| closertothemeat Member 92 Posts 8/10 | |
| Pornication Member 130 Posts 1/10 | |
| killbillvol69 All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18631 Posts 4/08 | Smarten up folks, or I'm going to have to shut this thread down. |
| Gunzo Senior Member 1377 Posts 2/05 | |
| Pornication Member 130 Posts 1/10 | |
| killbillvol69 All-Star Member ^Lucy Pinder 18631 Posts 4/08 |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |