It's a generic term, and with the little explanation beneath it, I think it works.
DenverDon
[Link]
Sweat Equity 5 - review by Captain Jack| Author | Post |
|---|---|
| Victor. Member London, UK. 38 Posts 12/02 |  Posted - Mar 7 2003 : 5:05PMDo we have to have this peculiar title ? Not everything's "digital" nor "smutty" in the Forum is it? Regards, [Link] |
| DenverDon Benevolent Firmly Embedded in Depravity 5914 Posts 7/02 | Posted - Mar 7 2003 : 5:10PM It's a generic term, and with the little explanation beneath it, I think it works. DenverDon [Link] |
| M.B. Senior Member 1679 Posts 2/01 | Posted - Mar 7 2003 : 5:53PM Having two categories that have similar themes doesn't make much sense. For example, in the "smut" category you have "general adult dvd" and in the "lighter side" you have "general erotica", what's up with that? It's the same thing isn't it? Also, placing "classics" along with "couples" makes no sense as not all classics are geared towards couples. And putting the "porn newcomer questions" in with the "lighter side" doesn't make much sense if they want to know about gonzo type action. It just seems like now I have to go to two separate forum pages for the same thing, where is before I only have to go to one. If you really want to change things up make these totally separate categories: classic Pretty much covers it all. [Link] |
| Drew Black broken crankshaft 8009 Posts 9/99 | Posted - Mar 7 2003 : 6:31PM These are meant to be rhetorical questions. I'm not looking for an answer. [Link] |
| MLyons Senior Member 1617 Posts 8/02 | Posted - Mar 7 2003 : 6:37PM Your points are well taken, but I don't think the point was to categorize at all. In fact, I vehemently disagree with doing too much categorization. It can take away alot of the intelligent conversation about porn in general. The point was to provide a sort of... sub-forum where people who are too intimidated to join in the conversations of the main forum can go. Hardcore porn vids will still be discussed there. Gonzo porn will still be discussed there. It's just that the emphasis will be a bit different. Admittedly it's a delicate balance, but I think even if we make a few mistakes in moderation, that the decision was a good one. Mike L. [Link] |
Flash  Golden Age Classic 11018 Posts 5/01 | Posted - Mar 7 2003 : 7:34PM [Link] |
| Saki At-Large 2087 Posts 11/99 | Posted - Mar 7 2003 : 7:40PM [Link] |
| Janitor Retired Porno movies, sexy videos, xxx. Adult DVD Talk at your service. 6409 Posts 11/99 | Posted - Mar 8 2003 : 1:22PM [Link] |
| Victor. Member London, UK. 38 Posts 12/02 | Posted - Mar 8 2003 : 8:59PM Having just switched on, I was very pleased to see the new title for this Forum. Kind regards and thank you. [Link] |
| Phil Thee G Member USA 77 Posts 4/02 | Posted - Mar 9 2003 : 12:55AM If I were to make a suggestion, is there a way to have stick threads for this forum like "monster facial alert" and "gapes to look our for" or "double anal" for those who base their rentals on such specific acts? Maybe a forum or thread for each individual component of raincoater type hardcore, i.e. each persons ton ten facials of all time, top ten swallows of all time, top ten gape movies of all time, etc... [Link] |
| DenverDon Benevolent Firmly Embedded in Depravity 5914 Posts 7/02 | Posted - Mar 9 2003 : 1:47AM Have a good nights sleep and a good cuppa coffee in the morning. Then perhaps the riff raff can just be others that are looking for a different genre of porn than you are. Please. DenverDon [Link] |
| Use the code below to link to this topic or a specific post. |
| URL of this thread |
| Link to this post with HTML |
| Link to this post with Forum Code |