Perosnally the creampie is something that really makes porn better when it is included. I like seeing the women get blasted in the face and swallow but a creampie makes the porn seem alot more realistic for me. I don't like the 5 Guy Cream Pie series. Just something about a guy having sex with a woman right after she has already got another guy's seed in her just seems wrong to me.
Agree with you 100%. Facials are so over done, i'm bored with them, creampies are so erotic i always look at the back covers of DVD's now to see if they have them, theres so many places for a guy to shoot his load, camel toe, ass, stomach, back, tits, please Directors take note and give us some variety and more creampies!
I like creampies, at least sometimes. I find it odd that creampies are considered "circus tricks" by some reveiwers (I realize that part of that labelling is for when the cum is farted out and served to a girl with a spoon, or something similar). A creampie seems, to me, far more natural than having a guy pull out to ejaculate on a girl's face, or in his mouth. Those acts seem, to me, to be contrived. I'm not criticising any act here, there's room in porn for any and all sorts of ejaculatory fun!
if its cream pies your looking for then how about 6 scenes on 2 discs over 4 hours of cream pies from hell! chris' streams internal damnation. priva - Michael Stefano anal loona luxx - Manuel Ferrara anal Annette Schwartz - erik everhard - steve holmes DP Audrey Bitoni (first cream pie) Michael Stefano Rachel Roxxx (first cream pie) Manuel Ferrara kelly wells DP - Chelsie Rae DP - james deen - john strong - special guest slut Jaelyn Fox and her surprise. coming march 26 from jules jordan video
I care basically nothing for creampies. I think they're anticlimactic (As I do any cumshot that you can't see. It's porn. A visual medium) and have very little actual stroke value. Edited by - randomprecision on 3/10/2008 10:05:03 AM
Eric and I came at the same time in DP in both of Annette's holes. She drips out cum from both lovely fuck holes in a cocktail glass and than drinks it. I think that was very visual. Steve Holmes
pornography wasn't sex but fantasies of an impossibly hospitable world 12377 Posts 9/07
Posted - Mar 11 2008 : 4:16AM
I don't mind creampies when it is just internal ejaculation, but the follow up scenes of the cum dripping out of the pussy is just stupid. And since they are so unsafe, I can live without them.
I personally love the feeling of having someone come inside of me, letting it drip out, and continue to masturbate. It feels great, but I can't say I would do it with anyone besides my boyfriend on camera-we'll save that for my website. For me, it's a risk factor if I were to do it with another person they would have to get tested the day before (or two days) the scene. the fuck junkie ♠
More cream pies. Reality is that they are just as "safe" as any condomless scene. Just because the main load is shot outside the vagina doesn't mean its significantly safer. Pre-cum is just as dangerous.
I like creampies. Actually, I don't need to see the cum drip out. Actually, I don't get off on those cum dripping shots. I enjoy the intense, internal cum shot, orgasm. In that case, the performers could probably fake it, if they act well enough. That's my vote.
Getting some one tested two days before may still not make it safe, in the case of HIV, took this from wikipedia; HIV antibody tests are specifically designed for routine diagnostic testing of adults; these tests are inexpensive and extremely accurate. [edit] Window period Antibody tests may give false negative results during the window period, an interval of three weeks to six months between the time of HIV infection and the production of measurable antibodies to HIV (so-called seroconversion). Most people develop detectable antibodies approximately 30 days after infection, although some seroconvert later. The vast majority of people (99%) have detectable antibodies by three months after HIV infection; a six-month window is extremely rare with modern antibody testing.[3] During the window period, an infected person can transmit HIV to others although their HIV infection may not be detectable with an antibody test.
WOW sasha that is the hottest thing ive EVER read.No wonder you are one of my favorite stars it would be so cool if you did a movie and said that during the scene.Now I have to go pop in one of your movies into the dvd player.
that does sound pretty friggin hot... anyway, i wasn't all that in creampies when i first started watching porn, but it has grown on me over the years. i prefer seeing vag to anal creampies, and i'd rather not have the fake ones, but yeah, its great seeing her squat and ooze it out and lick it up or taking multiple shots.
I used to dislike the creampie because there was a huge flood of creampie films out at the same time last year or so. So it was overdone like the MILF obsession. Now, i am really into them lately. i think it is really hot when there is A LOT of cum gushing out.
I only watch creampie movies if the actress takes several creampies. Watching a girl squeeze out 5-10 cumshots from her ass or pussy is HOT! 1 on 1 creampies are usually lame.
Creampies can be either good or bad, and it all comes down to how they're performed. As mentioned before, porn is visual medium, and people want to see on screen the climax of the scene. However, cumming inside the girl is also a far more lustful act than merely cumming on her skin or in her mouth. So the obvious compromise is to cum inside her but show it leaking back out. And that's the problem. Since directors consider creampies without leakage to be a disaster, they ruin the scene trying to ensure they get the visual they want. First, to avoid doing what cums naturally -- cumming deep enough inside her so most of it stays put -- the guy does a laugh-out-loud attempt to cum inside her... but BARELY... I mean, sometimes you can see almost the entire head of his cock during the process of him "cumming inside her". That ruins it for me right there. What makes it worse is then the action stops like it hit a brick wall, as the guy scrambles to get out of frame, the cameraman does an extreme zoom-in on her pussy, and everyone involved is obviously PRAYING that a LARGE load will VERY SOON come running out of her pussy. You can just feel the tension in the room. And it sucks to watch. Creampies can however be quite good, particularly when it's the girl riding the guy in forward cowgirl, and she's working and grinding those pussy lips on his cock as you hear him grunt and let loose inside her, as she CONTINUES to grind, if the lighting is just right, you can see the underside of his cock pumping, pumping, pumping. As she thrusts against him you see his cock is getting covered in his own fluid. She bangs away some more at his hips you start to see clumps of white goo form around her pussy lips and slide down his cock. She keep riding his cock even as it starts to weaken and bend in the grip of her pussy, as the clumps of cum pile up on his balls. Her grinding slows and a tiny stream of milky fluid starts to flow in the gap left by his withering cock -- there's a pool of cum inside her. Finally, she lifts her pussy up off his cock, which falls limp against his hips, and from her gaping hole the pool floods out in a rush all over his cock and streams down his balls, followed by a drip-drip-drip-drip from her wide-open pussy lips. That's the way to do a creampie scene. Let the girl run the show, keep her on top, let her keep grinding on him and let gravity pool his cum at the bottom of her vagina, then let is spill out when she pulls off his cock.
I like creampies but not ones that are so mechanical. I like to see the guy hammer the girl flat out on her back and drop his 'descendents' deep in her hole and then I like to see it surface up out of her pussy reminding me of the opening credits in the original Beverly Hillbillies tv show "black gold, Texas Tea" bubbling up out of the ground. Remember that? In the old days accidental creampies were great, the guys would stroke the likes of ie Angel Cash power fucking her in a sandwich and nut inside of her ass & pussy much to her discernation. It was great to see the sperm running out of her alabaster toned body. She took creampies and hated it which made them all the more great. That's not done today, it's too planned and like I said mechanical. I'd like to see oral creampies done better too with some deepthroat and then close mouth finish. Anything less is 'just not civilized'.
"DEEP CREAMPIES, creampies the way they were meant to be, in the womb".
I checked out her site like you said. Running gag over there is that she's TRYING to get pregnant by black guys. If she does she won't know which one cause she's being inseminated by 'everybody'. But seems like just another genre in the making.
Hot bitches cum filled................. 59 Posts 2/08
Posted - Mar 16 2008 : 1:33PM
Provided all health concerns are addressed, it is my opinion that nothing says "dirty" more than creampies. It's a genre, it's gonzo porn so if a girl is willing to be creamed, the more loads the merrier. Everett said it "DEEP CREAMPIES, creampies the way they were meant to be, in the womb"
Shake for me girl... I wanna be your backdoorman ! 2776 Posts 10/07
Posted - Mar 16 2008 : 6:30PM
Wiseass struck a chord. [that's strangely strange to say] I like creampies but the wait and the execution is usually a downer. I remember a Billy Dee [I believe it was him] and Kelli Richards scene in which he was doing her anally and waited a little too long to pull out. Her butt spasmed and in doing so spewed cum everywhere. He continued to shoot and painted her asshole and butt cheeks white. I may be exaggerating the effect after lo these many years but that's the gist of it. I have seen other similar scenes where the guy creams the pussy inside and out and I think that is what a creampie should really look like. But WTF do I know ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SashaGrey wrote: I personally love the feeling of having someone come inside of me, letting it drip out, and continue to masturbate. It feels great... -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I agree completely! Guys, this may come as a surprise to you but other than the visual aspect, there is very little turn-on for us when you pop a load on our tits, belly or face. Nothing feels better than riding and having you partner big enough to "bottom out" and then feel the cock pulsate with each successive blast. Most women can feel the warmth of the jizz in her and believe me to be able to tighten up and milk each spasm out knowing your stimulating him to that extent is a great feeling. When I watch porn, I like to think of how it would feel if I was involved.
[Link]
Dither Persona non grata
I love America 650 Posts 8/05
Posted - Mar 17 2008 : 3:18PM
I like oral creampies but apart from that, meh, does nothing one way or the other. Then again, the traditional cumshot is pretty used up as well. As far as I'm concerned very few porn scenes have an interesting climax, it's mostly the same.
The modern Creampie era in porn is great in that it's an accepted genre. But I think the greatest era could've been in the 80s & early 90s in Peter North's prime. I will always consider it a lost opportunity that North wasn't paired up with the great ladies of that era for what could've been the most explosive & goopy creampies ever lensed. Think of North with Nina Hartley[:P)], Amber Lynn, Keisha, Tiffany Storm(recipient of the greatest North facial), Samantha Strong, Victoria Paris(I know, she didn't like the cum), Tori Welles, Shayla LaVeaux, Francesca Le & last but certainly not least Jewel DeNyle. Think about this lost opportunity and drop a tear.
Hot bitches cum filled................. 59 Posts 2/08
Posted - Mar 20 2008 : 2:18PM
Sweet thanks for the heads up Chris.
[Link]
Clam Digger Deactivated User
Many a man fails as an original thinker simply because his memory is too good. 2268 Posts 1/05
Posted - Mar 20 2008 : 3:27PM
My favorite! I was startled to see that it was referred to as a fetish on some board. After all it is how most couples (e.g were the pill is used) prefer it. I'm not saying that I need to see it squeezed out, however. I am not much for facials. Much more interested in the girl coming then the guy.
Perhaps ordinary creampies are not well suited for visually oriented porn movies. Because the viewer can't see how the guy ejaculates inside his lady. The main act is hidden from the viewer. And the viewer has to be satisfied with watching the girl expel her cum in order to show that it was all real. A visually more spectacular way to do it would be for the guy to cum just outside the lady's gaping asshole. And then he would use his cock to fuck that cum inside her asshole until she is 'clean'. And if his cock needs some cleaning afterwards. Then the lady can do that quite well with a spectacular, dirty-looking A2M on him. The viewer watching such a scene gets to see the most important and visually spectacular creampie action. And the only thing that ends up being hidden from him is the grossness of cum, which is a desirable thing to happen. Instead of grossing out the viewers by getting the girl to shit out that cum. Why not do it the other way around and make a show of hiding all that grossness of cum inside the lady's asshole to the viewer's delight? Watching such visually spectacular cum action would leave no doubt in any viewers mind whether the girl got an anal creampie or not. Instead of trying to persuade the viewers that the girl got a creampie by having her shit out that cum. Why not show it all in such an obvious way that no persuasion is needed?
I'm an oral cumshot fan, so obviously I hate them. However, if she scoops it up into her mouth...that's a different story. I feel as if this is not done enough or hardly at all.
[Link]
Dither Persona non grata
I love America 650 Posts 8/05
Posted - Mar 21 2008 : 9:55PM
I primarily like or prefer to see her finish him off somehow. The jerk-off douche is used up. Edited by - Dither on 3/21/2008 9:59:29 PM
I mostly agree with Dan on the merits of the "reverse-creampie" or whatever it should be called. Cum on the girl's hole and then use the guy's cock to pound the cum INTO her. It lets you see the cumshot and also enjoy the knowledge that the load ended up INSIDE her. This, in my opinion, is absolutely BETTER than cumming inside her and then showing everyone that as much of it as possible dripped OUT of her. What I like about the creampie concept is that the cum ends up inside her. I do differ from Dan, in that I would prefer the vaginal version of this rather than the anal version. Although the ultimate would be for the guy to first do the vaginal version and then do the anal version (or have a second guy do it). Another interesting variant would be to stick a FUNNEL deep into her pussy (or ass, if that's what gets you off) and then have several guys jerk into the funnel (or better yet have her jerk them off somehow, but that would be difficult for her to manage from that position).
I haven't been able to get online for a week or so and I just got to reading this thread again. All I have to say is thanks a hell of a lot Sasha. I just spit coffee all over my monitor after I read this, lol. Now if that is the hottest thing a woman could ever say then I don't know what is. I can see the dangers of letting a guy dump a load into you while on camera if he hasn't been tested. Just let me know where the line is at for testing for that scene if you are interested Sasha and I will gladly let them take out of me whatever the hell they want to to test. Just kidding of course Sasha.