Reviewers Recommend
Woodland WankersWoodland Wankers - review by fu_q
Starring: Danny D, Rossa Vaxx. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 517 > Cumfart Cocktails
AuthorPost
caviesxxx
Member

94 Posts
10/06
Posted - Apr 9 2007 : 5:38PM
Are there any plans for some future Cumfart Cocktails? If so, who will be in the next one? Also, are there any other series out there that has the same type of act?
Search Appliance
Member

112 Posts
12/06
Posted - Apr 10 2007 : 6:31AM
Don't hold your breath, now that Jake Malone has gone to Evil Angel with its regrettable attitude to creampies.

I hope a director at a more open-minded studio will pick up the baton. I'd guess RLD hold the trademark to the name "Cumfart Cocktails", since after Jake left they released "Be my bitch 2" which had been his series. I seem to remember that follow-up was mostly awful, which illustrates the problem: who's going to be able to do it like Jake did?

Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Apr 10 2007 : 9:20AM
Nobody wants another Darren James disaster and if it does happen I will blame a company like Jules Jordan.
Search Appliance
Member

112 Posts
12/06
Posted - Apr 10 2007 : 11:22AM
I see. You'll blame a company like JJV, not an irresponsible actor like Darren James. Actually, I don't really see.
Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14595 Posts
3/02
Posted - Apr 10 2007 : 12:13PM
No surprise there.
 
amneth
Member

91 Posts
9/05
Posted - Apr 10 2007 : 1:40PM
I'd like see Erik Everhard bring back Cum-filled Asshole Overload. I liked that title. I'd love to see him do one with Aubrey Adams.
Search Appliance
Member

112 Posts
12/06
Posted - Apr 10 2007 : 2:16PM
Or to put it another way: Suppose there is another Darren James disaster, except that the girl who goes down doesn't do creampies, so it was passed on just by vanilla anal. Who do you blame then?

It's a judgment call, where to draw the line. One view is that safety is the most important thing, and this leads you to porn with condoms. I don't agree with that, but I understand why someone takes that view.

Another view puts freedom first, and says "Let the girls and the consumer choose". This happens to be my view, and of course I think it's a sensible one :)

Then there are people in the middle, who say, "Well, I mean, OK, so let's draw the line in the middle, and allow some unsafe behaviors but not allow the highest risk behaviors". Well OK, but that doesn't seem to be based on any principle like the other two views are, and so it feels to me less rational. In fact, I can't help seeing some hypocrisy in this view: people who feel a bit guilty that the girls undergo some risk, but nonetheless their desire for money (industry people) or sexual gratification (consumers) won't let them follow that to its logical conclusion of condoms.

Hardware All-Star Supporter
All-Star Member

Your other left
14595 Posts
3/02
Posted - Apr 10 2007 : 3:25PM
One cannot live life without taking risks. That being said, if you go see your doctor what is it that she recommends? Lowering your risk of getting a disease, right? Suggesting it is irrational or hypocritical to apply the same idea to porn is... irrational?

I have nothing against condoms, per se, but the logical conclusion you are reaching for is monogamous porn.




Jump To: