Current status of 60fps in porn (a non-tech ?) | Porn Fan Community Forum

Reviewers Recommend

Housekeeper, The (Belessa Films)

Housekeeper, The (Belessa Films) - review by Danielmayu33216
Starring: Christian Clay, Agatha Vega. Read review

Participate...

log in
register

Browse...

Etiquette
Active Topics
Popular Topics
Member List
Search

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 399 > Current status of 60fps in porn (a non-tech ?)

Author	Post
BYOB_Kenobi Senior Member “Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.” - Kierkegaard 2684 Posts 8/09	Posted - Sep 29 2009 : 7:32PM The other day, I watched Barely Legal POV 4 in 60fps and thought it was mind blowing (there's nothing like watching Faye Reagan in 60fps)! You haven't seen a cowgirl scene until you see it in 60fps (for you ass lovers out there)! I think going from 30fps to 60fps adds a whole new dimension to porn, especially in the more dynamic scenes (but even in the less dynamic scenes). Unfortunately, I have found a limited selection of titles filmed in 60fps. My questions related to 60fps in porn Are porn producers moving towards releasing more porn in 60fps (either web or film content)? Typically, are porn films shot in 60fps or 30fps? Disregarding any potential cost factor, what do directors think of 60fps (i.e., aesthetic preference) [div] I really appreciate any help and insight regarding 60fps content. Thanks. [/div] Edited by - BYOB_Kenobi on Sep 29 2009 [Link]
UnkwnUsr2 Member 443 Posts 2/05	Posted - Sep 30 2009 : 12:19AM This is confusing to say the least. Nothing I've found anywhere indicates that the movie you mentioned (or any other movie, either mainstream or porn, I know of) is shot in 60 fps. All DVD video all over the world typically runs on 30 fps max which is the official specification for DVD video. While it's true that 60 fps video would produce a different, arguably better, video experience for certain types of content, it is usually disregarded because motion blur gives a good enough image and the cinematic feel when filming and producing in 30p. As if that wasn't enough, the content on barelylegal.com and the scene you mentioned is offered at 30fps. Wouldn't it be a waste to offer a lower quality download, considering authoring a 60 fps DVD would prove they have the necessary technical understanding? Are you sure about the video being 60 fps progressive scan or are you watching it on a CRT screen with interlacing? Edited by - unkwnusr2 on 9/30/2009 12:43:02 AM [Link]
BYOB_Kenobi Senior Member “Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.” - Kierkegaard 2684 Posts 8/09	Posted - Sep 30 2009 : 5:49PM UnkwnUsr2 wrote: This is confusing to say the least. Nothing I've found anywhere indicates that the movie you mentioned (or any other movie, either mainstream or porn, I know of) is shot in 60 fps. All DVD video all over the world typically runs on 30 fps max which is the official specification for DVD video. While it's true that 60 fps video would produce a different, arguably better, video experience for certain types of content, it is usually disregarded because motion blur gives a good enough image and the cinematic feel when filming and producing in 30p. As if that wasn't enough, the content on barelylegal.com and the scene you mentioned is offered at 30fps. Wouldn't it be a waste to offer a lower quality download, considering authoring a 60 fps DVD would prove they have the necessary technical understanding? Are you sure about the video being 60 fps progressive scan or are you watching it on a CRT screen with interlacing? Edited by - unkwnusr2 on 9/30/2009 12:43:02 AM Click to expand Thanks you might have clarified my problem as I was told it was in 60fps cause it was played on someone else's setup. I will have to look into it. I'm still ignorant to a lot of the whole new technologies (progressive scan & BluRay). I have to say, there was little motion artifact in it and lag was not as apparent as stuff I typically watch. Edited by - BYOB_Kenobi on 9/30/2009 5:51:02 PM [Link]
Zen Master 2007 Member 356 Posts 3/07	Posted - Sep 30 2009 : 6:34PM Regardless of release format or your system specifications, if the production in question was shot in one of the variant flavors of HD, 60fps (or 59.94fps) would be the native rate of image capture in most cases. You will also notice a visible difference in footage that was shot in interlaced mode (1080i) versus progressive scan mode (1080p). Hope this helps! - Zen Edited by - Zen Master 2007 on 9/30/2009 6:36:30 PM [Link]
Zen Master 2007 Member 356 Posts 3/07	Posted - Sep 30 2009 : 6:35PM Edited by - Zen Master 2007 on 9/30/2009 6:36:53 PM [Link]

BYOB_Kenobi Senior Member “Life can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.” - Kierkegaard 2684 Posts 8/09	Posted - Oct 8 2009 : 10:11AM ^ Very much so. Appreciate your assistance Edited by - BYOB_Kenobi on 10/8/2009 10:11:58 AM [Link]

All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 399Current status of 60fps in porn (a non-tech ?)

Previous topic: Girls offering guys better deals after cumming
Next topic: Looking for girls who make groan grunt sounds

Link to this post

Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post.

URL of this thread

Link to this post with HTML

Link to this post with Forum Code