But why do YOU think "extreme BDSM" (😂) like CBT should be banned?

[Link]

As for the second part of your assumption, I am not suggesting anything. I am only asking.

[Link]

There's so much good work to be done in the world, that I'd rather that lawmakers stay out of my pants and stay out of women's uteri.

[Link]

If the genders were reversed, the 'act' would have probably been banned already.

Even if it was consensual (suicide could be consensual; that doesn't make aiding or abetting in suicide alright).

[Link]

Women are also subjected to many harsh sado-masochistic activities in BDSM porn. Pussy clamps (hung on the labia), nipple clamps, tight rope bondage, anal hooks, etc can lead to loss of sensation & damage to muscle tissues in women. These activities have not been banned. Why? Because performers are NOT retards. They can ask the shoot to stop the moment they feel uncomfortable.
Maybe read up on the subject before making sensationalist posts about banning sex acts you are scared of. Or better yet, as one poster above has suggested- just ignore these pornos if they are so offensive to your fragile sensibilities. It's not like CBT porn is unavoidable in porn sites- people have to specifically search for these scenes

[Link]

So, someone has to be suffer permanent testicle damage (maybe even lose his life) first in a 'professional porn shoot' (your conditions) for you to even take notice?. Good to see.

"Women are also subjected to many harsh sado-masochistic activities in BDSM porn. Pussy clamps (hung on the labia), nipple clamps, tight rope bondage, anal hooks, etc can lead to loss of sensation & damage to muscle tissues in women."

Clamps on pussies is not the equivalent of ball-busting (if you knew anything about biology, you'd know that). The equivalent of ball-busting would be ovary busting (but then ovaries are internal sexual organs). Suppose there was an immensely painful act, something which isn't even a sex act, something that could permanently damage a woman's ability to have children EVER and could very well be fatal, are you telling me there won't be any discussion about it?. Ball-busting is not actually a sex act, is it now? (it's sexual assault).

"These activities have not been banned.".

If you learned to read, you'd see I haven't called for a ban, I am just
asking a simple question. I just want the opinion of others.

"Because performers are NOT retards. They can ask the shoot to stop the moment they feel uncomfortable."

Because everyone knows how much damage to his immensely sensitive, external sexual organs he himself can take, right?. What if someone numb from the pain of sexual assault disguised as a sex act judges wrongly on the amount of bruising his genitals can take?. And you have the audacity to call other people's posts troll posts?.

"Maybe read up on the subject before making sensationalist posts about banning sex acts you are scared of. Or better yet, as one poster above has suggested- just ignore these pornos if they are so offensive to your fragile sensibilities."

Like I said before, I am not advocating banning plain sexual assault (i.e. ball-busting) disguised as sex acts. If you knew to read and comprehend, you would know that. I just asked a simple question, I just want the opinion of others. You are the one here that looks like trying to shut down discussion ("just ignore these pornos if they are so offensive to your fragile sensibilities.").

Btw, if an act doesn't harm us personally or individually, we should just
ignore it and not even have a discussion?. "Fragile sensibilities". My sensibilities are fine, I just care about people. (You don't, that's your problem).

"What are you yapping about? How on earth are suicide & CBT related subjects?
The mental gymnastics in this post is next level."

I am not yapping about anything here (I just asked a simple question). Suicide and ball-busting are related in that they are both harmful.

Edited by - Jhonko87 on 7/21/2024 12:35:36 PM

[Link]

"UWU evwybody look at me I'm so smawt, CBT = sexual assault. Don't you see? Evwybody pwease vawidate my opinions, guys, pwease. UWU"
- Jhonko87, House of Hypocrisy
  Mansplainer of female anatomy
  (He who can tell the state of a man's internal sexual organs by looking at them real hard with his X-Ray vision)

[Link]

If that's what people want, it's their decision, I guess.

Edited by - Jhonko87 on 7/23/2024 12:01:24 PM

[Link]

We have all seen stuff that we absolutely hated - I can't stand those Facial Abuse type scenes & those god-forsaken pissing gangbangs that LegalPorno churn out, so I do my best to avoid them. I'm sure everyone here has a similar sentiment regarding porn they hate.

But for CBT - why do you go to such an extent to watch these scenes (I mean they are only available on a few BDSM sites) when they are clearly so distressing for you? I'm genuinely curious.

[Link]

It's hard to explain but I have this tendency to get intensely worked up about some issues unrelated to my personal life. People getting hurt, some injustice happening. I am often like, 'why isn't anyone condemning this?'. But then there is so much pain and injustice in the world, we can't solve them all. If only I cared about my own personal life than other people's issues, then perhaps I would have been more successful in my life.

When I came across ball-busting for the 1st time, I was like 'why would you do that?'. I just couldn't understand it. I have been hit badly during playing sports and I know how excruciatingly painful it is. So, I couldn't fathom why anyone would give consent to get hit in such an extremely sensitive area.

But if that's what consenting adults want to do, then it's their decision, I guess.

Take care.

[Link]

And many men all over the world have died painful deaths from getting hit in the testicles (either accidentally or deliberately). Maybe not in porn but outside of porn.

I mentioned women in my posts only because I feel when a woman is about to engage in an act of self-harm, other women come forward to dissuade, to prevent that act or to warn others. Women nowadays have each other's backs. For example, when there was a news breaking out that a woman died from getting choked during consensual sex, there were several articles warning people about that act.

Sadly, comparatively at least, men don't care that much when other men engage in acts of self-harm. Men rarely take it seriously when someone gets hit in the balls. It's sad that getting hit in the balls (either accidentally or on purpose) is a comedy staple (eg: funniest home videos, movies etc).

Maybe I care about weird things.

Maybe genital torture (ball-busting or pussy torture), even if consensual, should come with a warning.

[Link]

If hitting someone in extremely sensitive genitals (an act which has lead to painful deaths outside of porn) isn't equivalent to sexual assault, what else would you call it?. If it was done to women, it would be rightly called sexual assault. Consensual sexual assault.

Ball-busting is consensual act of self harm.

https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/article/2024/sep/02/i-think-its-natural-why-has-sexual-choking-become-so-prevalent-among-young-people

The above is a link to a Guardian article about the dangers of consensual sexual strangulation. Even though sexual strangulation is a comparatively rare consensual sex act, because it has claimed women's lives, even a well-known mainstream news organisation like The Guardian has taken notice (there have been several articles in the past on the same news website).

That's the only reason I brought up women in my earlier comments. When women give their consent to their partners to engage in life-threatening acts like choking during sex, mainstream media reports with rightful alarm. Whereas when men engage in acts of self harm, people consider it a joke and laugh it off. (look at that a-hole 'rear admiral' reply above).

[Link]

That's just common sense (you really don't need superhuman ability to know that act cause excruciating pain).

Amazing how this topic was shut down. No replies to my previous two comments on this thread.

[Link]