If you honestly and sincerely think that a good blowjob is rivaled by an uncut man being able to jack off using his foreskin.... I'd say you need to go find yourself a decent woman. That's like comparing the differences between THROWING a bullet and SHOOTING a bullet. Cut or uncut, I'd love to see the show of hands from men who believe they'd rather play with themselves than get a good BJ. LOL....that's funny stuff.Depending on the thickness of your cock and the tightness of the pussy in question....this happens with both cut and uncut cocks equally.Agreed...no way for a cut man who was cut at birth to know how this feels. Also no way for an uncut man who retains their foreskin to know how sex feels for a cut man who has been this way all his life. Therefore....it's subjective and moot as a reference.Again...purely conjecture on your part. You are entitled to it, but no evidence exists to suggest that you are correct. Earlier in the thread, I posted a link that suggests just the opposite to be true....it doesn't make a difference to the man's sense of sexual pleasure. And as far as providing a woman sexual pleasure....totally subjective since it's doubtful any two men will perform exactly the same regardless of the presence or absence of foreskin.Not all. The largest study was done on a huge male population in Africa, comprised of non-Muslim and non-Christian men.Not sure that's the reason at all...but I'll grant that studies often are missing particular variables. In fact, almost all the pro-circ and pro-noncirc studies I've seen have been "loaded" to support their particular viewpoint. Bottom line.....believe what you want. Ultimately, life is about believing more in our own unique experiences than anything someone else tells us to be true. I don't believe circumcision matters one iota for overall sexual enjoyment and pleasure for a man. Your views, and others, may differ. But you can't convince me, nor I you, with factual evidence to support our positions. It's all conjecture and built on subjective observations.
Lets just say that there is still some controversy about whether circumcision reduces HIV infections or not. Here is a study which says that it does not prevent HIV infections: New Study Slams Male Circumcision As HIV Preventative As for my speculation about why many men like oral sex from the ladies nowadays. I was just guessing about why is that I have very little interest in such sex, while such sex is very popular among many other porn fans. It's just a guess on my part. And it's not even based on any strong facts. I only know that I'm not circumcised and oral sex from the lady doesn't appeal to me much. But whether other uncircumcised men feel the same way about oral sex from the lady or not, I have no idea. Perhaps you are right and I'm wrong in my guessing. But it would be interesting to know whether uncircumcised men in general feel different about oral sex from the lady than circumcised men feel, or not. Edited by - Dan on 11/13/2007 12:07:45 AM
I agree, that would be an interesting study. There would have to be several factors isolated, however: 1) Does a woman give oral to a cut male differently than an uncut male? And if so, how does this difference in technique impact "pleasure" for each respective male. 2) Do women prefer giving oral to cut versus uncut male, or vice versa, and does this interest in giving oral have any impact on the woman's ability to provide pleasure to each type of cock. 3) How would you measure "pleasure derived from oral" from cut versus uncut men? Is there a pleasure measurement system? 4) How would you factor in/out overall experiences for each type of man prior to the experiment. For someone, regardless of cut vs uncut, who had never experienced oral from a woman before, they may derive greater pleasure than someone who has received oral many times. Likewise....how do you factor in the overall attractiveness of the woman and whether or not she's using a "technique" that appeals to each participant in the survey? This would be a very fascinating study, but given the above issues inherent to not just that particular study, but the entire cut versus uncut debate in general, you can see how difficult it is to arrive at anything other than subjective measures. The impact on AIDS infection, or STD's in general, for cut versus uncut is at least a LITTLE easier to derive as you are measuring an external event (AIDS/STDs) versus a physical difference (Cut vs. Uncut). To measure something like pleasure, however.....very difficult if not impossible. There have been studies performed to do this (I linked one) but I'd hardly call them conclusive on either side of the debate.
I think that whole study in Africa should be changed to, showing those people how to properly and consistently use a damn condom. Something someone pointed outto me, if circumcision reduces transmission of HIV then why is the U.S. one of the highest rated places of HIV/AIDS in the world? I'm inclined to accept this because U.S. has WAY more cut ppl than uncut ppl.
You were given bad information. According to NationMaster, the number of people living with AIDS per capita in the USA is about 3 per 1000. This puts the USA ranking for living with AIDS at about 75th. This is lower than MANY other countries, including Russia, Spain, most of Central and South America, etc. The top countries for AIDS per capita are predominately in Africa. Statistics here.
Usually a study seeks to answer one major question only. Investigating the factors you've described would require several studies, and not just one. The problem with investigating all the factors you've described is that these factors are based on an assumption that uncircumcised men get a significant amount of oral sex from their ladies. And that assumption is not necessarily true. It certainly is not true in my case. Because not having any interest in blow-job sex, I refuse it even when the lady offers it to me. I've never had any negative experiences with such sex that I can recall. And I've certainly seen plenty of people enjoy such sex in porn movies. My lack of interest in such sex probably has to do with the fact that I don't enjoy much the sensation I get from such sex. I have experienced oral sex from the lady a few times. And it was ok for giving me a good erection. But I also got a good erection when the lady simply handled me there with her hands and masturbated me through my foreskin. That actually felt better for me than oral sex from the lady. And this is most likely why oral sex from the lady doesn't interest me much now. Circumcised men don't have any foreskin. And handling from the lady there without any lubrication probably feels uncomfortable for them. But oral sex from the lady feels good for them because of the lubrication they get from the lady's saliva. And that's most likely why circumcised men prefer the lady's mouth and not her hand.
i have an uncut penis, I was wondering ladies, is the smell and taste really bad for you. Like I wash my penis all the time but it seems that I can't get rid of the smell, sometimes I feel embarrased about it.
Isn't America about the only place that does this for non religious reason nowadays? I'm uncut, and I was told by my dad that they didn't have me cut because it was cheaper. I have no clue what females around me think about it, but I would assume that they prefer cut, and that most of them have probably never seen one that is uncut. Edited by - glow99 on 9/17/2012 8:46:31 AM
Being uncut myself...married...and a swinger I can say that women who want to feel a rock hard cock in their mouth, pussy or asshole can give two shits less if there is skin that needs to be pulled back to expose the head or if the head is always exposed...keep it clean and nobody will say a thing to you about being cut or uncut.
Still wanking after all these years. 8082 Posts 10/00
Posted - Sep 18 2012 : 3:00AM
Dreaming of cut or uncut cocks.
[Link]
trout bum Deactivated User
"I'm Not Here To Suck My Own Cock!" 2145 Posts 5/10
Posted - Sep 18 2012 : 11:41AM
^ 36 hours and counting? That puts it about on Friday. Big celebration planned? For me... 24 hours give or take and counting. We are booked into a nice European-style hotel plus a romantic dinner. I guess I kind of jumped the gun we're not booked into that hotel until Thursday night. So ready!!!
Women of ADT: If you would be in the dark with a man for the first time and you do not touch his penis with your hand or your mouth, do you think that you could tell whether or not your man had foreskin just from sexual intercourse?
I knew a girl who had a boyfriend who underwent circumcision as an adult, so she had it in both states. She said it was "uglier" afterward, but didn't mention that it made any functional difference.
I personally like it when the man still has a foreskin. but it doesn't matter if it doesn't.
[Link]
rinat Deactivated User
3 Posts 5/23
Posted - May 21 2023 : 4:41AM
I think they prefer one that can hold for a long time even if it is small. A big and wide one will be an advantage but less important And better not too big
Reading cut vs uncut threads is always funny. I will say though I feel bad for babies getting cut. As someone said in this thread if people waited until males could consent to such an operation there would be almost no circumcised men. Fortunately, it's mostly confined to just the US.
