The main difference in payment for a contract performer vs a non-contract performer is that a contract performer is given a specified amount of money to not work for other companies, and to do a specified number of scenes for the company holding the contract during a specified time frame. Such as: 20 movies, with no greater than 5 scenes per movie, in one year. (I'm totally making up the number here, it could be anything, this is just an example.) A contract performer is usually required to do other things besides perform in movies, too. They are usually required to represent the company they work for in media opportunities, industry expositions and other PR situations. Royalties are not usually part of the contract, although I have heard of a few cases. A contract is valuable to a performer mostly for the publicity. If you are under contract for a couple of years you will (usually) come out with a much more popular name than you went in with. That makes it easier to get work, and higher paying work, in the future. Also, some contract performers feel that by being under contract and knowing ahead of time just what they will be required to do and how much they will be earning, they can pursue other things in their lives without worrying about their next paycheck/scene.
It's amazing that performers don't get royalties IMO. I don't claim to have an intimate knowledge of the business side of the industry but I would think that any performer would want some of the money generated by their performance.
Wanting and getting are two different things. I'd love to get in the knickers of certain female posters. Doesn't mean that honour is coming to me any time soon.
Few performers' bargaining position is such that they can make such a demand. Also, not all of them may think long term enough to consider trading an immediate payout for royalties. And even if they did, would they consider the company honest and solid enough to trust them to pay those royalties later on? Would you?
As juha said: "In an unstable biz like porn only cash right now is for real."
In Christy Canyon's book, she said that she got $1 per tape sold, on top of her contract, when she was shooting for Canyon Video (the line that Video Exclusives owner, Mark Curtis, created when he signed her).
She also wrote that, at the same time, Ginger Lynn had a similar deal with Vivid.
I read that the ClubJenna Girls have it in their contracts that they receive a certain percentage of royalties when their videos surpass 10,000 copies sold...I also heard that that kind of contract was unprecedented.
I don't think it would be possible because with mainstream movies there are much much bigger audiences. It's not like a porn movie will reair on USA network on Comedy Central anytime soon.
If a girl is gonna sacrifice her body to the porn industry then she deserves at least a part of the proceeds from her effort. It's not about "want" per se, rather it's the reality for every other industry around. The only reason porn girls don't get paid accordingly is because they're looking for a quick buck.
Get a business plan already ladies...
There's a reason why top performers are paid more for what they do aside from how they perform in front of the camera.
In the music business, where artists are legally supposed to get royalties... there are millions of loopholes, accounting tricks, and outright thievery from record execs that keep them from ever seeing dime one of royalties....
entertainment industry in general is structured in weird way.