If it didn't matter, people wouldn't laugh.

[Link]

Basically the majority preference is: women like average sized penises. About ninety percent of men are between 5 and 7 inches in length; about ninety percent are between 4 and 6 inches in girth (circumference). If your penis is within these ranges, then you have a penis that most women are comfortable with.

Edited by - cv on 7/31/2005 6:17:14 PM

[Link]

But just go on any sex toy sales site and have a look 'round. See a lot of little dildos there? Me neither.

Of course, preference in dildos might not really imply anything about preferences in men's dicks among the general public. Maybe it only means that the subgroup of men and women who buy dildos find large size a selling point.

[Link]

That would make sense for lindi's dildo comment; the larger dildos are thicker. However, I'm thinking that of the eight inches, two or three inches are used as a handle.

[Link]

In support of Lost Horizon's theory, all the super-sized dildos I have owned were purchased for me by men.

[Link]

For what it's worth, if you are at least 5" and you know what you are doing, and can fuck long and hard, then I'd give it a shot.

[Link]

Too much about numbers. Just fuck and don't worry about it - if she'll let ya.

[Link]

6inches or less, or just leave it at home

I like them pee-wee sized down to "whisper light touch".

I own NO dildos or vibrators intended for inserting at all (other than those I use for shows). I have a little tiny pocket rocket and a little underwater silver bullet.

[Link]

It correlates with what Lindi said. Big tit videos and photos feed fantasies, but most people, at least those who are deeper than a puddle in the street, look at the whole package instead of a single part; and fantasies take up the slack.

[Link]

In some pussy is the place to be, always fucking is the life for me

FR

[Link]

I would guess most women are happy with average. While there are others who may live by the old addage.
"Bigger, is better."

[Link]

I was just watching a funky old movie, Sweet Movie with some non-porn dicks flopping around (looks like Sonny Bono or something), and they were amusing, but the big ones were yum.

[Link]

In personal life i prefer from 15cm till 20cm,just must working very very good.When i am shooting must bigger cause in the cameras the big dick is important.
Smaller cock cant hurt pussy.

Kisses,
Victoria

www.victoriaswinger.com

[Link]

removed page-breaking broken link address

Edited by - scipio on 8/5/2005 6:14:34 AM

[Link]

One thing which is never mentioned in these discussions is that not every woman is equipped with a company standard vagina, either. Adolescent boys (and maybe girls too) are told that "one size fits all," but my experience is that this is (almost but) not quite true. Some women have deeper vaginal canals than others; some women dilate much more easily with arousal and stimulation than others; some lubricate more heavily, etc. So why wouldn't women have quite varied preferences in cocks?

Having said this, I do think there is a lot of dishonesty on all sides about this question, both from salespeople trying to sell men placebos for size gains, and from "experts" trying to placate or lecture the public about what is "normal" and/or desirable for individual satisfaction.

Incidentally, since when does "the camera" need bigger penises? Dicks of all sizes have been captured quite perfectly for a century in pornographic films and videos, with no visual problems for the viewer. It's only in the last few years that there has been this mantra for a biped Seabiscuit in every sex film. Does this send a message that size equals satisfaction for nervous men and curious women? That I don't know, but Lindi's comment reminds me of something from my brief flirtation with public sex some twenty years ago: I discovered that if your cock met some mysterious but measurably specific size, you could be invited solo into many private and public swing clubs--to my knowledge, that was about the only way a man sans a female partner could walk into one of those places. Perhaps times haves changed on that score?

Edited by - lazerus on 8/5/2005 6:11:21 AM

[Link]

All through history, men and women have worshipped a biggun. Lots of phallic symbols and giant linghams, oversized phalluses being carried in parades, or painted onto frescoes.

Sure, even a mini-tampon will fill the receptacle, but it's not just about filling the receptacle. Big feels good.

[Link]

Dick size never matters to me. If I am connecting, REALLY connecting with a man, and if he feels the exact same way about me, then we're going to make heat together, no matter what. Love the man, love the penis.

[Link]

Sometimes it's better not to. That goes for abstaining, too.

Edited by - VincentVanGauge on 8/12/2005 12:11:49 AM

[Link]

Edited by - lou sapphire on 8/12/2005 12:38:45 AM

[Link]

Sure bigger can be more uncomfortable, but it's more satisfying and it's not just about the physical, it's about what goes on in your head too. A big cock doesn't have to be inside you to get you going!

[Link]

I prefer them hard. There, I admit it.

[Link]

Sometimes it's better not to. That goes for abstaining, too.

[Link]

As for the topic question, I'm more of a motion-in-the-ocean-than-size-of-the-ship girl myself. I'll work with anything.

[Link]

As probably mentioned in my toy reviews, I don't go for large toys (I've returned, refused to insert truly enormous ones), and don't use them much for insertion anyhow.

[Link]

The key similarity though is probably that women tend to think that men are more concerned with breast size than most men actually are and men tend to think that penis size is more important to women than actually it is to most women.

[Link]

Sometimes it's better not to. That goes for abstaining, too.

[Link]

Most pornos these days the guy is only fucking her with half his cock - the other half gives some distance between him and the girl so we can see what's going on, rather than just his hips slapping against her ass.

[Link]

To me, the prevalence of large penises in the industry today is just another figment of industry-standard male sexual utopia: where docile submissive females are cock-slaves to their horse-hung super-pimps. In this scheme, the supersized cock is the symbol of male mastery over the female. We choke them, slap them, screw them, and spew on them with it--all the while keeping them completely transfixed under its hot, pulsing aura. It's not a bad sexual fantasy, mind you; but after 5000 gonzo tapes where everyone plays the same parts you get a little bored with it, even if it warmed you up once upon a time. I also understand how the sheer novelty of a Mandingo or a John Holmes can create interest for male and female viewers; but the question here is about whether larger cocks are more functionally effective either in real sex or in shooting porn sex. Which is different from novelty or the psychological turn-on (if they can ever really be separated).

Perhaps the real question of this thread should be "how small is too small?" It's easy to tell Twilliams that his 6 incher (by the way, T--just shave that thing like you asked about; it'll make you look long as a garden hose) is plenty big enough for most girls, but what about the guy who is really only 3-4 inches erect? In purely functional terms, is this guy losing a lot of sensation during intercourse for himself and his female partner? Sex therapists seem to brush this question under the table, but a man with a very small erect penis could justifiably be said to be suffering from a form of sexual dysfunction, one that no blue pill can fix.

[Link]