Do you care if you favorite stars do kinky things?

Author	Post
CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11	Posted - Apr 17 2013 : 7:57PM A lot of messages on this board involve asking "When will my favorite porn star do some kinky sex act?" (Like anal, IR, DP, creampie, etc.) Obviously the people who post these messages care, but I'm wondering about the rest of us. Personally, I like BG porn, so if a girl only does lesbian, and I think she's hot, I want to see her take cock. But once a girl crosses this threshold, I don't care about anal, DP, creampies, IR, or any of that stuff. Don't get me wrong, I like kinky porn, and I love the girls who do hardcore performances with gusto. But if a girl doesn't do certain things, I don't feel like I'm missing out. I happen to like Jerk Off Encouragement (JOE). Most of this is solo work, and the girls usually don't even finger themselves. Even my favorite JOE girls don't need to work with a partner to please me. I suspect I'm part of a silent majority on this front, but I'm curious. [Link]
Draxxx Senior Member 3831 Posts 2/07	Posted - Apr 17 2013 : 8:44PM With me it all depends. There are girls in porn that I like that I think are so sexy or goodlooking I don't care if they ever do anal, IR, DP, rough or whatever. Tera Patrick and Jesse Jane are like that. In fact, when Tera started doing anal in her movies it didn't matter to me and it didn't really make the scenes more enjoyable for me. There are some girls that do start doing anal or whatever and it doesn't seem to make the things more exciting or the scene better. I'm a fan of Yurizan Beltran and was happy to hear she started doing anal...but after watching her do it a few times I could care less that she does it. On the other hand...I'm a fan of Chastity Lynn and when she started doig anal I became an even bigger fan. It's the same with IR. When some girls I like start doing IR I think it's great and with others there's something about it that makes me think "eh...". I guess if the performance isn't there or it just doesn't seem to click doing that stuff doesn't always mean it's better than not doing it. [Link]
hoochimama Deactivated User 1436 Posts 5/10	Posted - Apr 17 2013 : 9:39PM CummingLinguist wrote: Personally, I like BG porn, so if a girl only does lesbian, and I think she's hot, I want to see her take cock. But once a girl crosses this threshold, I don't care about anal, DP, creampies, IR, or any of that stuff. Click to expand To me the threshold is at anal, while I'll still enjoy seeing the gimmicks that come after anal(DP etc) they're not something I'll be yearning for nor be making noise about. ____________________________ Please ID these PlayboyTV girls https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/playboytv-foursome-identification-thread/ [Link]
JB_X Deactivated User addled 1500 Posts 10/12	Posted - Apr 17 2013 : 10:13PM I very much agree with you. How much I like certain girls in the business has nothing to do with what they are willing to do on camera. Some of my favorites do virtually everything (Chanel Preston, London Keyes, Remy LaCroix, and some of them don't (Kayden Kross, Katie St. Ives, Lia Lor). Then again, I prefer one on one scenes, either b/g or g/g. [Link]
MorganKane Senior Member 6037 Posts 10/10	Posted - Apr 17 2013 : 10:33PM I don't really care if my favorite stars do kinky things or not, How much I like the performers I like hasn't got anything to do with what they are or aren't willing to do on camera. While I like anal, DPs, blowbangs and kinkier things I'm not going to expect or demand my favorite girls to do any of these or anything they are not comfortable with doing. As long as they deliver a good performance it doesn't really matter whether it's anal, blowbangs, g/g or solo scenes. [Link]

JigglyBoobs Senior Member 1614 Posts 3/12	Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 2:51AM It doesn't bother me. It's just sad that some people think IR is "kinky". [Link]
Digmen1 Member 629 Posts 7/07	Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 3:17AM I expect my fave stars to do kinky things. But I get sad and upset when I see white, latin and asian girls with black guys. I don't mind seeing black girls with black guys. [Link]
Cody McLarge Senior Member 2668 Posts 8/10	Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 4:16AM I expect nothing. In fact, I don't care to see IR, multiple dicks, or hardcore BDSM. I get plenty of pleasure from watching good old fashioned fuckin'. [Link]
CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11	Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 6:11AM JigglyBoobs wrote: It doesn't bother me. It's just sad that some people think IR is "kinky". Click to expand Sadly, I have to admit that I furthered this perception. [Link]
Draxxx Senior Member 3831 Posts 2/07	Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 9:17AM ^ I think it's fine that IR be included on your list because for some people it is "kinky". The fact that some girls and fans feel so strongly about it makes it something that can be seen as "special" or "niche" or "kinky". particularly when the monster cock angle is played. [Link]
Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07	Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 9:39AM I think a lot of people are more fans of certain sex-acts than they are fans of individual women. There is only a limited number of sex-acts that a porn star can do. Once you've watched a porn star do them all, then watching her becomes repetitive and boring, because she is doing the same things that you've seen her do before. You need new women after a while to stay interested in porn. But you never get tired of watching the same sex-acts performed again and again, as long as you keep getting new women to perform them for you. Which means that people are more fans of sex-acts than they are of women. If you like anal and it's your favorite sex-act, then you never get tired of watching it, as long as new women keep doing it for you. But watching the same porn star you can get tired, after she has done everything and starts repeating what she has done before. [Link]
hoochimama Deactivated User 1436 Posts 5/10	Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 3:06PM ^Isn't that also the case for sex though? Married men do eventually get bored of the same meal day-in and day-out for years on end. Escorting clients don't usually repeat more than a couple of times when they have good alternatives. ____________________________ Please ID these PlayboyTV girls https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/playboytv-foursome-identification-thread/ Edited by - hoochimama on 4/18/2013 3:07:43 PM [Link]
H1gh Contra5t All-Star Member "My asshole just naturally opens up because that's what I want, I'm so horny for it" 8498 Posts 1/13	Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 5:27PM My favourite porn stars are my favourites because they look good fucking. I do not rely on them doing anything kinky or extreme other than straightforward vanilla fucking to get me off. I like to see them do it, or would wish them to do something kinky if they haven't already, but getting off does not depend on it. I have my faovurites because they look especially hotwhatever they are doing, and most porn stars you cannot say that about. That is why they are my favourites. I think a large part of it comes down to their natural beauty, but who knows really. To answer the question, no I do not particularly care. If they do, then WOOHOO! a bonus, but it does not affect how often I pull my trousers down. [Link]
Draxxx Senior Member 3831 Posts 2/07	Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 8:44PM Dan wrote: I think a lot of people are more fans of certain sex-acts than they are fans of individual women. There is only a limited number of sex-acts that a porn star can do. Once you've watched a porn star do them all, then watching her becomes repetitive and boring, because she is doing the same things that you've seen her do before. You need new women after a while to stay interested in porn. But you never get tired of watching the same sex-acts performed again and again, as long as you keep getting new women to perform them for you. Which means that people are more fans of sex-acts than they are of women. If you like anal and it's your favorite sex-act, then you never get tired of watching it, as long as new women keep doing it for you. But watching the same porn star you can get tired, after she has done everything and starts repeating what she has done before. Click to expand I agree that's how it seems with many porn fans. You can see it from the various threads here. With some fans it's amusing how whatever the girl does they always want to see her go to the next level. If she doesn't do anal those fans want to see anal from her, when she finally does it they start wanting anal with bigger guys, when the girl starts doing bigger guys they want to see DPs, when she starts doing DPs then they want a gangbangs, etc., etc... It also seems that boredom sets in very quickly for some and they need to see a constant cycle of new girls so they can start the "She needs to do {fill in the blank}..." cycle of demands again. The fans who always need to see the next new girl don't seem all that picky about the girl's looks as long as the girls does the sex acts they like. There's no right or wrong to what a person prefers but I'm one of the fans who is much more into the girl than the sex act. There are girls I never get tired of watching. They don't need to do kinky stuff to keep me interested as long as her partners, clothes and the senarios/set-ups change up from time to time I'm fine watching them regulary. [Link]
hoochimama Deactivated User 1436 Posts 5/10	Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 9:41PM Draxxx wrote: With some fans it's amusing how whatever the girl does they always want to see her go to the next level. Click to expand It might even be a fetish. ____________________________ Please ID these PlayboyTV girls https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/playboytv-foursome-identification-thread/ [Link]

realtip Deactivated User 2301 Posts 6/04	Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 11:16PM JigglyBoobs wrote: It's just sad that some people think IR is "kinky". Click to expand I agree that this is silly. But in porn, that's how it's treated. What's funny is when there are girls who do all the other "kinky" acts (anal, DP, gangbangs), but still don't do IR. Go figure. [Link]
mharris127 Senior Member 1844 Posts 8/09	Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 11:54PM I am shocked to see the loose definition of kinky used in this thread. Anal, DP, IR etc. is not traditionally thought of as kinky. In my world kinky involves bondage, caning, whipping, paddling, birching, stocks, suspension, etc. -- mainly BDSM. I suppose snuff scenes, shitting and pissing would be considered kinky as well but that is pushing the definition a bit. Maybe I have spent too much time at a dungeon and on BDSM sites over the past 40 years but anal and IR is definitely not what I would call kinky. [Link]
hoochimama Deactivated User 1436 Posts 5/10	Posted - Apr 19 2013 : 12:43AM "Gimmick" would likely be more appropriate. ____________________________ Please ID these PlayboyTV girls https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/playboytv-foursome-identification-thread/ [Link]
Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07	Posted - Apr 19 2013 : 9:10AM Draxxx wrote: With some fans it's amusing how whatever the girl does they always want to see her go to the next level. If she doesn't do anal those fans want to see anal from her, when she finally does it they start wanting anal with bigger guys, when the girl starts doing bigger guys they want to see DPs, when she starts doing DPs then they want a gangbangs, etc., etc... Click to expand Yes, when you see a sexy chick ride a really handsome dick, then you naturally start fantasizing about her being such a wanton whore that she will let you join in the fun with her. Because there is no way you can compete with her handsome guy, unless she opens up her ass and gives you and the other guy two holes to ride. Anal becomes important in this situation, because with only one hole to fuck, it doesn't make much sense for the pretty lady to take two guys at the same time. And it doesn't make much sense for the other guy to let you join in on the fun either. You need to see the lady have anal sex with her guy, because anal ladies usually let guys ride their pussies too. Anal ladies have two holes to ride, which makes your fantasy about joining in on the fun with an attractive anal lady very realistic indeed. Two fucking holes for two horny poles is a perfect match. In porn, you always see the lady have sex with another guy, which naturally leads you to anal fantasies about her if you want to join in on the fun with her. But not every viewer fantasizes about joining in on the fun. Some guys watch it like voyeurs, without any desire to join in, which makes a pussy-only-lady quite sufficient for them. The kind of sex you want to see for the lady depends a lot on whether you want to join in on the fun with her or just watch her from a distance without participating at all. And the way guys fantasize is probably a matter of habit for them. That's why some viewers want to see anal sex for every porn lady they like, while other viewers are satisfied with watching such ladies have pussy-only sex. For me, it has nothing to do with wanting to see the sexy lady go to the next level. I want to see her start with the anal level right away, without any delay. Because this is the only way I can realistically fantasize about sharing her with her fucking guy. I want to see the pussy-only lady go to the anal level not because it's the next level for her, but because it's the only level I'm comfortable with for every porn-lady I like. Edited by - Dan on 4/19/2013 10:23:16 AM [Link]
more_cowbell Member 162 Posts 2/12	Posted - Apr 19 2013 : 11:22AM Anal/IR is 90 percent of what I watch, so yes. [Link]
Draxxx Senior Member 3831 Posts 2/07	Posted - Apr 19 2013 : 8:44PM Dan wrote: Yes, when you see a sexy chick ride a really handsome dick, then you naturally start fantasizing about her being such a wanton whore that she will let you join in the fun with her. Because there is no way you can compete with her handsome guy, unless she opens up her ass and gives you and the other guy two holes to ride. In porn, you always see the lady have sex with another guy, which naturally leads you to anal fantasies about her if you want to join in on the fun with her. But not every viewer fantasizes about joining in on the fun. Some guys watch it like voyeurs, without any desire to join in, which makes a pussy-only-lady quite sufficient for them. Click to expand I find it hard to believe that the reason so many people like watching anal sex is because they fantasize about joining another guy bang the girl. Not saying that that type of thinking doesn't exist but I'm sure most guys who like anal fantasize about having the girl to himself. Why would the average guy want another dude in their fantasy? [Link]
Todd Gack Deactivated User "Oh, of course. Todd Gack." 849 Posts 6/12	Posted - Apr 19 2013 : 8:58PM ^^^ "handsome dick". Did I read that right??? [Link]
Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07	Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 8:13AM Draxxx wrote: I find it hard to believe that the reason so many people like watching anal sex is because they fantasize about joining another guy bang the girl. Not saying that that type of thinking doesn't exist but I'm sure most guys who like anal fantasize about having the girl to himself. Why would the average guy want another dude in their fantasy? Click to expand How can you blot out of your mind the porn-stud banging the sexy lady, when he is right there in front of you on screen? Such denial of reality is extremely hard to do. Only mentally ill people can successfully deny stark reality like this. It's not something healthy people can do. You can try to imagine that the lady will go for you later, after her fucking guy goes away. But if the guy is obviously more handsome and better in bed than you are, then your fantasy would be hard to believe and enjoy. Also trying to imagine something entirely different from what you are watching on screen is so mentally difficult to do that probably not many people can do it well. It's like trying to hold and juggle two different realities in your mind at the same time. Fantasies need to be believable to be enjoyable. And that's why you can't have a contradiction between what you see on screen and your fantasy based on it. It doesn't make much sense for the lady or the guy to invite another guy to join in, unless one guy isn't enough to satisfy the lady, and they need another guy to make it a good match. You need to have two holes for two poles to make it a good match. Anal ladies also do pussy-sex. They have two holes to ride. And that's why you need an anal lady to make your fantasy about joining in the fun realistic enough. Edited by - Dan on 4/20/2013 8:54:26 AM [Link]
LCF All-Star Member Non Prevalebunt! 10364 Posts 1/05	Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 8:58AM I'm perfectly fine with anything a favourite of mine wants to do, I am a huge fan of Chastity Lynn I was when she did just vaginal, I am when she does feature movies , I am when she does Lez , I was when she begun to do IR , I stayed when she begun to do anals and I bought today her first Bound Gangbang scene (Kink's DVDs are available in Europe) which depicts almost anything I hate in a movie (rape, violence and so , although obviously acted), but she's fine with it she did an incredible number of scenes for Kink and each time she moves the boundaries of it. So I say no I don't mind if a performer I like does anything she wants Edited by - LCF on 4/20/2013 9:00:03 AM [Link]
Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07	Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 9:14AM ^ When you like anything and everything your favorite porn star does, then this implies that you don't really care if she does kinky things or not. You are focused so much on the lady that anything she does is good enough for you. [Link]

hoochimama Deactivated User 1436 Posts 5/10	Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 10:07AM Todd Gack wrote: ^^^ "handsome dick". Did I read that right??? Click to expand I'm now convinced ADT is mostly trolls. LCF wrote: So I say no I don't mind if a performer I like does anything she wants Click to expand What if you saw her poopy porn? Or puppy porn? The various acts you describe, G/G, B/G, IR, anal, gangbangs etc are still only the girl having sex. The arbitrary distinctions between them being lost on most of those who aren't porn afficionados, let's keep some perspective. Dudes who would suddenly be turned off by a hardcore pornstar over such small details are most likely a tiny minority. ____________________________ Please ID these PlayboyTV girls https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/playboytv-foursome-identification-thread/ Edited by - hoochimama on 4/20/2013 10:23:57 AM [Link]
Draxxx Senior Member 3831 Posts 2/07	Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 10:24AM LCF wrote: I'm perfectly fine with anything a favourite of mine wants to do, I am a huge fan of Chastity Lynn I was when she did just vaginal, I am when she does feature movies , I am when she does Lez , I was when she begun to do IR , I stayed when she begun to do anals and I bought today her first Bound Gangbang scene (Kink's DVDs are available in Europe) which depicts almost anything I hate in a movie (rape, violence and so , although obviously acted), but she's fine with it she did an incredible number of scenes for Kink and each time she moves the boundaries of it. So I say no I don't mind if a performer I like does anything she wants Click to expand I'm a fan of Chastity's also and I like seeing her in almost everything except when she's playing "barely legal" and they push the little girl stuff too much. I also saw a Bound Gangbang she did that I didn't like because it looked like she didn't enjoy it but that was her playing the role more anything because she said she was into it in the post intereview. But it doesn't matter because I don't like seeing girls not into the sex (play acting or not). The funny thing about me being so into Chastity is I usually go for the fuller figure types. With performer like Chastity while I like seeing her go to the next level with her performances, I would still like her even if she didn't do the wilder stuff. I consider Chastity on of those performers who has a appeal and "it" that she doesn't need to do wild things to be entertaining to me. There are some girls who I think have to do the "kinky" or wild stuff just to make up for not having that type of appeal that makes you want to watch them regardless of what they do. What makes me a big fan of a particular girl falls into different catagories...I a fan of some girls because of their sexy looks, a fan of some because of their sexual performances, a fan of some because their body, and of some because they just look good being banged, and some girls I'm really into and can't explain why. Sometimes a girl will fall into multiple catagories and knock my socks off. [Link]
Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07	Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 11:22AM Todd Gack wrote: ^^^ "handsome dick". Did I read that right??? Click to expand The guy is handsome from the woman's point of view, and he is a dick from another guy's point of view. Because he is competition for you, the veiwer. Which is why I say that the guy is a handsome dick. The guy's handsomeness or dickiness is in the eye of the beholder, which includes the woman and you. There are two points of view, and both are important for any fantasy you might have about the woman. [Link]
LCF All-Star Member Non Prevalebunt! 10364 Posts 1/05	Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 11:41AM Draxxx wrote: I'm a fan of Chastity's also and I like seeing her in almost everything except when she's playing "barely legal" and they push the little girl stuff too much. I also saw a Bound Gangbang she did that I didn't like because it looked like she didn't enjoy it but that was her playing the role more anything because she said she was into it in the post intereview. But it doesn't matter because I don't like seeing girls not into the sex (play acting or not). The funny thing about me being so into Chastity is I usually go for the fuller figure types. Click to expand Well I feel exactly the same about Chastity in her Barely Legal stuff , about the bound gang bang , I'm not a member of Kink , I usually don't like BDSM , but Chastity said more than once that she enjoys such things, she likes to be dominated , that is why her scenes are so great. I'm not a twitter follower but sometimes I try to get some info when a performer I like is less active and she said some time ago that she was enjoyng anal sex more and more, back then she was a no anal performer and just did one anal scene with her boyfriend , but she was telling the truth , because she begun to perform anals with him then with other people (her first non BF was Sean Michaels) then for Jay Sin then getting anally fisted for Kink ( from the preview I saw she did a scene with a champ like Roxy Raye) and then getting Mandingo Balls Deep , she is an anal queen now, and I like her as such [Link]
Dread Senior Member Latex and boobs 5085 Posts 3/07	Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 6:07PM As long as the woman doing porn that I like is doing men then I'm fine. Anal and bondage and my other kinks are just bonuses in the long run. Though I watch gg porn sometimes in my bdsm scenes if a girl goes straight gg I'll no longer watch unless she pops up on one of kinks or other bdsm websites. ----Dread---- [Link]
Draxxx Senior Member 3831 Posts 2/07	Posted - Apr 21 2013 : 12:42AM LCF wrote: Well I feel exactly the same about Chastity in her Barely Legal stuff , about the bound gang bang , I'm not a member of Kink , I usually don't like BDSM , but Chastity said more than once that she enjoys such things, she likes to be dominated , that is why her scenes are so great. Click to expand I think she's done several scenes for KINK.COM and I think other than the one I actually saw the whole way through the others I only saw previews of and they didn't look as "rough" as the one I watched. I don't mind the rough stuff up to a point. I'm not into hard slapping, choking and such and don't like when the girl ends up looking all msessed up like she was in a fight. But anyway, the other scenes she did for them lokk to be more to my liking. But....as a Chastity fan, while I like the more extreme stuff she does I can happily watch her do the more standard scene. I enjoyed her doing IR DP for WESTCOAST PRODUCIONS and I was very close to buying a DIGITAL PLAYGROUND DVD because she was in it doing a more vanilla type scene. [Link]
type23 Member 21 Posts 4/13	Posted - Apr 21 2013 : 8:37AM I really care. If a performer doesn't do kinky scene for sure she is not in my favorite list. craignez honte [Link]
Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07	Posted - Apr 22 2013 : 8:09AM ^ Yes, what you say is true for many other porn fans too. The original question of this discussion thread assumes that favorite porn ladies are favorite just because of their good looks. Which isn't true for many porn fans. Many porn fans are interested in specific sex acts, and they choose their favorite porn ladies only among those who do those sex acts regularly. It's not enough for a porn lady to be attractive. Because porn isn't just about posing and looking good. She also needs to be pretty good at performing the sex acts that you want to see, which vary from one porn fan to another. If the good-looking lady doesn't do anal, for example. Then there is no way she is going to be on the favorite list of an anal porn fan, no matter how good-looking she is. [Link]
jettyman Member No matter what size the tits are....play with them.... 732 Posts 12/08	Posted - Apr 22 2013 : 8:09AM I do like seeing my favorite girls I've seen in mainstream porn suddenly perform in some rougher edgy scenes, there something exciting seeing a girl ass spanked and breast slapped to motivate all parties in a sex scene. It's so much hotter too if she responds by fucking faster and harder without squealing or yelping, it looks like she's encouraged by the roughness. [Link]
LCF All-Star Member Non Prevalebunt! 10364 Posts 1/05	Posted - Apr 22 2013 : 4:29PM Of course none of you take into considerations that the most famous and considered pornstars are those of Wicked and Digital Playground , some of them highly praised even on this board , I mean the likes as Jesse Jane , or Kayden Kross , or Bibi Jones or Riley Steele or Stoya but you can add Savanna Samson , Jessica Drake , Tera Patrick, Janine and most famous of them all Jenna Jameson The kinkiest of them all might be considered Stoya who does anals often. But they are all very far from an average unknown to the casual consumers gonzo star There's no need to be kinky to get some stardom , think of Lexi Belle , she did just one anal maybe two in her whole career , yet she still is one of the best [Link]

bootymeister Senior Member Gravity as Curved Space: Bootymeister's Theory of General Relativity 1589 Posts 11/08	Posted - Apr 22 2013 : 5:46PM My current favorite active pornstar is Misty Stone. My previous favorite active pornstar is Marie Luv. Actually, perhaps every pornstar is kinky. I can not think of a pornstar who will not at least do facials. Relatively, Misty Stone is less kinky than most gonzo stars, although she does get most of her work in gonzo. Misty does not do anal, rim males, and only occasionally swallows. Marie Luv is one of the most kinky pornstars. If there is something Marie Luv has not done, it is becuase of lack of an opportunity. What they have in common, is that I love the their looks and their great ability to perform. If a pornstar can not consistently deliver an entertaining blow job on camera, then I can not put her my A-list. I constantly have to wonder 'why is she even in this business?'. Kinkiness and a broad repertoire matter if you need your favorite pornstar to be active. However, my A-list of active pornstars has everything I want to see covered, so I do not need any single pornstar to do everything I like. Edited by - bootymeister on 4/22/2013 6:07:50 PM [Link]
Todd Gack Deactivated User "Oh, of course. Todd Gack." 849 Posts 6/12	Posted - Apr 22 2013 : 7:25PM Considering the fact that not every white chick will bend over for black dick, I think it's pretty reasonable for black guys to want to see black studs take on the white ladies. Because when you see a black guy take the ass of a sexy white lass, then it's a pretty good sign that she is probably available for black guys in general. You can fantasize about her, without any fear of rejection from her. Fantasies work well only when they are consistent with the facts that you know. And if you know that the lady won't do black guys, then it's pretty hard to ignore this fact in your fantasies too. It intrudes into your fantasies and makes them less hot. [Link]
realtip Deactivated User 2301 Posts 6/04	Posted - Apr 22 2013 : 10:20PM ^I don't think that's true at all. I don't believe for a second that all these girls who don't IR haven't done it in their personal lives. Mostly all of them have. The only reason they don't do it on camera is due to the retarded porn industry politics that still view sex between black men and white women as some "kinky" taboo act, as if it's still the 19th-century. As long as the U.S. porn industry (and I specify U.S. because this problem doesn't exist in porn produced anywhere else outside of the U.S.) remains in the Jim Crow era and makes a big deal about race, then white female performers will continue to make excuses for not doing it on camera, even though they'll do it off-camera. If the porn industry treated black male performers with the same regard that it treats white male performers, then all this IR bullshit wouldn't even be an issue. Whenever I think of all of the stupid racial hang-ups that the porn industry still has, it just reminds me that porn isn't known for attracting the most intelligent people. [Link]
hardy83177 Member Katy Perry melted my popsicle. 243 Posts 5/10	Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 12:27AM It truly depends on the star. If she started in Feature porn, say, like Stormy Daniels, who is my favorite, and never went to the true wild gonzo stuff, NO I don't care. However, if it is a star, Phoenix Marie, whom is now my favorite ACTIVE star, then yeah, it is great she does some of the kinky stuff, would I like her any less if she DID NOT do it? No. Hope my answer helps! Thanks. [Link]
CummingLinguist All-Star Member 5908 Posts 11/11	Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 7:39AM Dan wrote: ^ ... The original question of this discussion thread assumes that favorite porn ladies are favorite just because of their good looks. Which isn't true for many porn fans. Many porn fans are interested in specific sex acts, and they choose their favorite porn ladies only among those who do those sex acts regularly. ... Click to expand I wasn't assuming that looks alone determine any fans "favorites". There are certainly high- and low-quality performers. For me, what makes a great performance is enthusiasm. Great performers enjoy performing. I personally think Gianna was a great performer. I am in the minority on this, but I didn't really enjoy her one anal performance in Big Wet Asses. From my couch, she didn't seem to enjoy herself as much as she did in other performances. (Like I said, I know I'm in the minority, but I'm using it to make a point.) On the other hand, I think she really enjoyed performing with black guys. In general, I don't care about IR, and I like anal. But in the case of Gianna, I would be much more likely to check out an IR scene than another anal scene (if it existed). I posed the question because so many fans nag their favorites to do particular acts. The way I look at it, if she wants to do it, she'll do it. If she doesn't want to, it probably won't be a great scene anyway. [Link]
Dan Senior Member 2056 Posts 6/07	Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 8:59AM ^ If you choose favorite ladies by their performance and not just by their looks. Then she can't be a favorite one, without performing the things that people want to see her do. I've said in this forum before that I'd love to see Natasha Nice have anal sex with guys. And I said this not because she was my favorite porn star but because she had the potential to become one, if she did the things that I wanted to see her do. It doesn't quite make sense to have performance as a condition for the lady being favorite, and then ask if you care about the performance of your favorite ladies or not. Obviously you care, or else she wouldn't be your favorite. [Link]
RandomPrecision Senior Member Enjoy! 8175 Posts 3/06	Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 11:52AM CummingLinguist wrote: A lot of messages on this board involve asking "When will my favorite porn star do some kinky sex act?" (Like anal, IR, DP, creampie, etc.) Click to expand I don't consider these things to be all that kinky. Kinky, to me, is things like spankings and bondage. But to answer the question, I do prefer that my favorites do things like anal and swallowing. I consider that to be basic porn. I would probably rather see the cutest girls sucking another girl's feet than doing DP or IR or creampies. [Link]
RandomPrecision Senior Member Enjoy! 8175 Posts 3/06	Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 12:20PM realtip wrote: ^I don't think that's true at all. I don't believe for a second that all these girls who don't IR haven't done it in their personal lives. Mostly all of them have. The only reason they don't do it on camera is due to the retarded porn industry politics that still view sex between black men and white women as some "kinky" taboo act, as if it's still the 19th-century. Click to expand Well, the plain fact is that if it is treated as kinky and taboo and the girl holds off on it, she still has something to sell when she stops getting hired for other things. I don't think it's political in most cases. It just makes it a nice niche where people can make more money. Porn is the worst place in the world for PC [Link]
H1gh Contra5t All-Star Member "My asshole just naturally opens up because that's what I want, I'm so horny for it" 8498 Posts 1/13	Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 8:00PM I had an interesting thought today and I am not sure what the answer is. Early on I said that my favourite porn stars are ones that I perceive to be most naturally beautiful and who look fantastic whatever they do on screen, however kinky or vanilla it may be. I still stick by that. But it occurred to me today that when I discover a new star who becomes a favourite, why is it I look for any and all anal scenes they have done first? It's definitely my favourite thing to see a porn star do but it does not define them as a favourite if they do it or not. Have I answered my own question or is there some paradox hidden in there somewhere? [Link]
Todd Gack Deactivated User "Oh, of course. Todd Gack." 849 Posts 6/12	Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 8:19PM If porn studs start behaving like real gentlemen with the pretty lady, then there won't be much of a fuck for porn fans to celebrate. Because guys will be too nice to nail the ass of their lass all the way to their balls. They won't DP her for fear of being ungentlemanly with her. And they might even lose their erection, if the pretty lady gives a dirty look in their direction. [Link]
realtip Deactivated User 2301 Posts 6/04	Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 8:31PM RandomPrecision wrote: Well, the plain fact is that if it is treated as kinky and taboo and the girl holds off on it, she still has something to sell when she stops getting hired for other things. I don't think it's political in most cases. It just makes it a nice niche where people can make more money. Click to expand When I think of things that are kinky, I think of particular sex acts (e.g., anal, DP, TP, double anal, pissing, rough sex, etc.), not of the people with whom one performs those acts. That's why calling IR "kinky" makes no sense to me. You're labelling it "kinky" just because of the people involved, not because of the actual act. It's also fucked up that IR has often become something to be held off from doing until a girl becomes less popular, and can't be hired for anything else. There are quite a few girls who do this now. They do kinky acts like all the ones mentioned above, but still haven't done IR. It would seem that they would be saving those acts for later in their career. What's with the whole idea that doing an airtight gangbang with five white guys and swallowing all their loads at the end is less "kinky" than doing a plain vanilla sex scene with one black guy? Where does this idea come from? Then, after she's been shot-out from doing every kinky act that's allowed to be done in porn, and decides to start doing easy vanilla scenes with black guys, are fans supposed to be satisfied because she finally decided that black male pornstars are now good enough to fuck her when nobody else wants her anymore? The whole idea of girls doing anal, DP, and gangbangs before they do regular IR scenes is just completely backwards. If the sex act is the same, then what difference does it make who it's with? The implication is that black men are somehow different from all other men, so much so that if she does the same thing with a black man that she does with a white man, then it's "kinky" just because she's doing it with a black man. That's just stupid. Edited by - realtip on 4/23/2013 8:35:37 PM [Link]
CRFlixxx Member 60 Posts 4/13	Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 11:42PM That's why I don't enjoy most mainstream features, too bland. They're all the same....Girl on boxcover has sex twice, maybe a lesbian scene, then two or three more scenes with girls I don't care about as much cause I got the vid for the girl on the cover. But the flip side is, if a girl winds up doing everything and doing it often, that also winds up boring because after a year or two you've pretty much seen her do everything and there's nothing left for her to do. I wish Sasha Grey was still around, but she did it right, did it all then left in her prime. Still, I'd rather have the latter than the former. At least you'd get a year of greatness vs a decade of meh. [Link]
realtip Deactivated User 2301 Posts 6/04	Posted - Apr 24 2013 : 1:14AM ^Jessie Rogers is another one who comes to mind. She came into porn at the age of 18. At the age of 19, she had already quit the business after doing anal, DP, DA, group scenes, rough sex, and IR, making her one of the most popular girls in porn. Within one year, she did everything that a lot of other girls take five or ten years to get around to doing, if they ever get around to it at all. By doing so, she apparently followed the old adage that says to leave them wanting more, which is exactly what she did. It's one thing for a pornstar to leave porn after doing it for years, and everyone is already tired of seeing her. But it's another thing entirely to come into the industry, make a huge splash, and then quickly turn around and leave at the height of her popularity, like Jessie did. Not only that, but she was also one of the sexiest girls in the industry, especially after she got her bigger boobs. Whereas a lot of female pornstars stay in the industry for years doing the same old boring scenes, and really need to just go home and quit already, she is one girl who I hope changes her mind and decides to return to the industry. [Link]
Danger Josh Member I've been in the Danger Zone! 385 Posts 4/13	Posted - Apr 24 2013 : 7:49PM I personally have a list of 25 pornstars that i usually jerk off to. The list has a lot of variation and includes girls that do Anal, DP, DPP, DAP, Gangbang, Swallow, Creampie and some just plain B/G. For me what matters is if the girls is hot and looks hot doing it. If see turns me on doing it then i will watch it. [Link]
LawrenceSingleton Member Pornosexual 52 Posts 6/09	Posted - Apr 24 2013 : 8:01PM CummingLinguist wrote: But if a girl doesn't do certain things, I don't feel like I'm missing out. Click to expand Me neither. Because if she doesn't do certain things(i.e. anal), then not only is she not one of my favorites; chances are, I'm barely even aware of her existence. There'll be no "When will X do anal" from me, because with rare exceptions, I simply don't watch non-anal scenes in the first place, and I don't bother learning the name of a performer until I see her in an anal scene. Also, even if someone does eventually do anal, that doesn't guarantee that she'll do it in a way that I actually like. So even in the event that a non-anal performer somehow makes it onto my radar, I'm ambivalent about the prospect of her "first anal". As for other firsts, I don't have any interest in DP/DAP/DPP, gangbangs, creampies, etc., so I don't care if a girl does or doesn't do them. [Link]
Reecie Member Mrs. Reecie 249 Posts 3/14	Posted - Jun 11 2016 : 12:48PM There are lots of kinky acts, but creampies and swallowing are important to me; and anal is my threshold. When a starlet does anal, it makes everything hotter. If Nyomi Banxxx is giving a handjob, for example, I'm thinking, "She'll take it up the ass AND swallow his load!" My favorites tend to have phat asses or thick lips, but the ones at the top of my list are also kinky. [Link]

Author

Post

CummingLinguist

All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11

Posted - Apr 17 2013 : 7:57PM

A lot of messages on this board involve asking "When will my favorite porn star do some kinky sex act?" (Like anal, IR, DP, creampie, etc.)
Obviously the people who post these messages care, but I'm wondering about the rest of us.
Personally, I like BG porn, so if a girl only does lesbian, and I think she's hot, I want to see her take cock. But once a girl crosses this threshold, I don't care about anal, DP, creampies, IR, or any of that stuff.
Don't get me wrong, I like kinky porn, and I love the girls who do hardcore performances with gusto. But if a girl doesn't do certain things, I don't feel like I'm missing out.
I happen to like Jerk Off Encouragement (JOE). Most of this is solo work, and the girls usually don't even finger themselves. Even my favorite JOE girls don't need to work with a partner to please me.
I suspect I'm part of a silent majority on this front, but I'm curious.

[Link]

Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07

Posted - Apr 17 2013 : 8:44PM

With me it all depends. There are girls in porn that I like that I think are so sexy or goodlooking I don't care if they ever do anal, IR, DP, rough or whatever. Tera Patrick and Jesse Jane are like that. In fact, when Tera started doing anal in her movies it didn't matter to me and it didn't really make the scenes more enjoyable for me. There are some girls that do start doing anal or whatever and it doesn't seem to make the things more exciting or the scene better. I'm a fan of Yurizan Beltran and was happy to hear she started doing anal...but after watching her do it a few times I could care less that she does it. On the other hand...I'm a fan of Chastity Lynn and when she started doig anal I became an even bigger fan. It's the same with IR. When some girls I like start doing IR I think it's great and with others there's something about it that makes me think "eh...".
I guess if the performance isn't there or it just doesn't seem to click doing that stuff doesn't always mean it's better than not doing it.

[Link]

hoochimama
Deactivated User

1436 Posts
5/10

Posted - Apr 17 2013 : 9:39PM

To me the threshold is at anal, while I'll still enjoy seeing the gimmicks that come after anal(DP etc) they're not something I'll be yearning for nor be making noise about.
____________________________
Please ID these PlayboyTV girls https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/playboytv-foursome-identification-thread/

[Link]

JB_X
Deactivated User

addled
1500 Posts
10/12

Posted - Apr 17 2013 : 10:13PM

I very much agree with you. How much I like certain girls in the business has nothing to do with what they are willing to do on camera. Some of my favorites do virtually everything (Chanel Preston, London Keyes, Remy LaCroix, and some of them don't (Kayden Kross, Katie St. Ives, Lia Lor). Then again, I prefer one on one scenes, either b/g or g/g.

[Link]

MorganKane
Senior Member

6037 Posts
10/10

Posted - Apr 17 2013 : 10:33PM

I don't really care if my favorite stars do kinky things or not, How much I like the performers I like hasn't got anything to do with what they are or aren't willing to do on camera.
While I like anal, DPs, blowbangs and kinkier things I'm not going to expect or demand my favorite girls to do any of these or anything they are not comfortable with doing.
As long as they deliver a good performance it doesn't really matter whether it's anal, blowbangs, g/g or solo scenes.

[Link]

JigglyBoobs
Senior Member

1614 Posts
3/12

Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 2:51AM

It doesn't bother me. It's just sad that some people think IR is "kinky".

[Link]

Digmen1
Member

629 Posts
7/07

Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 3:17AM

I expect my fave stars to do kinky things.
But I get sad and upset when I see white, latin and asian girls with black guys.
I don't mind seeing black girls with black guys.

[Link]

Cody McLarge
Senior Member

2668 Posts
8/10

Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 4:16AM

I expect nothing. In fact, I don't care to see IR, multiple dicks, or hardcore BDSM. I get plenty of pleasure from watching good old fashioned fuckin'.

[Link]

CummingLinguist

All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11

Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 6:11AM

Sadly, I have to admit that I furthered this perception.

[Link]

Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07

Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 9:17AM

^ I think it's fine that IR be included on your list because for some people it is "kinky". The fact that some girls and fans feel so strongly about it makes it something that can be seen as "special" or "niche" or "kinky". particularly when the monster cock angle is played.

[Link]

Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07

Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 9:39AM

I think a lot of people are more fans of certain sex-acts than they are fans of individual women.
There is only a limited number of sex-acts that a porn star can do. Once you've watched a porn star do them all, then watching her becomes repetitive and boring, because she is doing the same things that you've seen her do before.
You need new women after a while to stay interested in porn. But you never get tired of watching the same sex-acts performed again and again, as long as you keep getting new women to perform them for you. Which means that people are more fans of sex-acts than they are of women.
If you like anal and it's your favorite sex-act, then you never get tired of watching it, as long as new women keep doing it for you. But watching the same porn star you can get tired, after she has done everything and starts repeating what she has done before.

[Link]

hoochimama
Deactivated User

1436 Posts
5/10

Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 3:06PM

^Isn't that also the case for sex though? Married men do eventually get bored of the same meal day-in and day-out for years on end. Escorting clients don't usually repeat more than a couple of times when they have good alternatives.
____________________________
Please ID these PlayboyTV girls https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/playboytv-foursome-identification-thread/
Edited by - hoochimama on 4/18/2013 3:07:43 PM

[Link]

H1gh Contra5t

All-Star Member

"My asshole just naturally opens up because that's what I want, I'm so horny for it"
8498 Posts
1/13

Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 5:27PM

My favourite porn stars are my favourites because they look good fucking. I do not rely on them doing anything kinky or extreme other than straightforward vanilla fucking to get me off. I like to see them do it, or would wish them to do something kinky if they haven't already, but getting off does not depend on it. I have my faovurites because they look especially hotwhatever they are doing, and most porn stars you cannot say that about. That is why they are my favourites. I think a large part of it comes down to their natural beauty, but who knows really. To answer the question, no I do not particularly care. If they do, then WOOHOO! a bonus, but it does not affect how often I pull my trousers down.

[Link]

Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07

Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 8:44PM

Dan wrote:
I think a lot of people are more fans of certain sex-acts than they are fans of individual women.
There is only a limited number of sex-acts that a porn star can do. Once you've watched a porn star do them all, then watching her becomes repetitive and boring, because she is doing the same things that you've seen her do before.
You need new women after a while to stay interested in porn. But you never get tired of watching the same sex-acts performed again and again, as long as you keep getting new women to perform them for you. Which means that people are more fans of sex-acts than they are of women.
If you like anal and it's your favorite sex-act, then you never get tired of watching it, as long as new women keep doing it for you. But watching the same porn star you can get tired, after she has done everything and starts repeating what she has done before.
Click to expand

I agree that's how it seems with many porn fans. You can see it from the various threads here. With some fans it's amusing how whatever the girl does they always want to see her go to the next level. If she doesn't do anal those fans want to see anal from her, when she finally does it they start wanting anal with bigger guys, when the girl starts doing bigger guys they want to see DPs, when she starts doing DPs then they want a gangbangs, etc., etc...
It also seems that boredom sets in very quickly for some and they need to see a constant cycle of new girls so they can start the "She needs to do {fill in the blank}..." cycle of demands again. The fans who always need to see the next new girl don't seem all that picky about the girl's looks as long as the girls does the sex acts they like.
There's no right or wrong to what a person prefers but I'm one of the fans who is much more into the girl than the sex act. There are girls I never get tired of watching. They don't need to do kinky stuff to keep me interested as long as her partners, clothes and the senarios/set-ups change up from time to time I'm fine watching them regulary.

[Link]

hoochimama
Deactivated User

1436 Posts
5/10

Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 9:41PM

It might even be a fetish.
____________________________
Please ID these PlayboyTV girls https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/playboytv-foursome-identification-thread/

[Link]

realtip
Deactivated User

2301 Posts
6/04

Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 11:16PM

I agree that this is silly. But in porn, that's how it's treated. What's funny is when there are girls who do all the other "kinky" acts (anal, DP, gangbangs), but still don't do IR. Go figure.

[Link]

mharris127
Senior Member

1844 Posts
8/09

Posted - Apr 18 2013 : 11:54PM

I am shocked to see the loose definition of kinky used in this thread. Anal, DP, IR etc. is not traditionally thought of as kinky. In my world kinky involves bondage, caning, whipping, paddling, birching, stocks, suspension, etc. -- mainly BDSM. I suppose snuff scenes, shitting and pissing would be considered kinky as well but that is pushing the definition a bit. Maybe I have spent too much time at a dungeon and on BDSM sites over the past 40 years but anal and IR is definitely not what I would call kinky.

[Link]

hoochimama
Deactivated User

1436 Posts
5/10

Posted - Apr 19 2013 : 12:43AM

"Gimmick" would likely be more appropriate.
____________________________
Please ID these PlayboyTV girls https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/playboytv-foursome-identification-thread/

[Link]

Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07

Posted - Apr 19 2013 : 9:10AM

Yes, when you see a sexy chick ride a really handsome dick, then you naturally start fantasizing about her being such a wanton whore that she will let you join in the fun with her. Because there is no way you can compete with her handsome guy, unless she opens up her ass and gives you and the other guy two holes to ride.
Anal becomes important in this situation, because with only one hole to fuck, it doesn't make much sense for the pretty lady to take two guys at the same time. And it doesn't make much sense for the other guy to let you join in on the fun either. You need to see the lady have anal sex with her guy, because anal ladies usually let guys ride their pussies too. Anal ladies have two holes to ride, which makes your fantasy about joining in on the fun with an attractive anal lady very realistic indeed. Two fucking holes for two horny poles is a perfect match.
In porn, you always see the lady have sex with another guy, which naturally leads you to anal fantasies about her if you want to join in on the fun with her. But not every viewer fantasizes about joining in on the fun. Some guys watch it like voyeurs, without any desire to join in, which makes a pussy-only-lady quite sufficient for them.
The kind of sex you want to see for the lady depends a lot on whether you want to join in on the fun with her or just watch her from a distance without participating at all. And the way guys fantasize is probably a matter of habit for them. That's why some viewers want to see anal sex for every porn lady they like, while other viewers are satisfied with watching such ladies have pussy-only sex.
For me, it has nothing to do with wanting to see the sexy lady go to the next level. I want to see her start with the anal level right away, without any delay. Because this is the only way I can realistically fantasize about sharing her with her fucking guy. I want to see the pussy-only lady go to the anal level not because it's the next level for her, but because it's the only level I'm comfortable with for every porn-lady I like.
Edited by - Dan on 4/19/2013 10:23:16 AM

[Link]

more_cowbell
Member

162 Posts
2/12

Posted - Apr 19 2013 : 11:22AM

Anal/IR is 90 percent of what I watch, so yes.

[Link]

Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07

Posted - Apr 19 2013 : 8:44PM

I find it hard to believe that the reason so many people like watching anal sex is because they fantasize about joining another guy bang the girl. Not saying that that type of thinking doesn't exist but I'm sure most guys who like anal fantasize about having the girl to himself. Why would the average guy want another dude in their fantasy?

[Link]

Todd Gack
Deactivated User

"Oh, of course. Todd Gack."
849 Posts
6/12

Posted - Apr 19 2013 : 8:58PM

^^^ "handsome dick". Did I read that right???

[Link]

Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07

Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 8:13AM

How can you blot out of your mind the porn-stud banging the sexy lady, when he is right there in front of you on screen? Such denial of reality is extremely hard to do. Only mentally ill people can successfully deny stark reality like this. It's not something healthy people can do.
You can try to imagine that the lady will go for you later, after her fucking guy goes away. But if the guy is obviously more handsome and better in bed than you are, then your fantasy would be hard to believe and enjoy. Also trying to imagine something entirely different from what you are watching on screen is so mentally difficult to do that probably not many people can do it well. It's like trying to hold and juggle two different realities in your mind at the same time.
Fantasies need to be believable to be enjoyable. And that's why you can't have a contradiction between what you see on screen and your fantasy based on it.
It doesn't make much sense for the lady or the guy to invite another guy to join in, unless one guy isn't enough to satisfy the lady, and they need another guy to make it a good match.
You need to have two holes for two poles to make it a good match. Anal ladies also do pussy-sex. They have two holes to ride. And that's why you need an anal lady to make your fantasy about joining in the fun realistic enough.
Edited by - Dan on 4/20/2013 8:54:26 AM

[Link]

LCF

All-Star Member

Non Prevalebunt!
10364 Posts
1/05

Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 8:58AM

I'm perfectly fine with anything a favourite of mine wants to do, I am a huge fan of Chastity Lynn I was when she did just vaginal, I am when she does feature movies , I am when she does Lez , I was when she begun to do IR , I stayed when she begun to do anals and I bought today her first Bound Gangbang scene (Kink's DVDs are available in Europe) which depicts almost anything I hate in a movie (rape, violence and so , although obviously acted), but she's fine with it she did an incredible number of scenes for Kink and each time she moves the boundaries of it.
So I say no I don't mind if a performer I like does anything she wants
Edited by - LCF on 4/20/2013 9:00:03 AM

[Link]

Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07

Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 9:14AM

^
When you like anything and everything your favorite porn star does, then this implies that you don't really care if she does kinky things or not. You are focused so much on the lady that anything she does is good enough for you.

[Link]

hoochimama
Deactivated User

1436 Posts
5/10

Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 10:07AM

I'm now convinced ADT is mostly trolls.

What if you saw her poopy porn? Or puppy porn?
The various acts you describe, G/G, B/G, IR, anal, gangbangs etc are still only the girl having sex. The arbitrary distinctions between them being lost on most of those who aren't porn afficionados, let's keep some perspective. Dudes who would suddenly be turned off by a hardcore pornstar over such small details are most likely a tiny minority.
____________________________
Please ID these PlayboyTV girls https://forum.adultdvdtalk.com/playboytv-foursome-identification-thread/
Edited by - hoochimama on 4/20/2013 10:23:57 AM

[Link]

Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07

Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 10:24AM

I'm a fan of Chastity's also and I like seeing her in almost everything except when she's playing "barely legal" and they push the little girl stuff too much. I also saw a Bound Gangbang she did that I didn't like because it looked like she didn't enjoy it but that was her playing the role more anything because she said she was into it in the post intereview. But it doesn't matter because I don't like seeing girls not into the sex (play acting or not). The funny thing about me being so into Chastity is I usually go for the fuller figure types.
With performer like Chastity while I like seeing her go to the next level with her performances, I would still like her even if she didn't do the wilder stuff. I consider Chastity on of those performers who has a appeal and "it" that she doesn't need to do wild things to be entertaining to me. There are some girls who I think have to do the "kinky" or wild stuff just to make up for not having that type of appeal that makes you want to watch them regardless of what they do.
What makes me a big fan of a particular girl falls into different catagories...I a fan of some girls because of their sexy looks, a fan of some because of their sexual performances, a fan of some because their body, and of some because they just look good being banged, and some girls I'm really into and can't explain why. Sometimes a girl will fall into multiple catagories and knock my socks off.

[Link]

Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07

Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 11:22AM

The guy is handsome from the woman's point of view, and he is a dick from another guy's point of view. Because he is competition for you, the veiwer. Which is why I say that the guy is a handsome dick.
The guy's handsomeness or dickiness is in the eye of the beholder, which includes the woman and you. There are two points of view, and both are important for any fantasy you might have about the woman.

[Link]

LCF

All-Star Member

Non Prevalebunt!
10364 Posts
1/05

Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 11:41AM

Draxxx wrote:
I'm a fan of Chastity's also and I like seeing her in almost everything except when she's playing "barely legal" and they push the little girl stuff too much. I also saw a Bound Gangbang she did that I didn't like because it looked like she didn't enjoy it but that was her playing the role more anything because she said she was into it in the post intereview. But it doesn't matter because I don't like seeing girls not into the sex (play acting or not). The funny thing about me being so into Chastity is I usually go for the fuller figure types.
Click to expand
Well I feel exactly the same about Chastity in her Barely Legal stuff , about the bound gang bang , I'm not a member of Kink , I usually don't like BDSM , but Chastity said more than once that she enjoys such things, she likes to be dominated , that is why her scenes are so great.
I'm not a twitter follower but sometimes I try to get some info when a performer I like is less active and she said some time ago that she was enjoyng anal sex more and more, back then she was a no anal performer and just did one anal scene with her boyfriend , but she was telling the truth , because she begun to perform anals with him then with other people (her first non BF was Sean Michaels) then for Jay Sin then getting anally fisted for Kink ( from the preview I saw she did a scene with a champ like Roxy Raye) and then getting Mandingo Balls Deep , she is an anal queen now, and I like her as such

[Link]

Dread
Senior Member

Latex and boobs
5085 Posts
3/07

Posted - Apr 20 2013 : 6:07PM

As long as the woman doing porn that I like is doing men then I'm fine. Anal and bondage and my other kinks are just bonuses in the long run. Though I watch gg porn sometimes in my bdsm scenes if a girl goes straight gg I'll no longer watch unless she pops up on one of kinks or other bdsm websites.
----Dread----

[Link]

Draxxx
Senior Member

3831 Posts
2/07

Posted - Apr 21 2013 : 12:42AM

I think she's done several scenes for KINK.COM and I think other than the one I actually saw the whole way through the others I only saw previews of and they didn't look as "rough" as the one I watched. I don't mind the rough stuff up to a point. I'm not into hard slapping, choking and such and don't like when the girl ends up looking all msessed up like she was in a fight. But anyway, the other scenes she did for them lokk to be more to my liking.
But....as a Chastity fan, while I like the more extreme stuff she does I can happily watch her do the more standard scene. I enjoyed her doing IR DP for WESTCOAST PRODUCIONS and I was very close to buying a DIGITAL PLAYGROUND DVD because she was in it doing a more vanilla type scene.

[Link]

type23
Member

21 Posts
4/13

Posted - Apr 21 2013 : 8:37AM

I really care. If a performer doesn't do kinky scene for sure she is not in my favorite list.

craignez honte

[Link]

Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07

Posted - Apr 22 2013 : 8:09AM

^
Yes, what you say is true for many other porn fans too.
The original question of this discussion thread assumes that favorite porn ladies are favorite just because of their good looks. Which isn't true for many porn fans. Many porn fans are interested in specific sex acts, and they choose their favorite porn ladies only among those who do those sex acts regularly.
It's not enough for a porn lady to be attractive. Because porn isn't just about posing and looking good. She also needs to be pretty good at performing the sex acts that you want to see, which vary from one porn fan to another.
If the good-looking lady doesn't do anal, for example. Then there is no way she is going to be on the favorite list of an anal porn fan, no matter how good-looking she is.

[Link]

jettyman
Member

No matter what size the tits are....play with them....
732 Posts
12/08

Posted - Apr 22 2013 : 8:09AM

I do like seeing my favorite girls I've seen in mainstream porn suddenly perform in some rougher edgy scenes, there something exciting seeing a girl ass spanked and breast slapped to motivate all parties in a sex scene. It's so much hotter too if she responds by fucking faster and harder without squealing or yelping, it looks like she's encouraged by the roughness.

[Link]

LCF

All-Star Member

Non Prevalebunt!
10364 Posts
1/05

Posted - Apr 22 2013 : 4:29PM

Of course none of you take into considerations that the most famous and considered pornstars are those of Wicked and Digital Playground , some of them highly praised even on this board , I mean the likes as Jesse Jane , or Kayden Kross , or Bibi Jones or Riley Steele or Stoya but you can add Savanna Samson , Jessica Drake , Tera Patrick, Janine and most famous of them all Jenna Jameson
The kinkiest of them all might be considered Stoya who does anals often.
But they are all very far from an average unknown to the casual consumers gonzo star
There's no need to be kinky to get some stardom , think of Lexi Belle , she did just one anal maybe two in her whole career , yet she still is one of the best

[Link]

bootymeister
Senior Member

Gravity as Curved Space: Bootymeister's Theory of General Relativity
1589 Posts
11/08

Posted - Apr 22 2013 : 5:46PM

My current favorite active pornstar is Misty Stone. My previous favorite active pornstar is Marie Luv. Actually, perhaps every pornstar is kinky. I can not think of a pornstar who will not at least do facials. Relatively, Misty Stone is less kinky than most gonzo stars, although she does get most of her work in gonzo. Misty does not do anal, rim males, and only occasionally swallows. Marie Luv is one of the most kinky pornstars. If there is something Marie Luv has not done, it is becuase of lack of an opportunity. What they have in common, is that I love the their looks and their great ability to perform.

If a pornstar can not consistently deliver an entertaining blow job on camera, then I can not put her my A-list. I constantly have to wonder 'why is she even in this business?'.

Kinkiness and a broad repertoire matter if you need your favorite pornstar to be active. However, my A-list of active pornstars has everything I want to see covered, so I do not need any single pornstar to do everything I like.

Edited by - bootymeister on 4/22/2013 6:07:50 PM

[Link]

Todd Gack
Deactivated User

"Oh, of course. Todd Gack."
849 Posts
6/12

Posted - Apr 22 2013 : 7:25PM

Considering the fact that not every white chick will bend over for black dick, I think it's pretty reasonable for black guys to want to see black studs take on the white ladies.
Because when you see a black guy take the ass of a sexy white lass, then it's a pretty good sign that she is probably available for black guys in general. You can fantasize about her, without any fear of rejection from her.
Fantasies work well only when they are consistent with the facts that you know. And if you know that the lady won't do black guys, then it's pretty hard to ignore this fact in your fantasies too. It intrudes into your fantasies and makes them less hot.

[Link]

realtip
Deactivated User

2301 Posts
6/04

Posted - Apr 22 2013 : 10:20PM

^I don't think that's true at all. I don't believe for a second that all these girls who don't IR haven't done it in their personal lives. Mostly all of them have. The only reason they don't do it on camera is due to the retarded porn industry politics that still view sex between black men and white women as some "kinky" taboo act, as if it's still the 19th-century.
As long as the U.S. porn industry (and I specify U.S. because this problem doesn't exist in porn produced anywhere else outside of the U.S.) remains in the Jim Crow era and makes a big deal about race, then white female performers will continue to make excuses for not doing it on camera, even though they'll do it off-camera. If the porn industry treated black male performers with the same regard that it treats white male performers, then all this IR bullshit wouldn't even be an issue.
Whenever I think of all of the stupid racial hang-ups that the porn industry still has, it just reminds me that porn isn't known for attracting the most intelligent people.

[Link]

hardy83177
Member

Katy Perry melted my popsicle.
243 Posts
5/10

Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 12:27AM

It truly depends on the star. If she started in Feature porn, say, like Stormy Daniels, who is my favorite, and never went to the true wild gonzo stuff, NO I don't care. However, if it is a star, Phoenix Marie, whom is now my favorite ACTIVE star, then yeah, it is great she does some of the kinky stuff, would I like her any less if she DID NOT do it? No. Hope my answer helps! Thanks.

[Link]

CummingLinguist

All-Star Member

5908 Posts
11/11

Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 7:39AM

I wasn't assuming that looks alone determine any fans "favorites". There are certainly high- and low-quality performers. For me, what makes a great performance is enthusiasm. Great performers enjoy performing.
I personally think Gianna was a great performer.
I am in the minority on this, but I didn't really enjoy her one anal performance in Big Wet Asses. From my couch, she didn't seem to enjoy herself as much as she did in other performances. (Like I said, I know I'm in the minority, but I'm using it to make a point.) On the other hand, I think she really enjoyed performing with black guys. In general, I don't care about IR, and I like anal. But in the case of Gianna, I would be much more likely to check out an IR scene than another anal scene (if it existed).
I posed the question because so many fans nag their favorites to do particular acts. The way I look at it, if she wants to do it, she'll do it. If she doesn't want to, it probably won't be a great scene anyway.

[Link]

Dan
Senior Member

2056 Posts
6/07

Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 8:59AM

^
If you choose favorite ladies by their performance and not just by their looks. Then she can't be a favorite one, without performing the things that people want to see her do.
I've said in this forum before that I'd love to see Natasha Nice have anal sex with guys. And I said this not because she was my favorite porn star but because she had the potential to become one, if she did the things that I wanted to see her do.
It doesn't quite make sense to have performance as a condition for the lady being favorite, and then ask if you care about the performance of your favorite ladies or not. Obviously you care, or else she wouldn't be your favorite.

[Link]

RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06

Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 11:52AM

I don't consider these things to be all that kinky. Kinky, to me, is things like spankings and bondage.
But to answer the question, I do prefer that my favorites do things like anal and swallowing. I consider that to be basic porn. I would probably rather see the cutest girls sucking another girl's feet than doing DP or IR or creampies.

[Link]

RandomPrecision
Senior Member

Enjoy!
8175 Posts
3/06

Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 12:20PM

Well, the plain fact is that if it is treated as kinky and taboo and the girl holds off on it, she still has something to sell when she stops getting hired for other things. I don't think it's political in most cases. It just makes it a nice niche where people can make more money.
Porn is the worst place in the world for PC

[Link]

H1gh Contra5t

All-Star Member

"My asshole just naturally opens up because that's what I want, I'm so horny for it"
8498 Posts
1/13

Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 8:00PM

I had an interesting thought today and I am not sure what the answer is. Early on I said that my favourite porn stars are ones that I perceive to be most naturally beautiful and who look fantastic whatever they do on screen, however kinky or vanilla it may be. I still stick by that. But it occurred to me today that when I discover a new star who becomes a favourite, why is it I look for any and all anal scenes they have done first? It's definitely my favourite thing to see a porn star do but it does not define them as a favourite if they do it or not. Have I answered my own question or is there some paradox hidden in there somewhere?

[Link]

Todd Gack
Deactivated User

"Oh, of course. Todd Gack."
849 Posts
6/12

Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 8:19PM

If porn studs start behaving like real gentlemen with the pretty lady, then there won't be much of a fuck for porn fans to celebrate.
Because guys will be too nice to nail the ass of their lass all the way to their balls. They won't DP her for fear of being ungentlemanly with her. And they might even lose their erection, if the pretty lady gives a dirty look in their direction.

[Link]

realtip
Deactivated User

2301 Posts
6/04

Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 8:31PM

When I think of things that are kinky, I think of particular sex acts (e.g., anal, DP, TP, double anal, pissing, rough sex, etc.), not of the people with whom one performs those acts. That's why calling IR "kinky" makes no sense to me. You're labelling it "kinky" just because of the people involved, not because of the actual act.
It's also fucked up that IR has often become something to be held off from doing until a girl becomes less popular, and can't be hired for anything else. There are quite a few girls who do this now. They do kinky acts like all the ones mentioned above, but still haven't done IR. It would seem that they would be saving those acts for later in their career. What's with the whole idea that doing an airtight gangbang with five white guys and swallowing all their loads at the end is less "kinky" than doing a plain vanilla sex scene with one black guy? Where does this idea come from?
Then, after she's been shot-out from doing every kinky act that's allowed to be done in porn, and decides to start doing easy vanilla scenes with black guys, are fans supposed to be satisfied because she finally decided that black male pornstars are now good enough to fuck her when nobody else wants her anymore?
The whole idea of girls doing anal, DP, and gangbangs before they do regular IR scenes is just completely backwards. If the sex act is the same, then what difference does it make who it's with? The implication is that black men are somehow different from all other men, so much so that if she does the same thing with a black man that she does with a white man, then it's "kinky" just because she's doing it with a black man. That's just stupid.
Edited by - realtip on 4/23/2013 8:35:37 PM

[Link]

CRFlixxx
Member

60 Posts
4/13

Posted - Apr 23 2013 : 11:42PM

That's why I don't enjoy most mainstream features, too bland. They're all the same....Girl on boxcover has sex twice, maybe a lesbian scene, then two or three more scenes with girls I don't care about as much cause I got the vid for the girl on the cover.
But the flip side is, if a girl winds up doing everything and doing it often, that also winds up boring because after a year or two you've pretty much seen her do everything and there's nothing left for her to do. I wish Sasha Grey was still around, but she did it right, did it all then left in her prime.
Still, I'd rather have the latter than the former. At least you'd get a year of greatness vs a decade of meh.

[Link]

realtip
Deactivated User

2301 Posts
6/04

Posted - Apr 24 2013 : 1:14AM

^Jessie Rogers is another one who comes to mind. She came into porn at the age of 18. At the age of 19, she had already quit the business after doing anal, DP, DA, group scenes, rough sex, and IR, making her one of the most popular girls in porn. Within one year, she did everything that a lot of other girls take five or ten years to get around to doing, if they ever get around to it at all.
By doing so, she apparently followed the old adage that says to leave them wanting more, which is exactly what she did. It's one thing for a pornstar to leave porn after doing it for years, and everyone is already tired of seeing her. But it's another thing entirely to come into the industry, make a huge splash, and then quickly turn around and leave at the height of her popularity, like Jessie did.
Not only that, but she was also one of the sexiest girls in the industry, especially after she got her bigger boobs. Whereas a lot of female pornstars stay in the industry for years doing the same old boring scenes, and really need to just go home and quit already, she is one girl who I hope changes her mind and decides to return to the industry.

[Link]

Danger Josh
Member

I've been in the Danger Zone!
385 Posts
4/13

Posted - Apr 24 2013 : 7:49PM

I personally have a list of 25 pornstars that i usually jerk off to. The list has a lot of variation and includes girls that do Anal, DP, DPP, DAP, Gangbang, Swallow, Creampie and some just plain B/G. For me what matters is if the girls is hot and looks hot doing it. If see turns me on doing it then i will watch it.

[Link]

LawrenceSingleton
Member

Pornosexual
52 Posts
6/09

Posted - Apr 24 2013 : 8:01PM

Me neither. Because if she doesn't do certain things(i.e. anal), then not only is she not one of my favorites; chances are, I'm barely even aware of her existence.
There'll be no "When will X do anal" from me, because with rare exceptions, I simply don't watch non-anal scenes in the first place, and I don't bother learning the name of a performer until I see her in an anal scene.
Also, even if someone does eventually do anal, that doesn't guarantee that she'll do it in a way that I actually like. So even in the event that a non-anal performer somehow makes it onto my radar, I'm ambivalent about the prospect of her "first anal". As for other firsts, I don't have any interest in DP/DAP/DPP, gangbangs, creampies, etc., so I don't care if a girl does or doesn't do them.

[Link]

Reecie
Member

Mrs. Reecie
249 Posts
3/14

Posted - Jun 11 2016 : 12:48PM

There are lots of kinky acts, but creampies and swallowing are important to me; and anal is my threshold.
When a starlet does anal, it makes everything hotter. If Nyomi Banxxx is giving a handjob, for example, I'm thinking, "She'll take it up the ass AND swallow his load!"
My favorites tend to have phat asses or thick lips, but the ones at the top of my list are also kinky.

[Link]