Reviewers Recommend
Seductive Angie Craves Hot SexSeductive Angie Craves Hot Sex - review by Danielmayu33216
Starring: Milan Ponjevic, Angie Faith. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 691 > Digital-Sin/DDF Cheating
AuthorPost
nassi
Deactivated User


16 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jul 2 2004 : 11:03PM
im fed up totally with these New Sensations/Digital Sin -DDF Poductions..u see on the boxcovers great scenes of super hot anal action with a lot of gapes and more exciting preview stills and then in the mov itself u see almost nothing!! besides boring scenes who are usually warm up sequences ..it has happened so many times before with their porn movies and sometime its enough godamn!!

look here:
http://www.jadedvideo.com/yz_result.asp?PRODUCT_ID=97654

doesnt look the backcover charming and stimulating?..yeah then go watch the mov and u will recognize what i meant..they have cut out all the eye catching scenes..and this goes for all their movs! so better beware of this new sensations/digital sin-ddf shit !!

what are the trying to pull?

M.B.
Senior Member

1679 Posts
2/01
Posted - Jul 4 2004 : 11:04AM
I don't watch DS's DDF stuff, don't like the camera work or the picture quality. But I do like their US based series. My only complaint is that I noticed with their two most recent releases (I believe they are Big Cock Seductions #12 and Fuck Me In The Ass And Make Me Cum #2) that the time isn't marked for the chapters. All they have is one time mark that starts at zero, if you hit your "time/text" button on your remote, the display says "no time/text". So you can't find out how much time is left in a chapter or even the entire movie for that matter. The only info provided is the time elapsed from the start of thge movie, that's it. Not how much time is left in the movie or how much time is left in the chapter. I hate when studios do this, they already have the chapters marked, why not just add the time as well, it doesn't cost anything and it's annoying as hell when it's left out.
It shows a total lack of care in the product they put out.

Edited by - M.B. on 7/4/2004 11:05:42 AM

Speelie
Senior Member

Fort Collins, CO
1191 Posts
5/01
Posted - Jul 4 2004 : 12:54PM
The trick with the DDF stuff is that it wasn't shot for DVD. It was shot for short clips on their websites, and the movie footage was shot at basically the same time as tons of stills (the stills are, or at least were, the main content of the websites). So, when DS puts this material on DVD, they have massive quantities of stills from which to select cover shots, but a more limited array of movie footage, and all of it was shot more to look good in a sort of fashion photography sense than with eventualy DVD usage in mind.
nassi
Deactivated User

16 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jul 4 2004 : 12:55PM
ddf movs = deception
i wonder if someone is around here from DS/NS/DDf and can say something about this cheating but i doubt it....
annoying matter!!
Sbando Boy
Euro Babe Magnet

1839 Posts
6/01
Posted - Jul 4 2004 : 1:13PM
Speelie is right.
This has already been debated many times.
The stills from the NS/DDF dvds come from photoshoots (for which ddf is famous) and are not promotional stills from the dvd.
So, I don't think it's cheating, although I agree that it's misleading, at least for the casual customer.
But at this point people should have learned their lesson.
Other performers/producers (Clark, Rocco) keep on releasing boxcovers with promo material that is not in the actual movie, despite people's complaints.
 
Wally
Senior Member

1821 Posts
8/01
Posted - Jul 4 2004 : 5:09PM
that's why I always scrash my head when some people deem E/A as the best porn company around (?!?) ..oh, yes, ..now I remember why, they charge a premium for their dvds, that's why ...but, on topic now, what bothers me about NS/DDF videos is that seems to me like they cut the good nasty stuff out also. In a Lucy Lee photo-set I clearly saw Lucy taking a dpp but when they released the scene in one of the early Three For All dvds, there was no dpp to be found in the actual video. ..or the dpp was on pictures only and no even in their clips on the 1byday site neither? ..very confusing.
nassi
Deactivated User

16 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jul 4 2004 : 6:36PM
wally they always cut out the exciting scenes..
Coyote
Member

Daylight Savings Time, is it really Necessary?
972 Posts
3/04
Posted - Jul 4 2004 : 7:03PM
Hey welcome to the forums nassi! Digital Sin does have misleading covers but the newer releases haven't been that bad. Or at least the one's I've seen. One thing you have to remember is that Boxcovers have always been misleading. Nothing much has changed except some studios are doing better jobs at them. My big problem with DS/NS is that they don't have names of the performers on the chapter menu or in the special features.

And I really don't know how you could say that the Boxcovers show all this hot sex and then in the film there isn't any? I don't know because I usually don't look at the covers too much and if I do I know that things can be misleading. For example, Ass Wide Open 2's box cover (back) shows what's in the film so at least this is one film that isn't misleading

Sbando Boy
Euro Babe Magnet

1839 Posts
6/01
Posted - Jul 5 2004 : 3:50AM
There is nothing to cut, nassi.
Many times the dp's and dap's are only in the original pictures.
When you buy dvds made from websites content you should be aware of this possibility.
ze_dude33
Member

I love gapes and myself very much !
861 Posts
8/03
Posted - Jul 5 2004 : 5:29AM
I agree,for example ASS ANGEL 1 with Simony !!!!



Jump To: