Reviewers Recommend
Hardcore Bangers 2Hardcore Bangers 2 - review by Captain Jack
Director: Mason
Starring: GoGo Fukme, Jordy Love, Maya Farrell, Tessa Thomas. Read review
All Forums > The Porn Pool > The Porn Pool Forum Page 686 > Does it have to be degrading?
AuthorPost
Spew
Deactivated User

Bend over for the rod and staff of Jesus!
334 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jul 30 2004 : 8:01PM
I've noticed a lot of boxcovers degrade the girls. Read the back cover of SOUTH AMERICAN PIE:

http://www.fivestardvd.com/item.asp?titleid=DVXNSOUTHAMERICANPIE


am I the only one who thinks this is mean???? maybe im just crazy

DenverDon
Benevolent

Firmly Embedded in Depravity
5914 Posts
7/02
Posted - Jul 30 2004 : 8:08PM
There has been quite a bit of discussion about box cover hype. Those that write it seem to think that it helps sell it. Maybe it does.

Personally, I view it as just hype.

I'm also a little bit surprised that you think this might be 'mean' considering some of the other topics you've started and posts you have made.

Edited by - DenverDon on 7/30/2004 8:18:36 PM

jewel denyle
Platinum X Pictures

769 Posts
4/03
Posted - Jul 30 2004 : 9:06PM
I don't think any of our boxes are degrading at all at PXP I come up with all the quotes for my boxes because it fits what's in the movie.

Spew
Deactivated User

Bend over for the rod and staff of Jesus!
334 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jul 30 2004 : 9:28PM
Denver: in the other topics ive made the girls are willing participents (sp?) in whatever is going on. and trust me, no matter how much you pay someone, they wont go fucking you with shit if thats not something they generally like. but the box covers are mean because you know for sure the girls had no say in that. plus, on SOUTH AMERICAN PIE for example, its very streotypical "mexican" stuff (despite the fact one of the girls is obviosuly not mexican).
DenverDon
Benevolent

Firmly Embedded in Depravity
5914 Posts
7/02
Posted - Jul 30 2004 : 9:37PM
Fair enough spew, but in your other posts it was not made clear that the girls were willing participants.

For the box covers, just treat it as hype. There's tons of it on many box covers. Just check some of the IR covers that are available. Whoever writes it (with approval from the studio) apparently thinks it will help sales. Maybe it does.

DenverDon

 
imak
Adult Film Legend

3345 Posts
2/04
Posted - Jul 30 2004 : 11:18PM
you assume they are willing when it suits you, you cant have it both ways
Spew
Deactivated User

Bend over for the rod and staff of Jesus!
334 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jul 30 2004 : 11:51PM
are you saying porn girls are "forced" to have sex? and im not tlking about underground shit, i mean stuff thats actually on the USA shelves. i find that hard to believe.
imak
Adult Film Legend

3345 Posts
2/04
Posted - Jul 31 2004 : 12:31AM
no i am not implying anyone is forced, i am saying its weird you find it degrading when it's something you don't like.
Spew
Deactivated User

Bend over for the rod and staff of Jesus!
334 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jul 31 2004 : 12:46AM
is it not degrading? did you even look at the cover?
snowman872
RainCoatReviews.com

400 Posts
6/00
Posted - Jul 31 2004 : 2:20AM

I looked at it and I don't think it much more degrading than most gonzo titles out there today. The only thing different is that it has many Latina references.

I tend to see the issue as something that relates to all women, not just Latinas, so this doesn't elevate it in my eyes.

-- Snowman

Diceman
Member

211 Posts
10/03
Posted - Jul 31 2004 : 2:44AM
This is the same person who started the "Hey poop fans" thread, right? You know, your sensitivity to anything went right out the fuckin' window when you did that... you know that don't you?
Spew
Deactivated User

Bend over for the rod and staff of Jesus!
334 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jul 31 2004 : 3:18AM
You're insipid, go do something else
eduardo911
Senior Member

1299 Posts
8/03
Posted - Jul 31 2004 : 6:44AM
There's difference between the kinds of insensitivities some posters are referring to with regard to I spew's sexual preferences and the box covers he's criticizing.
Yeah, and I think some of those are objectionable too, for reasons I've elaborated upon in various other posts (not only about box covers, but also some of the on-screen texts by Jake Steed Productions in the White Chicks ... series, for example).

In my view, the difference lies in the ethnic-racial stereotyping that I always thought to be illegal in the US.

Spew
Deactivated User

Bend over for the rod and staff of Jesus!
334 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jul 31 2004 : 7:33AM
Thank you! Exactly what I'm thinking.
agreed
Renee
Member

765 Posts
8/03
Posted - Jul 31 2004 : 10:48AM
I spew on my face,

It's likely you're of Mexican descent, with the sobriquet '¿Quieres chingarme?' under your name - it's Mexican Spanish for 'Do you want to fuck me?' Kind of makes sense that you would be a touch sensitive about the wording on the back cover of this film, especially the 'filthy streets of Tijuana' part.

So, perhaps you can sympathize with any black, Asian, Eastern European person who's read some porn back cover and cringed at the stereotypes that the words portray, that the porn company is obviously using to attract certain types of customers - that is, those who think these stereotypes are funny, or even true.

As for language used in a movie itself, I cringe when I see, during the main footage, a woman being told to call herself a whore or a filthy slut, either by the director or her male performer (sometimes, repeatedly). If she wants to say those words of her own accord, that's one thing, but there's plenty of times that you see she's doing it because she's being told to do so, not because she wants to.

Edited by - Renee on 7/31/2004 10:49:40 AM

 
Kperv
The Cuddler

*struck
(She slipped)

1818 Posts
1/04
Posted - Jul 31 2004 : 11:09AM
Crude titles aren't limited to ethnic series.

Whats with titles like: "A Cum Sucking Whore Named Sabrina"?

With a back cover reading: "Anabolic brings you a collection of scenes starring a Brit who's main source of food just may be the salty semen that shoots from the work that her pimp/husband finds her! Thus a CUM SUCKING WHORE NAMED SABRINA."

Classy.

Whore? Couldn't they come up with something a little less derogatory? Sexpot or something similar.

Or how about "Cuddly Sex kitten" as IIRC Kimi Lixx is described in her bio on the Phantom Love DVD. Now that's cute.

Do derogatory titles or similar language in the movie itself increase sales, or are they only there because of some fratboy mentality in the studios, without regard to whether the potential customers like it or not?

I'd really like to know.

nickdel
Member

281 Posts
2/04
Posted - Jul 31 2004 : 12:47PM
Looking back at what I just wrote, it's a long way to explain very little. Sorry 'bout that.

Ok, I looked at the box cover, read the description. I guess the problem is with the first line: "Latina Girls take pride in being the filthiest, nastiest, crazed women." Now, I can't really tell, but I think there is a period at the end of the word crazed. If there is, then this sentence is the only "derogatory" one on the box. If that little mark is a comma, then the remainder of the quote would be, "Blessed with plump round asses, mocha brown nipples, and full sucking lips."

Either way you see the first part of the description, the next part starts with the word, "These." But, notice that it's capitalized and bigger than the other letters. Since there are other sentences on the cover that start with capitals but have small letters, we can assume that this is a new thought. "These dirty girls were born and raised..." It's obvious that the girls in this quote, and following throughout the remainder of the description, are the performers in this specific movie.

What's all this mean? That the only racially objectionable line on the box is the first: "Latina girls..." Personally, I've never heard a stereotype about Latin women being filthy and nasty and crazed. So, the stereotype thing - for me, at least - is out. But, I could see how a person might take offense to the women of his/her race being called filthy and nasty and that they take pride in it.

On the other hand, this is porn. Knowing what genre the line came from, we can assume that it refers to sex. So, now we have a line about the filthiness and nastiness and craziness of Latin girls during sex. So, I ask the question, is there anyone here in this forum that only makes love? That only has romantic relations with their significant other? Do any of you only participate in sensual, sensitive, soft, slow, missionary sex? I doubt it. So, if we've all been involved in some filthy or nasty or crazy sex - and enjoyed it! - where's the harm?

If we all love nasty sex at some point, and if the person you're with isn't into it, would you keep them around? If one of your biggest turn ons is, say, filthy talk, and your lover won't do it, you'll probably go out and find someone who will. I'm not saying you'll cheat, just that you'll tend to find someone who will cater to your particular tastes. If you like to be spanked, you'd better find someone to do it, and not someone who is offended by the mere thought of it.

If all this is true, then not only do we like filthy and nasty people during sex, we will seek out those best at it.

Given the above, isn't that first line on the box really a compliment? I know, I know, the logic dizzying.

Let's keep things in perspective here, folks. If you find the cover objectionable - even if others don't - just don't watch the movie. Yeah, we're here to discuss, but not to bash each other.

As for Tijuana, I've never been there. But, isn't the cleanliness of the backstreets of any city questionable?

(Good luck with this one - I don't even know what it means )

Spew
Deactivated User

Bend over for the rod and staff of Jesus!
334 Posts
7/04
Posted - Jul 31 2004 : 5:13PM
actually im 100% white american but yeah, it has to be the worst boxcover ive ever seen (and im sure theres worse!).
licker
Senior Member

Heretic, Iconoclast, Skeptic
1141 Posts
8/03
Posted - Jul 31 2004 : 11:39PM
This topic has appeared on ADT in the past, and some of the actresses have responded to say that is does indeed hurt their feelings to be described this way on box covers. They do not get any say in the words that are used.

I have seen covers that use words like "worthless", "useless" and "pigs" to describe girls. Sometimes this is right next to her picture as she looks at me with a sweet, friendly smile.

I just can't imagine ever getting this attitude into my mind. Here is a lovely young woman, a real person who is smiling at a camera for me, inviting me to see her lovemaking, and someone is calling her "worthless". It's weird and it's cruel.

Someone must think it sells I suppose.

dac
David Aaron Clark

Just another WKW wannabe
574 Posts
2/04
Posted - Aug 1 2004 : 1:52AM
well, it in fact does sell -- to mysogynists, closet myogynists, basically the immature, bitter, portion of the market who are emotionally disturbed. I'm sure rapists -- and those fantasize about it -- love this stuff & eat it up.

But that type will never go away; human nature is human nature. Best that can be done is not to support that sort of attitude in packaging and production, EVEN if your favorite actress is in it.


dac

Loraine
Senior Member

1559 Posts
3/04
Posted - Aug 1 2004 : 6:44AM
A while back on this forum I read a producer describe with great passion the contents of his latest film. He wrote with loving detail about what he'd tried to produce and why. His enthusiasm for his topic and his work shone through. So much so that I had to go take a look at the boxcover of the said piece of work.

You know when I looked at the marketing and copywriting of the movie I couldn't quite believe the total dumbing down of the copy. I had a lot of trouble reconciling his description of the work with the outward appearance of the product based on the words used to describe its contents.
I haven't watched the movie so I don't know which is nearer the truth, the producer's feelings for his work or the box spiel he let it be marketed with.

It does seem like there is some competition out there to outdo eachother with inane and cringeworthy copy. As Licker points out it's kind of weird and cruel.

I had a look around DVSX.com the other day, I don't own any of their stuff but what did strike me was that in the majority the copy writing on thier box covers doesn't make me want to run screaming to the hills. In fact the series like Truly Nice Ass/Tits are actually described with some admiration for the women and the physical attractions of the women who appear in them. As Kperv noted cute titles and descriptions just seem like more fun.

Ramsey
Senior Member

Trina Michaels fan
10332 Posts
10/02
Posted - Aug 1 2004 : 7:01AM
You think that ZT boxcover is degrading? I guess you never saw a boxcover of Max Hardcore ;-)
Kperv
The Cuddler

*struck
(She slipped)

1818 Posts
1/04
Posted - Aug 1 2004 : 7:22AM
Which is part of why I've gotten into Kick Ass's stuff lately.
I love titles like Kung-Fu Girls: They'll kick your ass and you'll love it with back covers reading They'll fuck and suck the enemy into submission. Kung-Fu Girls rule! Behold the power of pussy!

And they tend to portray the women in a positive way.

Now that's a description that'll get me interested.

Unfortunately they sometimes take the low road too.

They are a weird company. Take a look at this press release: Porn Company Counters U.S. Military?s Offer of Free Boob Jobs
Zoid
Senior Member

Boobies and Anal
2004 Posts
5/04
Posted - Aug 1 2004 : 2:21PM
Here is the worst box cover I have seen:

front
back

Edited by - Zoid on 8/1/2004 2:21:25 PM




Jump To: